|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
johncoby2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 11:20 AM Original message |
Ed Schultz apologizing for Imus apology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. Imus apologized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 11:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. It's one thing to not watch and it's another to think that the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 11:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. That's rather cowardly, don't you think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solo_in_MD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Why should Imus be chastized when the thug rappers say much the same thing and are lionized? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 02:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I'm not lionizing any thugs who denigrate women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solo_in_MD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 02:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. But are you even considering going after the thugs or just the shock jock? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 04:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Just the shock jock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. ...so then it's okay imus said what he said since we're not going after the "thugs"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Really? A double standard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solo_in_MD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 02:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Yes it is a double standard, but unless there is serious economic damage, nothing will change |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solo_in_MD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Dupe - Deleted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 12:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
2. Ed is such a wingnut apologist. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yes, but he's also highlighting the numerous examples of RW crap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
5. i was just listening and then shut my radio off..enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
8. How could that be an apology.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lies and propaganda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. from one misogynist to another... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-09-07 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
18. Ed is a RWer who plays a role for $$$ on the radio. And badly, I might add. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC