432
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

WP, Froomkin, "The Next Bush Scandal": RNC e-mail accounts (Rove aide Ralston had at least four)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 12:43 AM
Original message
WP, Froomkin, "The Next Bush Scandal": RNC e-mail accounts (Rove aide Ralston had at least four)
The Next Bush Scandal?
By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Tuesday, April 10, 2007

The slowly-unfolding disclosure that some White House aides use non-government e-mail servers to conduct official business may soon be reaching scandal proportions.

As John D. McKinnon writes in today's Wall Street Journal: "The widespread use of private email accounts by some top White House officials is sparking a congressional probe into the practice and whether it violates a post-Nixon law requiring that White House deliberations be documented.

"A top Democratic lawmaker says outside email accounts were used in an attempt to avoid scrutiny; the White House says their purpose was to avoid using government resources for political activities, although they were used to discuss the firing of U.S. attorneys."

Most of the e-mail accounts at issue are on Republican National Committee servers. For instance: "Susan Ralston, until recently presidential adviser Karl Rove's assistant at the White House, appears to have used at least four outside email accounts: a 'gwb' domain account, a 'georgewbush.com' account, and an 'rnchq.org' account -- all run by the RNC -- plus an AOL account. She once emailed two associates of lobbyist Jack Abramoff, 'I now have an RNC blackberry which you can use to e-mail me at any time. No security issues like my WH email.' . . .

"'At the end of the day, it looks like they were trying to avoid the records act . . . by operating official business off the official systems,' said John Podesta, who worked in the White House for the entire Clinton presidency, including a stint as chief of staff. . . .

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2007/...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   I wonder  DearAbby   Apr-11-07 02:13 AM   #1 
   Yes, they used them for all their shady dealings -- and that's quite a lot  Jack Rabbit   Apr-11-07 02:21 AM   #2 
   As I said a few days ago  NewJeffCT   Apr-11-07 08:25 AM   #9 
   The devices themselves are LESS important as the data on the email server..  paparush   Apr-11-07 09:53 AM   #18 
   I hope  disndat   Apr-11-07 07:44 PM   #48 
   As I recall, the government has a dismal record in keeping  yy4me   Apr-11-07 02:00 PM   #44 
   From your keyboard  DearAbby   Apr-11-07 01:42 PM   #43 
   From your keyboard to some deity's ears!  tbyg52   Apr-11-07 08:30 PM   #53 
   I have said this before..  hang a left   Apr-11-07 08:29 AM   #11 
   Those email servers were probably scrubbed  smtpgirl   Apr-11-07 06:19 PM   #46 
      Someone who knows what they are talking about  tbyg52   Apr-11-07 08:38 PM   #54 
   "I am not a crook" - Nixon  19jet54   Apr-11-07 02:50 AM   #3 
   I wonder if * will crack like Nixon too.  Winebrat   Apr-11-07 06:59 AM   #6 
      I'm not sure they will  NewJeffCT   Apr-11-07 08:27 AM   #10 
      Just call him George W. Nixon  wicket   Apr-11-07 11:01 AM   #30 
         Except When Nixon wasn't busy being a crook...  polmaven   Apr-11-07 12:08 PM   #38 
   Geez, talk about not being (White) House Broken  StClone   Apr-11-07 05:50 AM   #4 
   And yet  PurpleChez   Apr-11-07 06:46 AM   #5 
      Amazing, isn't it? One third of the people enjoy being lied to, lying to themselves, and lying to  E-Z-B   Apr-11-07 08:46 AM   #13 
      Or, that they've adopted the idea  PurpleChez   Apr-11-07 12:42 PM   #40 
      1/3 of the population can't  zidzi   Apr-11-07 07:48 PM   #50 
      This is just another example of how they are bringing integrity  Arkansas Granny   Apr-11-07 08:56 AM   #15 
   I guess they consider voter suppresion a political activity  formercia   Apr-11-07 07:08 AM   #7 
   I told you assholes that they would ask for your copy  formercia   Apr-11-07 07:38 AM   #8 
   Americans need to know the truth  ArmchairMeme   Apr-11-07 08:33 AM   #12 
   "No security issues like my WH email."  htuttle   Apr-11-07 08:55 AM   #14 
   no security issues = free to discuss anything..  frylock   Apr-11-07 11:05 AM   #31 
      Exactly  htuttle   Apr-11-07 11:13 AM   #33 
   How long, oh Lord, how long?  Kurovski   Apr-11-07 09:08 AM   #16 
   I believe the Administration... and it's sad.  johnlal   Apr-11-07 09:20 AM   #17 
   As proved by their assertion that they used the RNC systems  Jackpine Radical   Apr-11-07 10:31 AM   #23 
   What a stunning admission that was. Gaining power and money for the GOP crime family  donkeyotay   Apr-11-07 10:42 AM   #25 
   It isn't the crime - it's the cover-up  debbierlus   Apr-11-07 09:55 AM   #19 
   Look on the bright side!!  Norquist Nemesis   Apr-11-07 10:03 AM   #20 
   their excuse for committing one crime is that they were acctually committing a different one?  librechik   Apr-11-07 10:21 AM   #21 
   Which shows that they were aware of the laws, and they deliberately  loudsue   Apr-11-07 01:31 PM   #41 
   Some interesting research by others  JPZenger   Apr-11-07 10:29 AM   #22 
   check out govtechsolutions.com  formercia   Apr-11-07 11:01 AM   #29 
   4 domains got my attention.  DAMANgoldberg   Apr-11-07 12:35 PM   #39 
   Yet another GOP coverup tactic  Zambero   Apr-11-07 10:42 AM   #24 
   Who wants to be the first to send an email to  junkiebrewster   Apr-11-07 10:49 AM   #26 
   no security emails is just code for no oversight!!!  Supersedeas   Apr-11-07 10:50 AM   #27 
   Nothing will happen to these assholes  ejbr   Apr-11-07 10:53 AM   #28 
   The E-Mails Will Be Bush's "White House Tapes"  ThomWV   Apr-11-07 11:07 AM   #32 
   "No security issues like my WH email."  gatorboy   Apr-11-07 11:15 AM   #34 
   Burn baby burn  upperleftedge   Apr-11-07 11:29 AM   #35 
   What Would the Security Issues Be?  ribofunk   Apr-13-07 11:22 AM   #59 
   Subversion?  Na Gael   Apr-11-07 11:40 AM   #36 
   Didn't Waxman request these RNC emails, and shouldn't he  Marr   Apr-11-07 11:48 AM   #37 
   What will it take for the 29% to say enough is enough???  IWantAChange   Apr-11-07 01:33 PM   #42 
   It's obvious 29% AREN'T PAYING ATTENTION AT ALL!!  johnnyrocket   Apr-11-07 11:31 PM   #57 
   RICO RICO RICO  NBachers   Apr-11-07 04:48 PM   #45 
   Kick. (nt)  Kurovski   Apr-11-07 07:17 PM   #47 
   Of course they don't want  zidzi   Apr-11-07 07:46 PM   #49 
   Gee! It seems they've gone "missing". . .  annabanana   Apr-11-07 08:01 PM   #51 
   Emails Destroyed  Ahgoo   Apr-11-07 08:03 PM   #52 
   MORE RICO  KingBob   Apr-11-07 09:36 PM   #55 
   How many pillars does this Whitehouse have?  johnnyrocket   Apr-11-07 11:29 PM   #56 
   This is good  ProudDad   Apr-12-07 02:42 AM   #58 
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder
If Fitzgerald is interested in the multiple email servers? They probably used them for all their shady dealings... :popcorn:

regardless, I am going to watch this with interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, they used them for all their shady dealings -- and that's quite a lot
Things things will turn out more lethal to the Bush regime than the tapes were to Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. As I said a few days ago
I hope these laptops & blackberries are secured, and that the emails are retrievable.

I can see it now, "All the laptops and blackberries were incinerated a few days ago. It was all the fault of a low-level staffer. So sorry, but we'll make sure we give them a nice stern talking to..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. The devices themselves are LESS important as the data on the email server..
If the server hasn't been wiped then all the records are there. So, you have the sender's email server and the receiver's email server.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disndat Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
48. I hope
Conyers and Leahy made sure the email servers were secured before announcing their intention to subpoena the DOJ and RNC email laptops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
44. As I recall, the government has a dismal record in keeping
track of their laptops. I wonder if the important ones in this cast were "lost"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
43. From your keyboard
to the great diety's monitor! :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
53. From your keyboard to some deity's ears!
And I'm an atheist.... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. I have said this before..
I think that Fitz was the first one to discover them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smtpgirl (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. Those email servers were probably scrubbed
long ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Someone who knows what they are talking about
Edited on Wed Apr-11-07 08:38 PM by tbyg52
says that doesn't matter:

Noooooo! I thought I bookmarked it! Anyway, the gist of it is that is would be impossible to *completely* disappear *all* of them, and that a great deal could be recovered by a determined party.

Yaaaaaaay! Found it!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
19jet54 (737 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. "I am not a crook" - Nixon
You know, most of these guys were trained by Nixon - No wonder they behave like crooks, sneaks & liars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I wonder if * will crack like Nixon too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'm not sure they will
I think deep down, Nixon did have a soul and a conscience. I'm not sure I could say that about Bush & Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. Just call him George W. Nixon


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Except When Nixon wasn't busy being a crook...
he actually accomplished some things that were beneficial to the country.

I guess Cheney and company hadn't yet perfected their systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Geez, talk about not being (White) House Broken
From start to finish these crooks have no use for accepted laws, rules or precedent. Wonder if Rove pees in the potted plants because he feels like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And yet
they are still able to convince a third of the population that they represent the rule of law, morality, and all that other BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E-Z-B (397 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Amazing, isn't it? One third of the people enjoy being lied to, lying to themselves, and lying to
others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
40. Or, that they've adopted the idea
that the morality of an action is defined by who is acting rather than by the nature of the action. In other words, if * ate a baby it would become moral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
50. 1/3 of the population can't
admit they made a mistake like first fuckhead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. This is just another example of how they are bringing integrity
back to the White House. Their version of integrity, at least.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. I guess they consider voter suppresion a political activity
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I told you assholes that they would ask for your copy
time's up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArmchairMeme (390 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Americans need to know the truth
I wonder how many Americans are aware of this law?

"As John D. McKinnon writes in today's Wall Street Journal: "The widespread use of private email accounts by some top White House officials is sparking a congressional probe into the practice and whether it violates a post-Nixon law requiring that White House deliberations be documented."

Until I read it here at DU I was not aware that a law had been put in place to require the WH to document the communications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. "No security issues like my WH email."
That phrase keeps echoing in my mind. Are there really security issues with the WH email system? I'd have assumed it was one of the more secure systems on the planet, maybe even tempest-shielded to prevent foreign intelligence agencies from parking a van outside and reading the screens.

And yet they consider AOL and Blackberry mails to be "more secure"? I guess the question is: Secure from whom?

Really gives you some insight into the conspiratorial mindset of these racketeers, when you think about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. no security issues = free to discuss anything..
I think in this context what she meant by "security issues" was that the emails wouldn't be monitored as closely as the WH mail server might.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Exactly
They were more worried about being monitored by Congressional oversight committees than by foreign intelligence agencies!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. How long, oh Lord, how long?
Impeach, indict, imprison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnlal (935 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
17. I believe the Administration... and it's sad.
I believe it when they say that they used the RNC e-mail accounts to avoid doing political work on official computers. However, that's only because every single piece of business, every policy decision, every budget item, every deployment of troops, every single thing the president does in office is related to the politics of the Republican party. Policy and politics cannot be separated in this administration. Kyle Sampson stated the Administration's position clearly:
"The distinction between 'political' and 'performance-related' reasons for removing a United States attorney is, in my view, largely artificial"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. As proved by their assertion that they used the RNC systems
"to avoid using government resources for political activities, although they were used to discuss the firing of U.S. attorneys."

