Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should flavored alchohol be banned?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:40 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should flavored alchohol be banned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there a particular reason why it should?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Just an experiment in psychology.
The hypothesis: people are less likely to support a ban on sins they enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. interesting
I agree with your hypothesis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Here's the reason for the question
Federal health officials banned the sale of flavored cigarettes on Tuesday in the first major crackdown since the Food and Drug Administration was given the authority to regulate tobacco.

The ban is intended to end the sale of tobacco products with chocolate, vanilla, clove and other flavorings that lure children and teenagers into smoking. The agency will study regulating menthol products and hinted that it might soon take action against the far larger market of flavored small cigars and cigarillos.

“These flavored cigarettes are a gateway for many children and young adults to become regular smokers,” Dr. Margaret A. Hamburg, commissioner of food and drugs, said in announcing the ban.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/23/health/policy/23fda.html?_r=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Oh goody, the FDA just created another black market.
What a bunch of idiots.

Guess the cops don't have enough to worry about with drugs

Now there will be a black market for vanilla flavored cigs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Nicotine *is* a highly addictive drug..
Alcohol also is a highly addictive drug..

I'm constantly floored by the number of people who use language that implies that these two drugs are not in fact "drugs"..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. If we don't do it now and the Pukes get back in power, it won't ever get done. Hurry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Yes, both are addictive drugs.
But alcohol, in moderation, will not kill you, and may in fact, be good for you (the "one glass of wine a day" theory.)

There's no such thing as a "safe" daily amount of nicotine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. It depends a great deal on the person..
People vary a lot in their susceptibility to addiction to various drugs, some can take just a few drinks and become addicted to alcohol while others can smoke cigarettes for many years and put them away with little effort.

In a titrated delivery system such as say, gum, nicotine is actually pretty safe even if it is addictive.

It isn't the nicotine which makes cigarettes dangerous, it's the multitude of other compounds that cause heart disease, emphysema, cancer and so on.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. Sorry, I should have posted "worry about with other drugs".
You can go argue about cigs with someone else, I don't really care what you think about them.

But I must ask you, do you think we should ban alcohol? I mean it is a drug and bootlegging did make some very prominent US citizens a fortune during prohibition.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. I think all recreational drugs should be legal and regulated..
Yes, even meth..

The reason I pointed our your semantic error is because I constantly see people who should know better, like my physician ex-brother-in-law, make exactly the same mistake. He talks about the evils of "drugs" while drinking to excess a surprising amount (not to mention his diet blows major chunks, way too much red meat and it shows).

I think it's a way that many people fool themselves into thinking they aren't "doing drugs" when they drink "adult beverages" and smoke tobacco.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. And my post in no way could be read like anything your ex BIL
may have said as reflected in your post.

Seems you have issues with your ex BIL that you end up taking out on folk on the board. IMHO, you should try to work on your issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. Here's what you wrote..
"Guess the cops don't have enough to worry about with drugs"..

Not hard to take that the way I did..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Yes, yes it was hard, for the normal person - see how you alone
jumped on it and got what you did out of it.

You have issues with your exBIL, deal with them and leave me alone. You've brought nothing to the table but bitter grapes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. No, I have issues with the drug war..
I'm one of a very few people who raise the point about "alcohol and drugs" being a destructive and distracting meme.

I've been fighting this particular battle since long before I ever met my ex BIL so your attempt at remote psychoanalysis is totally off base.

Your name isn't Frist by any chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Hey, you are the one that brought your ex-BIL into this
btw, for someone that has nothing to defend, you sure are defending your posts.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I used him as a concrete example of someone who should know better..
Edited on Thu Sep-24-09 12:58 PM by Fumesucker
That's all.

Now my ex father in law was a physician also and he and I saw very much eye to eye on the subject.

Changing the way people think about "drugs" is important to me because nothing about the drug war will change until people's perceptions change.

Edited to add: It's rather like getting a different car, you never notice them on the road until you get one, then you see them all the time. Likewise, once you become sensitized to the phrases like "alcohol and drugs" you realize that that particular meme gets spread constantly and it certainly implies that alcohol is not a drug.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. You may want to work on your tactics.
Your posts are not conducive to improving understanding of anything.

Personally, I have found them boring and self-surving, while being accusatory and unnecessary.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. People differ..
How do you point something out without mentioning it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
46. I rarely drink...
...and mostly if I do it is a small glass of wine. I don't like the taste of hard liquor ~~ tastes like medicine to me...gag!

I vote NO because unless in directly impacts on me or it is abusive/dangerous to children or animals, etc., I frankly do not give a shit what others do. They could eat 200 cherry flavored vodka popcicles a day and I could not care less...unless they get in a car and drive.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Once you are done voting compare it to here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only alcohol flavored with cheetah poo should be legal. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Mmmmm.....cheetah poo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I wish I had thought to make that a choice in the poll n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. It's called tequila.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. ROFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. ROFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. win! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. I think you misspelled "Jagermeister" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. I voted "Yes, all flavor should be removed from alcohol"
Just because no one else would. After a few drinks, your taste buds are numb so what does it matter anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. This doesn't get at what you're trying to show.
"ban flavored cigarettes" is a subset of "ban all cigarettes", a belief that has some traction in the US.

"ban flavored alcohol" is a weird proposal and does not attract any votes from people who want to "ban all alcohol". Because all of us know there are hardly any of those people.

The voting will be skewed by these factors, and of course by a ton of others. It's just an internet poll, after all.

But I really don't think this helps make your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No internet poll can prove anything (for that matter no poll can "prove" anything either).
Edited on Wed Sep-23-09 05:57 PM by Statistical
The real intent was more to see if people who voted yes on the ban flavored cigarettes would suddenly see the hypocrisy of their own actions. I really doubted they would actually vote but maybe for a second they would have that momentary feeling that they are full of shit. They just love to hate cigs because it is the vice they love to hate and drinking is the vice they love to love.

They aren't that dissimilar despite nobody thinking about it.

What are the logical reasons for banning flavored cigs? To make it less attractive for minors? The taste may make some smokers quit/cut back?

How do those not apply to alcohol?

Now I think they are a logical fail for cigs BUT if you feel it applies to cigs (as 18% of DU does) why would you not think it applies to alcohol? Bias maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Yes, bias exists. Cigarettes and alcohol are different substances.
A lot more people are ok with the consequences of others drinking around them, than are ok with the consequences of people smoking around them.

A specific ban on flavored cigarettes is very bizarre. However in an ideal world there would be no cigarettes. I really can't complain about the drive to destroy cigarettes, although the campaign is using every single ridiculous premise and dirty trick to get the job done.

The only reason to feel bad about this is to have sympathy for the smokers, which I do. If the idea is to get rid of cigarettes almost altogether, we should be open about it and address the needs of smokers. A lot of the arguments used now are facetious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. No, but a tax that compensates for the costs of alcohol would be good.
Edited on Wed Sep-23-09 05:59 PM by TexasObserver
The costs of alcohol to society are significant. First, our health care system suffers for it. Second, the costs to children exposed to their parents' alcoholism is incalculable. Third, the costs to productivity, the on the job accidents, the auto accidents - all resulting from booze.

We should have a huge alcohol fund that helps to pay those costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well, would you vote to ban these?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. ROFL! I remember those
For some crazy reason, my parents let me have them every time we went to the neighborhood store that sold them. Never made me smoke though. Then again, I also liked the candy necklaces and ring pops, but I don't wear jewelry. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
47. No, not ban them...
...but IMO it is a good idea that minors could only buy with parental consent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:06 PM
Original message
Is there a history or prospect of them marketing it to kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. I know when I was a kid we went straight for the flavored malt liquour.
Cheap, gets you drunk, and to this teenager tasted a hell of a lot better than piss water = beer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. (looks back fondly on his mad dog days)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Boone's Farm performed (performs?) a similar function..
I still don't like beer at damn near sixty.

But I only very rarely drink alcohol any more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. it allows people to believe they haven't consumed enough alcohol to kill themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. How in the world are you going to get college girls drunk?
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. We used to call it Purple Panther Piss..
190 proof alcohol with a variety of fruit juices..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
21. If you outlaw flavored alcohol
Only outlaws will have flavored alcohol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't drink, thus don't care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gleaner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. I said no
When I was younger and had too much to drink, I invariably hurled at some point. The flavor of the drinks was the only merciful thing I had going when they were making their way back out into the world.

The 150 proof rum which had no flavor was just brutal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hell no. I've got a bunch of apple and peach moonshine. Oh wait that's already illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
32. They should remove all flavor of wine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Grrr . . .
Grrr. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-23-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. You are now my enemy
Why would you say such horrible things??!?! :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. They dont have a facetious smilie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. lol, fair enough
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
43. Other:
I don't know. What are the arguments for it and against it, and what makes this a pressing enough issue to attract attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Govt banned cigarettes that are flavored, so why not alcohol (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #45
58. I don't know.
Why did they ban flavored cigarettes?

My mom quit smoking 30 years ago, and I divorced my first husband in 1988. I haven't been around anyone who actually smoked since then.

I obviously haven't kept up with smoking issues. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
48. Mmmmm everclear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
53. Boxxy says....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenniferj Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-24-09 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
56. In the UK there are they fuel the binge drinking culture...
Go to Nottingham or Cardiff and the pubs are full of steaming drunk teens and twenties on alco-pops...
They need to be more expensive....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC