kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-28-07 02:26 PM
Original message |
| C-SPAN question this AM -- "No more Clintons or Bush" ? |
|
Since 1980, they said we would have had 28 straight years with a Bush or Clinton on the ticket. It was obviously a strike against Hillary. So Democrats have had the White House for 8 years under Clinton since 1980? And Clinton was a great president compared to what preceded him and followed him in office, and that is somehow supposed to disqualify Hillary? With that said, I would opt for some new blood with new ideas and new advisers and aides...
|
unblock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-28-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. 20 years of bushes should disqualify all REPUBLICANS |
|
their repeatedly returning that crime family to the national ticket is clear evidence that the entire party is beyond redemption.
|
dos pelos
(224 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-28-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Is the USA a Bush/Clinton political duopoly?....... |
|
Are we so stagnant as a nation that is the best we can do? I think this political consolidation of power in fewer and fewer hands(Clintons,Bushes,Kennedys) correlates strongly to the economic stratification we have seen in the US in the last 30 years.Both wealth and political power are being concentrated in the hands of an elite and away from the broad masses of the people.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 24th 2013, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |