Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Statehood for DC is wrong.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:16 AM
Original message
Statehood for DC is wrong.
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 10:18 AM by imdjh
The reason for it is wrong, perhaps the quest for it is wrong. It isn't about representation, that isn't the most important problem. The problem is that DC is an artificial capital city. The Congress controls the government, the police, the transportation, even the height limit and population density. If DC were a real capital city, an organic one, ie the most populous or most important existing city at the time of the formation of the government, then Congress and the White House wouldn't be able to get away with crap like The Family.

Yes, DC has had ONE major insurrection, but it's not generally thought of as productive, even if I think of it as operative.

I used to oppose statehood for DC but I am rethinking it. I can't help but think that as a state, the government would corrupt it as much as it does now. If it's returned to Maryland, I'm thinking it would actually have more power and independence.

If the capital were in NYC, Congress might rightly fear the population at a minimum making life difficult. As it is, it's hard to get people to shut down something like C Street when half the people work for the government and are afraid of losing their jobs or clearances.

DC needs to be liberated, not simply represented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. You live in Pasadena, in the state of Florida?
No WONDER you're so confused/ing.



:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. WOW!! More artifcial land than Dubai or Hong Kong in Pasadena.........
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 01:51 PM by slampoet
.....But i guess it's Okay for White people to live in Florida's fill in the ocean land done 70 years ago than it is for Black people to live on land from swamps that were drained 210 years ago.

Wow. This guy. Maybe imdjh needs to stop posting more than 28 times a day and look at their own town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It wasn't a reference to artificial land.
I was referring to the city being planned and built to be the capital.

But thanks for your utterly irrelevant take on the topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. So was Lansing, MI.
Only to a real 'Merican would city planning be a BAD thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hate to break it to you but every city is artificial - especially in America.
DC needs statehood - and home rule - precisely because it needs to have the right to fend off Congressional interference - like every other state & city in the country has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
divideandconquer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Can't have a majority black state can we?
More people than Wyoming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. How long do you think that would last?
Remember that DC has only been majority black for a fraction of its existence. Few of the houses in DC were first occupied by black people and white people have been returning in small and large waves in the last 30 years. More people would probably see a reason and an advantage to living in DC, especially an independent DC which would probably return the city to white majority even faster. However, in returning the city to Maryland, it's not quite the target for conquest which might take the form of political conquest rather than racial conquest. Moreover, in returning the city to Maryland, the city would not be as much at the mercy of Congress that even an independent state of DC would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. WOW. You really don't know beans about any trends in urban planning do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Your post makes absolutely no sense. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Closet fr**ps rarely do. This isn't the first time with this person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. And this, my friends, is why we have the unrecommend feature
DC has a population about the same size as Alaska, Delaware, Wyoming and a few other small states. And yet these states are allowed a bigger voice in congress than DC?

WRONG!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It's not my best thought out or expressed position. I'll grant you.
The inspiration was that Congress designed a capital that cannot function properly as much else due to limitations on size and population. As I understand it, part of the inspiration for the idea of a federal city was Congress being locked in when it did something unpopular. Would statehood change that? At the moment, I think it's shortsighted. As a state, DC cannot exceed it's borders, a huge part of its functional population is not a part of the city and would not be a part of the state of DC. DC is surrounded by unincorporated "towns" which connect to it. As a city in Maryland, it could theoretically annex those unincorporated areas which are part of its functional population. It could "grow" without actually growing, but once in control of its own zoning, it could theoretically increase in density as well.

Mostly, I'm just warped out of shape by this whole "Family" thing, and thinking that so many of the people in DC are discouraged from direct action against the government because they are ruled by it and beholden to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The city of DC has no control over their own laws
They had a ban on carry permits for guns, mainly to help suppress the crime in the city. Who overturned that law? Conservatives NOT from DC but elected by the other 50 states. Why should some conservative from Texas make gun laws for DC? Let DC make their own laws - cities have way different needs than urban areas or even the suburbs.

The whole concept of the Revolutionary War was that Americans were pissed at paying taxes to England but having no represenation. How does that different from what we have in Washington DC today. The ONLY reason DC can't get representation is that republicans do NOT want to give more power to the democrats (the district is overwhelmingly liberal). But there was a solution that would give the DC representative voting rights in DC and add another house seat to Utah. Why can't we at least do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. DC's gun law would be challenged even if it were a state.
All infringement laws are going to be challenged sooner or later. The nuts and bolts of the DC case may have been unique to the status of the city, but IMO it didn't have the right to such a law regardless of its status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thing is, it still should be DC that decides and not outsiders living there part-time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Taxation Without Representation
It has a meaning as true for DC today as for our forefathers back then.

Or is it the idea of a majority black state with a population in excess of several of the red states?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarthDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Ridiculous Post

If the district is "returned to Maryland," it would have more power and influence? Dead wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC