|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
| kpete
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:23 AM Original message |
| Bush: "This cat isn't remotely qualified.-You think I wasn't qualified?-I was qualified." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| TankLV
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. No - you fucking clueless WAR CRMINAL - YOU were NOT qualified!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bluestateguy
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Al Gore had significantly more experience |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| begin_within
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. He means Socks |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| YOY
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. Yes Zippy. I think you weren't qualified. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| deutsey
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 24. And the let the help (i.e., American people) clean up your mess. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LeftinOH
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. How the f*ck was he "qualified"? Old money & family connections, thats "how". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dora
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 6. Narcissistic projection. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SammyWinstonJack
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 35. Clearly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| graywarrior
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. What, he's part of the beat generation now? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| moggie
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:28 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. Daddio! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| begin_within
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 16. He's a Dharma Bum, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| YOY
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 17. Squeeblydee bop she bop. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| deutsey
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 22. LOL... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| graywarrior
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:45 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 28. He IS like Maynard G. Krebs---allergic to WORK. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Quasimodem
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:52 AM Response to Reply #28 |
| 34. Maynard G. Krebs, at least, was amusing.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| graywarrior
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:58 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 36. No, he's more like Maynard G. Voldemort--but not as smart. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| peekaloo
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 33. *snort* DimWit slappin' some bongos while Pickles does interpretative |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| blm
|
Wed Sep-16-09 10:00 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 37. Can you dig it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MindPilot
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. Well, it IS a dangerous world -- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bdamomma
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 10. shouldn't he be in jail???? please. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stephanie
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. The Hillary remark is egregious as well |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 15. Yeah, well, folks here don't care about that shit. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dem629
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:34 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 20. What are we supposed to do about it? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Demeter
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. I Actually Agree--Neither Is Qualified |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| begin_within
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. Even after 8 years of being there, he still wasn't qualified. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. Just clueless. And narcicistic, however it's spelled. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Orsino
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. Therefore, he wasn't. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MindPilot
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. Hey, George! Have you noticed... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ixion
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. a qualifed war criminal, liar, awol jackass and assclown |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dem629
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. I'm beginning to think cats might be more qualified than any of these people. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RUMMYisFROSTED
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:39 AM Response to Reply #23 |
| 27. We tried that in 1988. :-( |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| graywarrior
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:48 AM Original message |
| LOL! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Toucano
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 25. "I'm smart enough. I'm good enough. And, doggonit, people like me!" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alsame
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 26. I take great pleasure in knowing that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JaneQPublic
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 29. To paraphrase Forest Gump... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sarge43
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 30. Think? We know you weren't qualified. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| euphoria12leo
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 31. A message for George W |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kentuck
|
Wed Sep-16-09 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
| 32. No, George. You were the most unqualified person to ever hold the office. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheMadMonk
|
Wed Sep-16-09 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. Isn't "cat" a rather dated term more often than not associated... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 21st 2013, 06:26 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC