Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waning Pacific Clouds Suggest Global Warming Feeds Upon Itself

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:00 PM
Original message
Waning Pacific Clouds Suggest Global Warming Feeds Upon Itself
Waning Pacific Clouds Suggest Global Warming Feeds Upon Itself
By Jeremy van Loon


July 24 (Bloomberg) -- Fewer clouds dot the Pacific skies than a half-century ago, allowing the sun beat to down on the sea and raise temperatures, according to scientists who say the discovery means our planet may heat up more than forecast.

A self-perpetuating cycle, triggered by global warming, has appeared in weather data gathered from 1952 to 2007 over a 3 million-square-kilometer (740,000 square-mile) expanse of ocean off Mexico, Amy Clement of the University of Miami and colleagues wrote in this week’s edition of Science.

Clouds, like forest fires and Arctic permafrost, are studied for their potential to amplify warming. There is still enough mystery in how they function that scientists have said it’s difficult to produce a consensus forecast for temperatures, which in turn may determine the severity of future storms, droughts and Arctic ice melting.

“There’s a wide range of predicted warming for the 21st century,” Clement, a professor of meteorology and oceanography, said in a podcast on the Science Web site. “This study indicates that perhaps we should be giving serious consideration to the high range of future warming.”

Trying to stem climate change, a 17-member group of the Earth’s most polluting nations including the U.S. and China agreed this month to limit the global average temperature increase to no more than 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times. They couldn´t agree on targets for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, leaving that for climate treaty talks that are set to conclude in December. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=a6EvbLkU1w6w




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. hmmm..
“The big problem is trying to understand the roles of clouds in climate change,” Clement said. “CO2 alone would amount to just a modest warming of the earth. The big issue is whether feedback from the climate system amplifies or dampens the warming.”

so they really don't know yet but it doesn't look good AND they are anticipating a 4.5 degree rise in temps within the next century. damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like that will reduce rainfall, also.
Forget oil, coal, gold. Water will be the most precious commodity, in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. water will be reduced in some areas
but will increase in others. Lack of clouds over the Pacific seems to fit with the historic drought going on in Australia.

From what I've read, areas that are already dry are likely to become drier, while ones that are wet will become wetter.

Here in Maine, the last 6 years have seen heavy, heavy rains. And not normal types either -- massive deluges that drop 3" in 24 hours. One after another. Last summer, in July we suddenly got 3 weeks straight of cold, cloudy rain. July normally is the beginning of our "drought" season. A neighbor for the first time in his life couldn't hay some of his fields.

This year, we had about 6 weeks straight of clouds and rain -- all of June into early July. No more than 1 or 2 hours of sun per week. Then we started getting a sunny day or two here and there. Now suddenly we seem to be sliding back into clouds and drizzle, clouds and drizzle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Imagine what could happen if these abnormal rainfall patterns were to combine with
a shutdown of the Gulf Stream due to the thermohaline thing being disrupted........

Sigh.....

We are living in "interesting" times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think it is unfortunate
they ever called climate change global warming. So far we have had about the coldest summer I can remember, how can you convince the average person there is global warming when it seems the opposite. I think if the leadership started out from the beginning calling it neither we would be better off. I think the American people could have been convinced much easier we had to get off foreign oil for the good of the country. I don't really buy the global warming theory myself especially that humans are causing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. So Richard Lindzen was wrong - again
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. there would be a certain irony if the governments
were making clouds to help reflect heat from the sun and in actuality they be INCREASING global warming


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. this quote kills me...
"the U.S. and China agreed this month to limit the global average temperature increase...."

Oh really. We've agreed to limit the average temperature increase to 2 degrees? We really do think we're little gods, don't we?

If we *stopped* all greenhouse gas production today, I've read that the average temperature could continue to rise for something like 40 more years till CO2 and methane work their way out of the system. It's the methane, I seem to remember, that takes longer to break down.

And that's assuming we haven't already passed the tipping point of runaway warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC