How about a Worst Page?

[dorkulon]

I think threads that receive the most unrecs deserve a level of distinction all their own. Maybe it's just me, but I think I could develop a morbid fascination with a "Worst Page." Anyone else?

[arbusto_baboso]

1. I think that's already called the Sports Forum.

[Iggo]

2. Ba-dum, Psh!

:spray:

[madinmaryland]

4. BWAHAHAHAHA!!!

Good one!

:rofl:

[valerief]

10. Pow! Hahahaha!

:rofl:

[Lorax7844]

17. That's actually a great idea

k and r this thread

[Renew Deal]

3. It would be a race to the bottom.

:nuke:

[Fresh_Start]

5. Me I want the highest absolute number

adding recs and unrecs.

I'm don't need to read preaching to the choir posts, I want to read those with the most disagreement within DU.

[dorkulon]

19. This is a good idea too. +1

[corkhead]

6. .

[LuckyTheDog]

7. I just want to know...

... how far "below zero" some of my posts have fallen.

[Catherine Vincent]

8. No.

If a poster's thread ended up on the "Worst Page", they would not want to contribute to DU anymore. I know I wouldn't.

[moggie]

9. I guess you don't get to the Lounge much? n/t

[valerief]

11. I wouldn't see it. I've got all those people on Ignore. nt

[fishwax]

12. I think there should be a "most voted on" page, rather than a worst page

[Posteritatis]

13. I want a Mediocrest Page. (nt)

[DrDan]

14. I suggested it a couple of days ago - shot down

[damntexdem]

15. What we really need is a Mediocre Page.

To qualify, a thread would have to have no recommendations, no replies, and not be looked at by anyone but the poster.

[dorkulon]

18. I think I've had a few of those.

:nopity:

[CreekDog]

16. There should be a place for those of us who cannot get on the Greatest Page

:think: