Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Institute for Public Accuracy: Congress Copying Massachusetts' Failing Healthcare?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 08:23 AM
Original message
Institute for Public Accuracy: Congress Copying Massachusetts' Failing Healthcare?
News Release
Congress Copying Massachusetts' Failing Healthcare?

July 21, 2009


STEFFIE WOOLHANDLER
Woolhandler is a primary care physician at Cambridge Hospital and associate professor at Harvard Medical School who has studied and written about the Massachusetts healthcare plan.


She said today: "As Washington politicians climb on-board a Massachusetts-style health reform, Massachusetts healthcare sinks.

"Congress seems poised to include an individual mandate in health reform, copying Massachusetts. Here, beating your wife, communicating a terrorist threat and being uninsured all carry $1,000 fines.

"The 2006 Massachusetts reform halved the state's already low uninsurance rate -- mostly by expanding Medicaid and similar programs at great public expense.

"But reform hasn't made care affordable for middle class families, or for the public treasury. A middle income uninsured 56-year-old is now forced to lay out at least $4,800 for a policy with a $2,000 deductible before it pays for any care, and 20 percent co-payments after that. Overpriced, skimpy coverage like this left one in six Massachusetts residents unable to pay their medical bills last year. Among INSURED residents in the state, 18 percent say they skipped care because they couldn't afford it.

"Meanwhile, health costs continue to rise; our state Senate is planning to drop 28,000 people from the insurance rolls, and public hospitals and clinics have suffered draconian cuts as the governor diverts their funding to shore up the reform. The state just cut the budget of Boston Medical Center, the state's largest safety net provider, by $180 million. Cuts to Cambridge Health Alliance, the second largest safety net provider, have forced closure of half of its psychiatric services and six of its community clinics.

"Massachusetts' experience prefigures the ugly reality of the reform plans on the table in Washington. Searching for the $100-$150 billion extra they'd need each year just to cover the uninsured, Congress threatens to tax health benefits for those who are currently insured, effectively increasing the price. And they'd drain Medicare and Medicaid funds from safety net hospitals, anticipating a sharp drop in those unable to pay for care -- a drop that never really materialized in Massachusetts."

Woolhandler testified before the Health Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee on June 24 in Washington.


For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167


http://www.accuracy.org/newsrelease.php?articleId=2040



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wovenpaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not surprised
I figured that when Romney brought it out, it was to boost him for a presidency run.
Thankfully, it didn't work out for him...now we're stuck with the bills.

MA is a small state-imagine the US
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fozzledick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Romney lied to get this passed.
He deliberately understated how many people needed to be covered and how much it would cost to cover them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. thanks for posting this. Terribly sad and scary prospect, unless
we get something better through Congress.

Let's keep our eyes and ears open and see if we really want the reality of what Congress proposes.

Getting conscious is painful sometimes. Well... often, in my experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. One problem is - how do we know what is even being proposed
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 11:41 AM by truedelphi
Waxman handed the House Committee a 2100 page document on Thursday - and then they may have had to vote for it already on Friday. Luckily the vote was delayed until after the weekend.

I say -if they cannot put together a bill in 500 pages or less they should not at all have it happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep 19th 2014, 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC