|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
| inna
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:46 PM Original message |
| "so help me god"?? separation of church and state, anyone?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| ProdigalJunkMail
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. did you ever consider SHE might believe? and that portion of HER oath |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 6. she was repeating, word in word, after Roberts. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProdigalJunkMail
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. i would bet dollars to doughnuts that SHE had all the choice there |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 10. "I imagine if she wanted to go without it, she could have." - unfortunately, she could NOT have. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProdigalJunkMail
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 14. there are atheist in congress who avoid the 'so help me god' |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stray cat
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 17. Are your sure she legally can't skip it word - my understanding is it was her call |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LiberalAndProud
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. If there is God, I hope she helps Justice Sotomayor. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:34 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 24. so do i. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Obamanaut
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. If one is a believer, then what does it hurt, really? If a non believer, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sarah Ibarruri
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. Separation of church and state is DESPERATELY needed in this country! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProdigalJunkMail
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. and THIS is NOT an example of where it is a problem n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lib_wit_it
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. I totally agree with you. It sucks that to make an issue of it, even to ask to have it left out, if |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stray cat
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:04 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 15. Its actually pretty separate just as demanded in the constitution |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| seeviewonder
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 26. How is it "pretty separate?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlooInBloo
|
Sat Aug-08-09 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Oh awesome! Everything else in the country is absolutely perfect! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 12. lol! dearest Boo in Blue, your post makes absolutely no sense in relation to the op. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WeDidIt
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. It was HER choice |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 20. "It was HER choice" - prove it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProdigalJunkMail
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:12 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 21. nah you just wanted to make a little stink...congrats |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 22. lol, very effective riposte. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| seeviewonder
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 27. I am with you on this even though the "righteous" among us on DU are not! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| stray cat
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Can't I swear by the most important thing I can personally swear by? - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ProdigalJunkMail
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 16. you could swear on the Oxford Dictionary of the English Language if you wanted... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bucky
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 19. I'm not sure. If I ever got appointed to the Supreme Court, could I swear on Sigourney Weaver? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bucky
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. You are well within you rights to be irked by this. I'm within my rights not to be. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| inna
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:25 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 23. "I feel the same way about people who use the nonword "irregardless."" - or, "anyways"!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| seeviewonder
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. I don't think anyone should have to put their hand on a Bible because they are forced. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cloudbase
|
Sat Aug-08-09 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. It doesn't acknowledge any particular religion, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GodlyDemocrat
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. Maybe's she's a Catholic that believes in God |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arkana
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. Blame General Washington for that one. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BrklynLiberal
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. That may be a genie that will not go quietly back into the bottle.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hekate
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. She, like every other citizen, has the choice of "affirming." Some religions forbid oaths, too... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sakabatou
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. The line, "so help me God," doesn't need to be said |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Time for change
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. I agree |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| backwoodsbob
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. high school football starts in three weeks |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| seeviewonder
|
Sat Aug-08-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 38. As a matter of fact, I would love to see you do that. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| saltpoint
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. Still she stays on with a love of some kind / It's the lady's choice / |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| silverweb
|
Sat Aug-08-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. It's up to the person being sworn in. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Enthusiast
|
Sun Aug-09-09 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 39. I hate it but |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Jun 18th 2013, 02:12 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC