much discussion has been triggered these days by French President Sarkozy's collapse as he was jogging.
this is from the BBC today:
"The president, on a strict new diet and exercise regime, did not lose consciousness but needed to lie down, said officials, contradicting earlier reports that he had fainted.
It had been reported that he had suffered vasovagal syncope - a nerve condition in which exhaustion and dehydration can lead to a loss of consciousness due to a loss of blood pressure. But it seems he actually suffered a vasovagal episode, which is less intense.
...
"It seems to have been triggered by a combination of the exertion of running, the strict diet he was on and dehydration from the heat", said Andy Dixon, editor of Runner's World magazine.
well i've been running (so harder than jogging) since 20 years now, and i know by experience that the first to
perceive the "hazard" should be the runner himself, according to lifestyle, diet, feeling of one's own body, and on.
a collapse may always happen - but surely mr sarko and his trainers made their best to create the conditions for it.
at least, if we have to mind what mr dixon said.
much ado about nothing, all in all. mr sarko should simply dismiss his personal trainer. and if he's himself his personal trainer, hehe - well get one, mr president.
the bbc article, "Could jogging be bad for you?" is here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8170264.stmciao DUers.