Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACTION ALERT: Tell the Senate to Defeat Sessions' Amendments to Hate Crimes Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 09:44 AM
Original message
ACTION ALERT: Tell the Senate to Defeat Sessions' Amendments to Hate Crimes Bill
Today the Senate will take up the Defense Department authorization bill again and three amendments threaten to weaken the Matthew Shepard Hate Crime Prevention Act that the Senate voted to add last week.

Call the Senate switchboard right now at 202-224-3121 and tell your Senator to vote NO on the Sessions Amendments to the hate crimes bill. They are unnecessary, unhelpful and should not be adopted.

Background:

* The first Sessions Amendment would allow the death penalty to be applied in hate crimes cases under some circumstances. This Amendment is unnecessary and is a poison pill designed to kill the bill. The Amendment is being offered by and supported by Senators who oppose the Matthew Shepard Act. It’s ironic that the very Senators who have falsely argued that this bill would put clergy in jail because of their beliefs think that those same clergy should be subject to the death penalty.

* The second Sessions Amendment would place an additional burden on the Justice Department to revise its long established guidelines for hate crimes cases. This Amendment is unnecessary. The Department already has well-established, clear and precise guidelines to govern cases involving bias-motivated violence that work well.

* Finally, the third Sessions Amendment would provide additional penalties for crimes involving servicemembers or their families. This Amendment is unnecessary. Existing statutes already provide special penalties on attacks against members of the Armed Services and veterans. In addition, the vague language of the Amendment is problematic. The Amendment provides for additional penalties for injuring the property of a serviceman or immediate family member. The scope of “family member” or what constitutes an “injury” to their property is unclear.

Regardless of how the Senate disposes of these amendments, the Matthew Shepard Act will next head to a conference committee and then final votes in the House and Senate, likely in September. President Obama stands ready to sign it.

http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2009/07/take-action-tell-senate-to-defeat-sessions-amendments-to-hate-crimes/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick
Give 'em a call, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's important
but I really don't think we have to worry too much about this. I do not remember the exact numbers and the names, but there were several republicans that voted for the original amendment + with the numbers of dems that we now have, votes like these are pretty much safe. Or at least I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC