Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reps/Senators/President concerned about federal spending--I have a solution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:34 PM
Original message
Reps/Senators/President concerned about federal spending--I have a solution
which will dramatically reduce the deficit:

GET US THE HELL OUT OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN SOONER RATHER THAN LATER.

Coupled with

A 15% OVERALL REDUCTION IN DEFENSE SPENDING (Don't worry we'll still have enough bombs to destroy the world over many times).

Then...

PASS HEALTH REFORM WHICH INCLUDES A GOVERNMENT OPTION BECAUSE THAT WILL (IN THE LONG RUN) SAVE $$ BECAUSE PEOPLE WILL GET PREVENTATIVE CARE.

See, Simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Military industrial complex is too entrenched
Look what happened when they tried to cut funding for the F-22 aircraft which was obsolete and even Gates supported getting rid of. A bunch of congresspeople bitched about it because it would mean that their districts would lose jobs. So when you figure out how to make your proposal happen I will be interested to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Public funding of campaigns would be a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes it would but it would hardly solve the entire problem
A congressperson won't vote to cut off funding for the F-22 when it means they lose X number of jobs in their district even if clearly cutting off funding is in the national interest. That has little to do with campaign contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. True but we have to look at all projects not only domestic programs to reduce deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm not saying it's not a good idea
I'm saying that congress unfortunately work that way. Defense spending is more or less untouchable. Many have tried to cut it and many have failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC