Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

****One More Time***** Unrecommend means it is a vote against the thread going to the Greatest Page

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:28 PM
Original message
****One More Time***** Unrecommend means it is a vote against the thread going to the Greatest Page
It doesn't necessarily mean that a post doesn't have merit.
It doesn't necessarily mean that a person disagrees with your post.

There are PLENTY of posts that have merit and that are awesome and that people agree with but that doesn't mean that it needs to be on the greatest page.

It doesn't mean that the post will vanish.
It doesn't mean that people don't like you.
It doesn't mean that your efforts will go unnoticed.

Can we get that straight? I don't know why people think that it means more then it does. It just means that someone doesn't think it belongs on the greatest page. Not that they don't agree with you, or that they want to kill health care reform, or that they are a birther...just means hey only so much room on greatest...so not this one.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&U !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. CALL CONGRESS RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!1!
:sarcasm:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. And tell them to write a law to stop the Unrecommendation of threads on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess now we know who's doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I think I told y'all last week if you needed someone to blame for unrec blame me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
66. STOP MAKING ME BLAME YOU! DAMNIT!1!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. THIS IS THE SERIES!!!!!!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lastly, the first rule of Unrec Club is
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 02:32 PM by CJCRANE
you do not stop talking about unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. When trolls unrec an important story - it sucks the big one
Last night I posted about how Clinton was on his way to North Korea to help free the two journalists and it was unrec'd immediately. Immediately.

Let me say it one more time - The troll who unrec'd that thread can kiss my fat ass. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Well how many more posts were there on the subject already on the greatest page?
Maybe that was it.

Maybe it just had a link to the story and that was it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I was the first to post about it
So no, it's not what you suppose in my case.

IMO, it was troll who used what I view as a vile, little tool embraced by the immature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. OK but seriously, still a good thread, still people read it. Why get angry?
The worse thing that could happen is that your post didn't go to GP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. I absolutely hate the anonymous negativity
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 02:51 PM by eleny
It so goes against my grain. I wasn't raised to be a sneaky little fucker.

And I believe that if the identity of the unrec was public, people wouldn't be so fast on the trigger. But I haven't asked Skinner for that. I just want the stupid, immature deal gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. OK. How about this. If you get Unrec again. PM me and yell @ me.
Then you can have someone to yell @ about it.

I don't care. I love getting PMs. You can always blame and yell @ me it won't bother me a bit. I'm serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. I can understand why you don't have a sensible, straight forward response....
The Unrec feature has messed with your mind!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Or I'm into eS&M.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Not my bag!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. This is an example of what I posted about this morning
On a perfectly good post, not a contentious point, and unrec'd within seconds of being posted, with no explanation. In my little mind, if I don't believe a post should be on the greatest page, I simply don't give it a rec. I rarely have unrec'd anything, except those I thought obvious trolls. Later, I would check back, and most of them were TS'ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. I don't care if my threads make it to the greatest page
But I do find it galling when an important story gets the unrec immediately.

In the six years I've been here I can't remember another feature getting the negative response that unrec has gotten. I know it has its many fans. But I just can't recall a new feature causing contention like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. You're not the arbiter of "important".
Note: I didn't even see your post, much less unrec it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. I posted that Clinton was on his way to North Korea to secure the release of the 2 journalists
Yeah, I decided that it was "important".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #41
48. In your opinion, it was important.
While I'd agree with you that this story is important (and if you link it, I'd be happy to recommend it), that doesn't make it important to everyone. You do not get to decide that, which is the entire point of rec/unrec.

If more people think it's important than not, it'll be on the greatest. Otherwise, it won't. It's pretty simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. as I said in this thread, I don't care about making it to the greatest
I found it galling that someone unrec'd it almost immediately upon it being posted to DU last night. that's it pure and simple.

Now, about this story in particular - get real already. Don't lecture me about how some might not think it's an important event and story. You know better. And the unrec feature used in this instance smells of pure troll bullshit. The greatest page isn't the issue at all. I'm convinced that it was right wing trolls trying to bury the good news of the impending release of the journalists. And I hate that crap.

Please take the last word. I'm done with what you're pushing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. It might be bullshit, but other real DUers can still pump it up.
It's not like unrec'ing prevents that from happening. And beyond not being on the greatest page, the feature has no ability to "bury" anything, so I don't see your point if you're truly claiming you don't care about the greatest page. It doesn't sink a thread, it doesn't hide a thread - it does nothing except make it qualify or not qualify for greatest. That's it.

Get all self-righteous if you want, but you're either not understanding the feature or you're just proselytizing. Either way, you've got the wrong idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Some people worry far too much what a bunch of anonymous schlubs on the internet think of them.
It is a discussion forum! They just need to DISCUSS, already, and stop trying to resolve their lack-of-popularity issues from their Junior High School days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. So freakin true! As if the Pulitzer prize team was patroling the board for new winners.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
73. I don't even think we could persuade the Publisher's Clearinghouse Prize Patrol to come around here!
Never mind the Pulitzer Prize team!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R. I'm slow, and I understood this post. Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. The rec and unrec buttons are too close together
Unless Im wearing my glasses I sometimes hit the wrong one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I've done it twice myself.
I should slow down and practice safe DU - unreccus interruptus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. As a matter of transparency the votes toward both should be reflected,
to give the most accurate view of D.U.'s perspective on any issue, subject or candidate, there is a large difference in intensity and feeling between 200 rec/pro 205 unrec/anti vs 5 rec/pro and 10 unrec/anti.

Furthermore if a thread has a <0 and you rec it, there very likely will be no visual affirmation of your vote and for a group of people that fought so hard for electoral reform where every vote counts, paper trails and such, I find this especially ironic and somewhat tragic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Yes. And that the feature clearly doesn't illustrate DU's perspective on any issue....
...and that the site's owners obviously want it that way and implemented the option as such....

What are we to infer from that?

Thus far it's been a divisive feature that's yet to have a credible explanation - especially re how the unrec votes are not displayed as well. Something very suspect in that decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. I heard they gave a 2 hour trial to both being reflected, but I missed it. n/t
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 02:56 PM by Uncle Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. I will tell you what I hit wrong, and it has nothing to do with vision
I am constantly hitting the CAPS LOCK key instead of TAB. The reason you don't see me posting in caps very much, is because I remove the caps lock key from all my keyboards. Problem solved.

In your case, you probably need to double-check before you click.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
61. I've hit the wrong one a few times myself
But it's not like I'm sitting in a missile silo someplace ready to start The Big One. Life goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think it could easily mean many of those things
At least for me, I am unreccing something because I think it does not have merit, and because I strongly disagree with the post. It could mean that I don't like the person making the post, but why wouldn't my opinion change if a person that I don't like makes an excellent post it would be ridiculous to unrec it out of spite. There are not too many here that I dislike anyway. If there are, they are probably on ignore, but I don't really dislike the people I ignore, I just don't want to read their insults or be tempted into the proven foolish task of trying to reason with them or have a civil discussion. I don't know them or care about them enough to actually dislike them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Seems to me the only people who make it about all that, would use it as such...which is ROFL
because the worst that could happen is that it doesn't go to the greatest page.

Ohhhhhh THE HORRAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
46. well that might mean fewer readers
and it does kinda suck to put a fair amount of work into some writing only to have very few people read it. Not that that ever happens on DU http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. I don't think it does. If People like the subject of the thread they will read it.
I don't think people go all the way over to see if it has any unrecs first...then decide.

That would be dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #50
69. sometimes you don't see the subject
There is a title, which may not tell you anything. There's also the front page. When I first come to DU, my link takes me to the front page. There are threads with the greatest number of R's. I read many of them and usually (not always) find them to be excellent. Then with others a title may not tell me much and the author is not that familiar, but it does have ten recs, so I am more likely to click on that thread to see what people thought was so great. A higher number of recs simply does make a post stand out in a crowd.

To an extent they also say "I am DU and I approve this message". Which is why I like the unrec. It allows me to go beyond posting reply #48 which is likely to not be read, but also to vote 'this is crap'.

The complaint, is, logically, that it also gives the same power to rightwing trolls. They will vote something down as 'crap' if it bashes Republicans or defends Obama or liberal values.

Of course, in the minds of some, I have just said the same thing twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I felt the spirit move me. It may have been gas, I don't know. They feel sooo similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Holy shit - I never knew how religious I was!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I carry my own warm summah breeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. It means 'you remind me of the kid who took my lunch money in fourth grade'.



Or it might mean I didn't get enough sleep last night ... or that I'm having a bout with acid indigestion
right now ... or maybe my dog gave me a dirty look. I guess the criteria can vary from time to time. :shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
30. Some people see the worst part of themselves in others.
It's rather remarkable that it can so often be seen that those who concoct the worst, most self-serving and malicious reasons for others to 'unrec' a thread, are themselves far too often engaged in similarly adversarial behavior. It's really ironic. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. DING DING DING! You said the the best way it could have been said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. I could not care less about the "greatest page"
I've probably only visited it 3 times in the 3-4 years that I have been aware of DU, and those times only out of curiosity of what people were whining about re the unrec feature. I unrec if I don't like a post, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. OK. But the most you are getting is that it doesn't go to the greatest. So basically
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 03:11 PM by xultar
you're wasting your time because people don't give a shit about the greatest page.

:rofl:

Right now Unrec gives you power because you think people see it as a diss of their post and it makes them all upset.

When they really get what it means...you won't bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. earthspeak, please. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. ROFL...I guess I was more hungry than I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. Thanks for the explanation
Do you think that there are not "trolls" here who can anonomously unrec posts? Or DUer's that are in a snit, or feel superior and condescending or have a personal beef with another DUer? I have seen several posters get the pizza in the last week or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. If people know what it means...I mean really know then it won't bug them so much
when they get one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TokenQueer Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
42. ROFLMAO! (passes xultar the bottle of rum)
....and I unrec'ed this shit.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. New drink.... right here give it a try
Bacardi Lite
Myers Dark
Peach Schnapps
Peach Juice
Pineapple Juice
Orange Juice
Grenadine Float

Ummm ummm ummmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TokenQueer Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. That's a Planter's Punch...
...sorta. Yummmmm.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. I gotta look that up. You know, there's an app for that. ROFL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
43. As soon as I see the **unrecommend** birth certificate, I'll use it
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
51. I agree. But there is grudge unrec. I could post that everyone actually gets a pony for real & it
would be unrec'd because there's a hard core Trotskyite mob who think that anyone who discusses economics with real numbers is a Goldman Sachs shill.

But at this point, I don't give a shit about being on the GP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. And as soon as no one gives a shit...it'll die down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
52. Too many take it personal
Too many want their shit on the greatest and if it does not get there it must be because their enemies are ganging up against them to keep them off... :eyes:

K&R :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
58. But does it mean that my post will vanish?
And, more importantly, will my efforts then go unnoticed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Yes, it will vanish. It will be sentenced to playing with the Birthers in Unicornland, AKA Kenya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
62. Bullshit. Unrec is ALL about opinion and control.
Edited on Tue Aug-04-09 03:33 PM by earth mom
So my opinion is to Unrec this thread!

p.s. That's how Karma works.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. THANKS! My goal is to go for the most unrecs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
63. I thought that feature was to confirm if you'd "Tap that" or not
Wow, I'm sending out some mixed signals there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Shit. I'm doin it wrong. There is nothin I wouldn't "tap"...straight up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
67. I heard that Unrec will take away my medicare
Not that I'm on medicare, but you know what I'm saying. I don't like this OP, but I like Xultar. So I'm going to Rec this thread just to reinforce this as a cult of personality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Unrec will only make a woman's boobs or a man's penis smaller.
That is what I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. I just rec'ed
Are your boobs bigger? :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. ROFFPNMFPLMFAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. So that's a yes?
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-04-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
74. Are you SERIOUSLY trying to say that people don't look at the recommendation column?
Big damned deal that it doesn't program the thread to oblivion, people look at the recommend, total viewings and total posts columns to determine what they want to spend their time with.

Far too many like to tell others what's worth dealing with, and that ABSOLUTELY affects the thread's future.

It also brings out the nasty side of people who feel they're fighting the good fight by quashing any dissent.

Important threads pointing out missteps or other actions by the administration are labled treason by the local Deacons of Decency, and thoughtful discussion is crushed before given a chance to develop.

Some people are more given to following the crowd than others, and this has MUCH more effect than simply elevation to the wing-ding doozey page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #74
75. Most of us don't
Seriously.

Although a few times I'll look for the <0 just to see what it's all about and found some great thread that way.

This is the real world and we have just as much right to agree or disagree with a post. Unrec feature does the job it is suppose to do and yet....and yet....

I searched GD for the top 10 most replied-to threads and TWO of them have <0 threads and THREE of the 10 most replied to threads have <0 unrec in GDP.

and if I expanded that search range to 10 or less recommends - both forums have at least 5 that qualify for 10 or less unrec and well over 100 replies each.

So thing is, most of us don't care. I guess it's life or death for you - whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #74
77. I don't look at the recommend column.
I look at the OP and the first few replies to see if this is something I'd be happy to see on the front page, or if it's just an airing of DU's dirty laundry, and then I unrec or do not unrec accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
76. "....being on the Greatest Page has nothing to do with merit"
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 12:35 AM by omega minimo
The whole UnRec toy has been presented as a moving target of What Has Merit Emough To Be On Greatest and We Who Know These Things and Know What Everyone Like Us In The Majoirty Thinks, Will Know It When We See It.

Including in this OP.

Which, considering how quickly DU moves, the notion of "just means hey only so much room on greatest...so not this one.," rings incredibly hoolow.

Why are the UnRec people the ones continuing to run OPs on UnRec?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
78. You have to admit that it's been fun to watch.
I always have to wonder how trouble free someone's life must be to actually worry about this. My cat having furballs ranks higher on my priority list of things to worry myself over. Especially as he tends to hack them up inside. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug 20th 2014, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC