NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Exxon Mobil said Tuesday it'll launch a new algae-based biofuels program valued at up to $600 million in the oil major's biggest move so far into alternative energy as a hedge against challenges facing the fossil-fuel business.
Exxon Mobil /quotes/comstock/13*!xom/quotes/nls/xom (XOM 65.97, +0.27, +0.41%) formed a research-and-development alliance with La Jolla, Calif.,-based Synthetic Genomics for next-generation biofuels from photosynthetic algae.
The oil major joins a list of big names associated with the research firm founded by J. Craig Venter and Nobel Laureate Hamilton O. Smith including BP plc /quotes/comstock/13*!bp/quotes/nls/bp (BP 46.70, +0.50, +1.08%) , Biotechonomy LLC, Draper Fisher Jurvetson and Plenus, S.A. de C.V.
If milestones are successfully met, Exxon Mobil expects to spend more than $600 million, which includes $300 million in internal costs and potentially more than $300 million to Synthetic Genomics.
"After considerable study, we have determined that the potential advantages and benefits of biofuel from algae could be significant," said Emil Jacobs, vice president of research and development at Exxon Mobil Research and Engineering Company.
While the $600 million for the program amounts to a tiny fraction of Exxon Mobil's record $45 billion profit last year, it outstrips the price tags from others in the fossil-fuel business venturing into biofuels recently.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/exxon-mobil-lays-out-600-million-for-algae-fuelsWeird & maybe a very good thing.
1) I always believed corn based ethanol was a joke and a dead end. Burning food generally is a bad idea.
2) Corn takes a lot of resources to grow. Even sugar cane is 3x as efficient as corn based ethanol.
3) Exxon has always been the most conservative of all the oil companies. They watched the others burn huge amounts of money of unprofitable "green" ventures. For Exxon to jump in and jump in big indicates they saw something that makes them think fuel from algae is both profitable and scalable.