A flat-out fact: The firings were political.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. What a stunning admission that was. Gaining power and money for the GOP crime family
and the business of governing the nation are indistinguishable, and that is the problem:

"The distinction between 'political' and 'performance-related' reasons for removing a United States attorney is, in my view, largely artificial"

Can't tell the difference, Kyle? What was that thingie that your department was named after? Something about a rule or a law? Somekindof equality, representative government...or a Pat Robert's insider's crackpot school of theocracy of, by and for the GOP who know better than everyone else and just happen to be getting rich off this whole disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. It isn't the crime - it's the cover-up


And, the hubris. They NEVER thought the dems would win the Congress. And, now they are screwed.

Scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. Look on the bright side!!
Given the Bush Admins' level of incompetence so far, I doubt they've 'wiped' everything clean. It might take a handful of forensic specialists to dig out the info/docs, but it's still there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. their excuse for committing one crime is that they were acctually committing a different one?
and as I recall, this is not the first time their lawyers have taken this route.

Wow.

snip

White House officials dispute the criticisms, saying the purpose of the RNC accounts has been to avoid running afoul of another federal law, the Hatch Act. It prohibits many federal officials from engaging in political activity on government time or with government resources."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. Which shows that they were aware of the laws, and they deliberately
disobeyed those laws.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. Some interesting research by others
TPmuckracker covered this story also, and some of their participants did some research that is posted under their comment section right beneath the article on the following link:

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002771.php

One of the comments included the following:

"Domains sharing mail servers with gwb43.com:

bcorker.com
bobcorkerforsenate.com
consultmhi.com
georgewbush.com
gop.com
gop.net
gop.org
gopcontact.com
gopemail.com
gopteamleader.com
govtechsolutions.com
gwb43.com
newt.org
ohiogop.org
republicanvictoryteam.com
republicanvictoryteam.net
republicanvictoryteam.org
rga.org
ricksantorum.com
rnc.org
rnchq.org
socialsecurityblueprint.com
speakergingrich.com
speakergingrich.net
technomania.com
thehuntercompanies.com
thirdwave2.com
thirdwave2.net
winningwomen.com
wrcb.com
wrcb.net

SOURCE: http://www.robtex.com/dns/gwb43.com.html "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. check out govtechsolutions.com
http://www.govtechsolutions.com/clients.asp

http://judiciary.house.gov /

http://www.govtechsolutions.com/clients.asp

2006 CMF Silver Mouse Award Recipient
With the complex information that the Judiciary Committee presents, the website and content management system needed to be customized to meet their specific requirements. GovTech Solutions conducted staff interviews on the legislative process of the committee. After the creation of the architecture of the information, five templates were designed in a 1024x768 resolution for a more progressive look. The development phase by top technical resources utilized the latest technologies to ensure the success of the site. The website launched in November, 2005. GovTech Solutions continues to support the site through an Online Services Package.

I wonder if they have access to the databases too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAMANgoldberg Donating Member (263 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. 4 domains got my attention.
bcorker.com
bobcorkerforsenate.com
wrcb.com
wrcb.net

Bob Corker (R-TN) was mayor of Chattanooga, WRCB-TV 3 is the NBC affiliate for Chattanooga. I used to work for a "square burger" company headquartered in Chattanooga and spent plenty of time there. I had a chance to watch 3, 9, and 12 newscasts. Now it make sense how 3 is very slanted to right and devoid of diversity unlike 12 and especially 9. Now it all comes together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
24. Yet another GOP coverup tactic
You could almost call this "Real Time" coverup. Routinely keep the people's business off the record so that no one (especilly Congress) can ever obtain official gov't records or exercise oversight of your activities. What the heck, there's so much that can be gotten away with, given a bit of creative skullduggery from the likes of Uncle Karl and his crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
junkiebrewster (362 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
26. Who wants to be the first to send an email to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
27. no security emails is just code for no oversight!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
28. Nothing will happen to these assholes
The MSM will gloss over it, talk more about Anna Nicole's baby and move on to how Democrats are undermining the troops and are acting against the polls. If nothing else, they will help the Republican talking heads to spread the lie that Clinton did it too. Nothing to see here folks, move along. The same shit that has occurred over the last 7 years. Since Rove & Co. got a pass on their treasonous behavior because "no one was charged on the underlying crime" by a U.S. Attorney whose job was most likely threatened (where Jason Leopold's credibility was ruined because Fitz is a fucking weasly piece of shit, in my humble opinion), I have lost faith in my country and will not be holding my breathe even with all the overwhelming evidence.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
32. The E-Mails Will Be Bush's "White House Tapes"
They will tell the story and they will be the death of this Administration and the criminals who make it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
34. "No security issues like my WH email."
Well, that about says it all, doesn't it?

Enough with this slow roast. Time to put wood on the flames and smoke these fuckers OUT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upperleftedge (93 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Burn baby burn
What more can we possibly need to impeach these people? Obstruction of justice, perjury, and incompetence. Kids dying everyday in an illegal and immoral war. Pour gasoline on that fire while it is still cheap enough. Impeachment doesn't just need to be on the table, it needs to be on the plate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Apr-13-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #34
59. What Would the Security Issues Be?
That phrase doesn't sound like someone attempting to hide official secrets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Na Gael (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
36. Subversion?
Isn't this essentially subversion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. Didn't Waxman request these RNC emails, and shouldn't he
have received them by now? Seems like it was for last Thursday, IIRC. But I could be wrong. Anyone heard anything on that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange (974 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
42. What will it take for the 29% to say enough is enough???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnyrocket (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
57. It's obvious 29% AREN'T PAYING ATTENTION AT ALL!!
At all, at all! Clueless idiots, dangerous enablers. Fucking ignorant assholes.

May they get a clue, some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
45. RICO RICO RICO
How long will it be before RICO charges are brought against these mobsters? We've been honing the RICO statutes; the conspiracy statutes, and the Continuing Criminal Enterprise statutes in our failed Drug War for the last thirty-five years. Let's put them to work cleaning the Republican scum out of public life and into prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
47. Kick. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
49. Of course they don't want
their shit documented. I'm shocked at how many wh emails get supeoned as it is!

So they think they're getting all clever and now they're getting busted again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Apr-11-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
51. Gee! It seems they've gone "missing". . .
Who would've thought they might go "missing"?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ahgoo (55 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
52. Emails Destroyed
Yup that's what the WH is saying. If I knew how to link I would but go see Talking Points Memo - this was just out on the AP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingBob (37 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. MORE RICO
Since these bozos (WH & RNC) are regularly violating the Presidential Records Act, I wonder if there is a US Attorney left with any brass ones left willing to look at RICO. Not only for violating the Records Act, but also conspiracy.

Remember when Morris Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center sued the KKK and won. The settlement was for all of the assets the KKK owned. Gee, will that mean the RNC will be owned lock, stock, and barrel by us poor citizens? Maybe we can use the assets to pay down the BU$HCO debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnyrocket (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr-11-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
56. How many pillars does this Whitehouse have?
They're being knocked down weekly, but somehow Bush needs his 'Imus' moment...so this all comes crashing down.


Let's hope it's sooner rather than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr-12-07 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
58. This is good
Just as ollie north found out that deleting files doesn't really delete them I suspect the rnc will be finding out that the internet never forgets...

Twisting in the wind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb 10th 2010, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC