Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Childless man freed after serving time for child support violations"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 04:28 AM
Original message
"Childless man freed after serving time for child support violations"
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 04:30 AM by armyowalgreens
(CNN) -- Frank Hatley spent the past year in jail for being a deadbeat dad. But there's one problem -- Hatley doesn't have any children. And the "deadbeat" label doesn't fit the 50-year-old either, his supporters say.

After a hearing, Hatley was released from the Cook County Jail in south Georgia Wednesday afternoon, with the help of the Southern Center for Human Rights.

Superior Court Judge Dane Perkins ruled that Hatley was indigent and should not be jailed for not being able to make child support payments. Perkins postponed a decision on whether Hatley should have to make any more back payments on child-support for a child who is not his.

In June of last year, a judge ordered Hatley to jail for failing to reimburse the state for public assistance that was paid to support his "son," who, as the court was aware, is not actually his son.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/07/15/georgia.child.support/index.html

--------------


A very interesting case.

I find it rather funny that the judge in this case decided to throw the book at THIS guy while my father owes 30 K in back child support and refurbishes vintage Jaguars while also purchasing new suits.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. How could a "childless" man go to jail for non-support
some thing is wrong with that picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. From reading the link, it sounds like he signed an agreement to make the support
payments. He should have had good legal representation from the beginning to determine if the kid was actually his.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC