Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA STRIP-MINING PICK BAD NEWS FOR COAL COUNTRY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:40 AM
Original message
OBAMA STRIP-MINING PICK BAD NEWS FOR COAL COUNTRY

http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1236


Industry-Friendly State Regulator Signals There Will Be No Crackdown on Abuses


President Obama’s choice to run the Office of Surface Mining signifies that campaign promises to end environmentally destructive coal mining practices, such as mountain-top removal, will be abandoned, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Placating the coal industry is evolving into the central plank of the administration’s environmental agenda.

In July, after months of internal wrangling, President Obama passed over some prominent mining reform candidates to select Joseph G. Pizarchik, a long-time Pennsylvania mining regulator to head the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation, and Enforcement (OSM). Pizarchik is well liked by industry and loathed by coal community groups and environmentalists, many of which are opposing his confirmation.

During his tenure at Pennsylvania’s Bureau of Mining and Reclamation, Pizarchik has hewn a solidly pro-industry line on topics such as acid mine drainage, subsidence from longwall mining and using mining slag as valley fill. In particular, Pizarchik has become a leading advocate for disposal of toxic industrial coal ash in coal mine sites, contending that it is a “beneficial use” of the same coal combustion waste involved in the disastrous TVA spill this past December.

Perhaps most disturbingly, during his August 6th confirmation hearing Pizarchik claimed ignorance on the issue of mountain-top removal or what changes the Obama administration might propose, since that mining technique is not widely used in his state. Given his industry orientation and the administration’s aversion to reformers, it would be more than mildly surprising for Pizarchik to ultimately take a strong environmental stand once confirmed. The Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources has yet to vote on his nomination.

-snip-

“OSM is a demoralized, hollowed-out agency and the prospects are it will stay that way,” Ruch added.
--------------------------------


why is Obama doing this?

have the coal Barons threatened to kidnap his children?

why Obama, why? tell us why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. ugh
disappointing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish he would stop doing things like this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Edit this down
Placating the coal industry is evolving into the central plank of the administration’s environmental agenda.

There, I think that describes just the kind of "change" we got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Too true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Sadly, you are 100% correct.
Sigh :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. this goes along with MonSatan Vilsack as
Sec'y of Agriculture.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. now they're not even pretending they're even trying to fulfill campaign "promises"
regarding the Afghanistan folly, we're told we shouldn't complain because Obama never promised anything different. What is the argument now? that he's playing intergalactic chess, calling their bluff, and that this will all be revealed as some big strategy for the environment?
I don't think so. I think it's more like the trojan horse strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. i wonder who really runs this country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. S O M E - F A C T S
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 01:46 PM by populistdriven
Coal is burned for 50% of all US electric power.

Carbon dioxide emitted by coal is only 25% of total US emissions of energy sector using fossil fuels and;

Carbon dioxide emitted by coal is only 30% of total US emissions of all energy sources including Nuclear and renewables.

So in order of effectiveness of lowering carbon dioxide emissions:

1. Solar
2. Wind
3. Renewable
4. Nuclear
5. COAL
6. Natural Gas
7. Oil

So if you are SERIOUS about stopping coal mining in the US fight like HELL for cap and trade to get passed because this is the only realistic way we can restructure our energy consumption.

Oh yea, your other choice is to take your left over duct tape and plastic sheeting and seal off half of your living space. Make sure you take either your fridge or all other electric kitchen appliances and place them in the sealed off area; also be sure you lower the water temp on your hot water heater to 94 degrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. WHAT??? I CAN'T READ WITH YOU SHOUTING AT ME!
Edited on Tue Sep-01-09 01:39 PM by Maru Kitteh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hate to tell you, "I told you so", but....
...I told you so.

Here's the entry (dated 2008) from my journal:
http://journals.democraticunderground.com/theHandpuppet/92
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Another GREAT appointment! WOOT!
Government of the corporation, by the corporation and for the corporation continues apace...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC