Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tulsa World editorial: Another round in the abortion battle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-23-09 10:41 AM
Original message
Tulsa World editorial: Another round in the abortion battle
Last Modified: 8/23/2009 4:17 AM

Abortion foes lost a battle last week in Oklahoma when a judge tossed out a controversial ultrasound requirement. But that's a minor setback when compared to the many access-curtailing victories they've scored in recent years.

But have these myriad new measures had the hoped-for effect of reducing the number of abortions performed in the U.S.?

Some new research is, to say the least, unsettling. Abortion restrictions may be fueling huge increases in drug-induced abortions, and causing women to delay abortions to a riskier point in the pregnancy. Restrictions also may be increasing the teen birth rate in a few spots. Most disturbing of all, the new restrictions are disproportionately impacting low-income and minority women, while higher-income white women still have little difficulty obtaining abortions.

Surely these are not the sorts of results abortion foes were seeking.

<snip>

An analysis by Rachel Benston Gold for the Guttmacher Institute, published earlier this year, concluded that measures aimed at dissuading women from having abortions "do not appear to be effective in ... materially reducing the number of procedures performed."

She cited a review of studies by Guttmacher, Ibis Reproductive Health and Baruch College which found that such measures "by and large ... do not prevent abortions." This review called the strategy "largely unsuccessful."

One "clear exception," they concluded, was disadvantaged women, who "often don't have the resources to navigate the hurdles" imposed by such restrictions.

Parental involvement laws "do little to affect the abortion rate," this trio concluded, with one possible exception: Such laws may have contributed to an increase in the teen birth rate in Texas where teens were not able to travel the distances required to access out-of-state services.

Read more

Related DU LBN thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC