Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lindsey Graham to Conservatives: Enjoy being in the minority

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:30 AM
Original message
Lindsey Graham to Conservatives: Enjoy being in the minority

When Sen. Lindsey Graham announced his support for Sonia Sotomayor this week, right-wing radio talk show host Mark Levin said it was a sign that Graham is “unreliable ... as a thinker and a leader.”


Wendy Long, counsel for the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network, called it proof that Graham “still lacks courage, statesmanship and an understanding of the Constitution and rule of law.”


“May his antics get the attention they richly deserve.”


The response from Graham: Enjoy life in the minority.


In an interview with POLITICO Thursday, the South Carolina Republican defended his decision to back Sotomayor by laying out a broad critique of conservative activists who push “ideological purity” and refuse to cooperate with a Democratic Congress and White House.


“If we chase this attitude … that you have to say ‘no’ to every Democratic proposal, you can’t help the president ever, you can’t ever reach across the aisle, then I don’t want to be part of the movement because it’s a dead-end movement,” Graham said.

.
.
.


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25361.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I still think Graham is a snake in the grass even if he does vote for Sotomayor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Depends what you mean by snake
I think that quite often he says what he thinks and means what he says (I realize I just paid him a huge, and maybe not justified compliment...), I disagree with at least 90% of what he says, but that does not make him a snake IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I think he says and does what is good for Lindsey Graham at the moment.
And he has made a calculation that now is not the time to buck Obama. Watch this space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. As much as I can't stomach Graham, he's right and shows some courage
in saying so, knowing he'll get crucified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I echo your sentiments but will add I would still never turn my back on this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lindsey is
quirky (understatement) and often maddening beyond belief, but he is definitely not among the worst offenders. And, though I am sure many here will disagree, he is pretty smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wonder if he got that statement cleared by his Family cult.
There is nothing this asshole can do to redeem himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree... but it is great seeing in-fighting among the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. ????
Are you sure you are thinking of the right person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I'm pretty sure I do.
This is worth bookmarking:

And just who are known to be members of the Family?

Men under the Family's religio-political counsel include, in addition to Ensign, Coburn and Pickering, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Jim DeMint and Lindsey Graham, both R-S.C.; James Inhofe, R-Okla., John Thune, R-S.D., and recent senators and high officials such as John Ashcroft, Ed Meese, Pete Domenici and Don Nickles. Over in the House there's Joe Pitts, R-Penn., Frank Wolf, R-Va., Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., Ander Crenshaw, R-Fla., Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan., Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., and John R. Carter, R-Texas. Historically, the Family has been strongly Republican, but it includes Democrats, too. There's Mike McIntyre of North Carolina, for instance, a vocal defender of putting the Ten Commandments in public places, and Sen. Mark Pryor, the pro-war Arkansas Democrat responsible for scuttling Obama's labor agenda. Sen. Pryor explained to me the meaning of bipartisanship he'd learned through the Family: "Jesus didn't come to take sides. He came to take over." And by Jesus, the Family means the Family...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=6114258


I was shocked to learn what influence this cult actually has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I did not know, scary stuff n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Graham knows that you have to pick your battles. Sotomayor is a losing battle for the GOP, on many
levels. First, they didn't turn up anything really damaging against her. Second, it's expected that unless a nominee is found to be unfit during the confirmation process, the President should get his way. Third, they look like racist, sexist assholes by refusing to confirm her without good, clear reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Foregone conclusion why waste your ammon on something you will lose anyway n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. In other news today, Lindsey Graham burned at the stake GOP declares "nothing to see here"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. He hit that one square on.
Graham knows where and when to pick his battles, and he knew this was a lost cause from the get-go.

The man isn't stupid. 'Purity' plays well to the base, but IRL it can put you in a box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. There is a place for a "movement" like the GOP...
a place where it can be flushed on down the drain with the other movments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. Progressives to the Dems: Thanks for making the Rethugs electable.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC