Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2000 Poll: Nineteen percent of Americans said they were in the top 1 percent of wage earners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 04:52 PM
Original message
2000 Poll: Nineteen percent of Americans said they were in the top 1 percent of wage earners
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/july272009/american_money_dj_7-27-09.php

Jul-27-2009

(CALGARY, Alberta) - Americans believe, as part of their cultural mythology, that potentially anyone can get rich. Wealth really comes from three basic sources: You can win it, inherit it or be born in the right place at the right time.

None of these things are in your sphere of control, and if you know you are not in line to receive any inheritance, to believe that one of the other two will strike you, is self-delusional.

A study published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, found that only 2.7% of Americans receive $50,000 or more in inheritance; 91.9% receive nothing. Thus, the attempt by some conservatives to eliminate inheritance taxes—which, for PR, they always call "death taxes"—would take a huge bite out of government revenues for the benefit of less than 1% of the population. So, forget inheritance as a way to get rich.

People vote their aspirations, not their reality. In a poll during the 2000 election, people were asked if they were in the top 1 percent of earners. Nineteen percent of Americans said they were in the top 1 percent and another 20 percent expect to be someday. So immediately there is more than a third of Americans who don’t oppose tax cuts for the wealthy because they think it somehow does now, or will one day, apply to them.

Here are the real numbers. About 10% of families have incomes greater than $150,000. Three quarters are below $75,000. The largest concentration grouping is just over half with incomes between $30,000 and $75,000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow...that's Amazing.
We have some seriously stupid fucking people here and/or the question was worded oddly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. they're just like those Confederates in the Civil War
most Confederate soldiers didn't own slaves, but they fought for slavery because "one day" they might own slaves. America: the birthplace of ignorant false hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If The South had "won," their population would have been so diminished...
... the slaves would have been able to rise-up on their own and take over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. This info has been out there for years, but people love the American myth.
The other thing to take into account is location. Most people who make over $150,000 per year live in high-rent districts where jobs pay more. However, their buying power in those areas can actually be LESS than a person making $75,000 who lives in a low-rent district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. The problem is
that most young Americans don't seek out as a goal, to have a stable,middle class, comfortable lifestyle, anymore. Everything is "I am gonna be filthy rich one day" hence they don't want to tax the filthy rich since...you know...there gonna be one any day now. In the process, nobody fights for things like a living wage, better social security, health care, etc. Instead, they hold on to the bull crap belief that they will literally be shitting gold if they just wait it out. Meanwhile, as my grandmother liked to say, they like to "shit high," buying houses they can't afford, driving around in cars they can't afford, wearing clothes they can't afford etc etc and so on, hoping that keeping up the rich lifestyle appearances will lead to the real thing. Only, it doesn't and they end up flat broke, and have no welfare, no social security, no state funded health care to turn to, since all that is just for dirt poor people and not them...except now they're dirt poor and need it. Oh well.
They will continue to hold on to these fool hearty beliefs in a death grip until they are literally facing death pushing 100, they will still mumble despite senility that "they're gonna be filthy rich one day, you'll see."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. 85% of men said their penises were above-average, too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yep. For years, I've wanted to have an 8" penis.
Finally, my wife told me to fold it in half. It worked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teranchala Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. And now you can't tell whether you're coming or going!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vincna Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Perfect!
If you didn't pos it, I would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlyDemocrat Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Many people felt rich in 2000, because they were rich in 2000 (booming Clinton economy)
The average income for the 20th percentile was almost $20,000, a figure not reached since in real dollars.

Incomes for the poor was growing, as a percentage, faster than the rich for the first time since the 1960s.

People felt that anybody could get rich in 2000, because anybody could get rich in 2000.

Though there may be subsequently deleterious public policy consequences, I wish 20% of Americans can feel they are in the top 1% once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. good point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. People exaggerate about themselves a lot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones Dubya went after.
What fools.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is why it always bugs me when Dems cite taxes that will only affect the top x% of taxpayers
because far too many people will think that they belong to that percentage. They're not quite so bad about that anymore, and give actual dollar values that people can compare with their own income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. The moran country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Horatio Alger. Believe it at your own peril.
"It's called Capituhlism. Yew don't like yer lot in life, yew hafta WERK HAWRDER!!"

The joke is I'm not kidding. This is exactly what those assvacuums believe. That if we just worked a little bit harder than we're already working, we'll be rich someday too!!

Reality, however, proves to be a nice cold sledgehammer to the balls.

Despite Sowell’s insistence that tax brackets tell the real story of income distribution and economic mobility, the increasing wealth disparities between upper-class and working-class Americans confirm that indeed, the rich are getting richer at the expense of the rest of the U.S. population.

The real median income on has increased steadily since 1947, from $22,000 to just over $50,000 in 2003. Since 1979 then incredibly divergent income patterns have developed between the rich and the poor. There has been an almost negligible growth for the median and 20th percentile, with explosive growth at the top 95th percentile. The increase in income inequality since the 1970s can be described as the middle class squeeze, with the greatest changes in the bottom third and the top third. In the bottom third, income is generally as it was almost 30 years ago. The top 1% of the population have seen their incomes more than double. Among the poorest people, income grew during 1995 and 2004 due to the increase in annual hours worked, but the increase was very small. The opposite is true for the elite. According to Gregory Mantsios, director of Working Education at CUNY, “the wealthiest 20 percent of the American population holds 85 percent of the total household wealth in the country,” a statistic that does not offer much hope for the remaining percentage of the population.<10>

The poor are becoming poorer and owing more money. In 1985, the average working-class citizen owed $500, compared to $8,000 today. For the top 5%, wealth (income and assets) has increased from about $500,000 to about $1,000,000. In 2005, the average family had a net worth of $80,000. The poverty level is also much too low for the Horatio Alger myth to be applied in modern society: “a total of 14 percent of the American population – that is, one of every seven – live below the government’s official poverty line (calculated in 1996 at $7,992 for an individual and $16,209 for a family of four)”.<11>

(snip)

Evidently, as Dalton proclaimed, we are living in an era of diminished opportunities for most; this is especially true for minorities and women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. And all their children are above average. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. And yet the over $200,000 income voters voted 52% for Obama
And that was after he said he would end their Bush tax cuts.

Last October I walked precincts for Obama with an 18 year old girl from a well to do family. She and her parents would be likely to pay some of those higher taxes (yes her parents were for Obama too). We went door to door in a trailer park community, and found half of the people said they were voting for McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. I've heard that before and it always blows my mind.
I just don't understand how so many people think that they are so rich. And yes, that's a big part of why so many people vote against their own best interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC