Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Was The GOP Point-Man On Health Care Reform??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:29 PM
Original message
This Was The GOP Point-Man On Health Care Reform??
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/20...

THIS WAS THE GOP POINT-MAN ON HEALTH CARE REFORM?.... Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) argued this morning that the Gang of Six could definitely have come to a bipartisan agreement on health care reform, if only those mean ol' Democrats have given the negotiations more time. Grassley told CNBC that with "another couple weeks," lawmakers would have reached the perfect deal.

Five months of pointless talks produced exactly zero GOP votes. But five-and-a-half months would have delivered a bill that "would have gotten broad-based support." (As Ezra Klein joked, "I was totally getting ready to propose, baby, if you'd only waited a couple more weeks...")

But that's not all. Grassley also lashed out at the White House this morning.

Grassley blasted accusations made by White House aides that his ultimately unsuccessful efforts to work on a bipartisan healthcare bill with committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and others were insincere.

"I kind of resent that, when I've been very candid with the president of the United States" about his positions on contentious issues in healthcare reform, Grassley said.

Grassley also took direct aim at President Barack Obama, suggesting that he soured the chances for cooperation.

"I'll tell you, there's some things that the president has said since then that I took very personally," Grassley said. "He gave some speeches during August in which he was associating me with efforts to make this a political document."

Grassley singled out David Axelrod, a senior adviser to Obama, for criticism. "We're accused by Axelrod of making political things and maybe not being serious in our negotiations," Grassley said. "You know, that's not a very good environment to carry on a conversation with the White House."


First of all, President Obama went to great lengths -- too many, in fact -- to praise Grassley publicly as someone who was sincere about negotiating in good faith. Why Grassley would take those comments "personally" is unclear.

Second of all, the reason the White House eventually gave up on Grassley is because administration officials are not insane. Why would anyone seriously believe Grassley was serious about reform after his conduct of the last several weeks?

Grassley has lashed out at the media with nonsensical whining; he said he wanted to undermine ambitious reform proposals because activists yelled at him in town-hall meetings; he vowed to defeat "Obamacare"; he nonsensically argued that the deficit "puts a stake in the heart" of Democratic proposals; he said, "I don't think it's going to be possible to work it out with the administration"; he promised not to vote for an "imperfect bill"; he validated "death panel" nonsense; and he said he was prepared to vote against his own compromise.

Grassley think he has grounds to be "resentful"? Everything would have been fine in "another couple weeks"? Please.


-Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Grassley, Ma'am, is a Lying Snake Who Needs To Find Himself In His Political Grave Next Year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jeez, what a crybaby Grassley is. Waaaaaaaah!! Waaaaaaaah!
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-17-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chuck Ghastly needs to be chucked.
Come on, Iowa, you can do it! I mean, a state that sends Harkin to the Senate can surely do better than Ghastly Grassley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep 23rd 2014, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC