
I like it. |
notadmblnd |
Jul-09-09 12:36 PM |
#1 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-09-09 12:58 PM |
#62 |

Wow. We could use an "unrecommend" for replies, too. |
Zenlitened |
Jul-09-09 01:14 PM |
#86 |

snork. |
sui generis |
Jul-09-09 03:16 PM |
#211 |

And I've often thought that some replies are worthy of a recommendation... |
Rhiannon12866 |
Jul-09-09 11:17 PM |
#351 |

Awesome |
scheming daemons |
Jul-09-09 12:37 PM |
#2 |
 
heh, 300 people so far have unrecommended this thread |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Jul-10-09 01:40 AM |
#367 |

Thank you all! nt |
babylonsister |
Jul-09-09 12:37 PM |
#3 |

self-delete NT |
Eric J in MN |
Jul-09-09 12:37 PM |
#4 |

excellent |
Uzybone |
Jul-09-09 12:37 PM |
#5 |

Interesting... nt |
anonymous171 |
Jul-09-09 12:38 PM |
#6 |

So, the 1000 recs on topics like "FUCK YEAH LETS GET HIGH" |
Horse with no Name |
Jul-09-09 12:38 PM |
#7 |
 
Snerk |
peace frog |
Jul-09-09 12:41 PM |
#17 |
 
Not to mention neutralizing the race to be the "5th Rec" ... |
Myrina |
Jul-09-09 12:51 PM |
#46 |
  
Yeah now it is going to be a yo-yo |
Horse with no Name |
Jul-09-09 12:55 PM |
#55 |
   
Let the unrecommend wars begin! |
Fozzledick |
Jul-09-09 01:04 PM |
#75 |
  
I hope I never never never read that phrase again |
NBachers |
Jul-10-09 02:05 AM |
#368 |
 
Oh man I LOVED that thread ..would have given it a hundred recs. :) nt |
wroberts189 |
Jul-09-09 04:43 PM |
#255 |

We thank you and your staff for listening to us, trying new things |
havocmom |
Jul-09-09 12:38 PM |
#8 |
 
I second this reaction |
Jim Lane |
Jul-09-09 09:26 PM |
#337 |

Cool. |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 12:38 PM |
#9 |

How come this thread doesn't have the "unrecommend" link? ;-) |
scheming daemons |
Jul-09-09 12:39 PM |
#10 |
 
It should appear shortly. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:45 PM |
#30 |

And what if everybody unrecommends THIS thread? |
MindMatter |
Jul-09-09 12:59 PM |
#64 |

DU won't be crowded tomorrow? n/t |
gkhouston |
Jul-09-09 01:01 PM |
#69 |

If you unrecommend an admin thread, you are automatically tombstoned. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 01:03 PM |
#73 |

Can I have double pepperoni? n/t |
Horse with no Name |
Jul-09-09 01:23 PM |
#95 |
 
The Walt Starr Special! |
NoPasaran |
Jul-09-09 02:15 PM |
#155 |

Uh Oh |
Horse with no Name |
Jul-09-09 02:17 PM |
#158 |

Right the fuck now?? |
madinmaryland |
Jul-09-09 04:34 PM |
#253 |

I'm glad you were kidding |
XemaSab |
Jul-09-09 07:12 PM |
#304 |

And people say all the funny has left DU! |
Madrone |
Jul-10-09 01:19 AM |
#364 |

I like it. |
Neecy |
Jul-09-09 12:39 PM |
#11 |

Muchisimas gracias. Rec'd. nt |
raccoon |
Jul-09-09 12:39 PM |
#12 |

Thank you. An excellent idea, as always, from our DU Administrators |
Glorfindel |
Jul-09-09 12:39 PM |
#13 |

Very Cool. Appreciate the expanded voice folks will have here at DU..... |
FrenchieCat |
Jul-09-09 12:40 PM |
#14 |

will there be a "Worst" page? |
Enrique |
Jul-09-09 12:40 PM |
#15 |
 
Currently, no. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:47 PM |
#34 |
  
we could have a "greatest" worst page. that might be fun |
orleans |
Jul-09-09 07:40 PM |
#308 |
  
Rather than a "worst," I'd like to see a "most voted on" |
fishwax |
Jul-10-09 01:24 AM |
#366 |
 
That's not a bad idea. |
reflection |
Jul-10-09 07:57 AM |
#381 |
 
lmoa - you have that as your worst page too? I thought I was alone. nm |
Morning Dew |
Jul-09-09 01:56 PM |
#131 |

We can't unrecommend this page? hmmmm |
BR_Parkway |
Jul-09-09 12:41 PM |
#16 |
 
It should be working shortly. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:46 PM |
#31 |
 
You can now! :) n/t |
Mnemosyne |
Jul-09-09 05:01 PM |
#262 |

Sometimes I wish you guys were running our country |
madokie |
Jul-09-09 12:41 PM |
#18 |

Now I see it! |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jul-09-09 12:41 PM |
#19 |

Will we see the individual tally of recs and unrecs, or just the end total? |
JackRiddler |
Jul-09-09 12:42 PM |
#20 |
 
Currently we do not see the individual tally. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:49 PM |
#41 |

Cool, this'll be an interesting experiment. |
tridim |
Jul-09-09 12:42 PM |
#21 |

Two words: Awe. Some. |
Richardo |
Jul-09-09 12:42 PM |
#22 |

Thanks! |
Scurrilous |
Jul-09-09 12:42 PM |
#23 |

Sweet. Thanks! |
City Lights |
Jul-09-09 12:42 PM |
#24 |

Can we take it into negative numbers? |
Forkboy |
Jul-09-09 12:43 PM |
#25 |
 
Yes and no. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:50 PM |
#45 |
  
Awww. |
Forkboy |
Jul-09-09 12:58 PM |
#63 |
  
So much for the races to be the most negative. That would've been fun. |
Chemisse |
Jul-09-09 01:09 PM |
#81 |
 
how about imaginary numbers? |
BlancheSplanchnik |
Jul-09-09 05:16 PM |
#265 |

My threads would earn a negative Pi. |
Forkboy |
Jul-09-09 07:04 PM |
#299 |

you mean like this? |
BlancheSplanchnik |
Jul-09-09 08:42 PM |
#324 |

Thanks! |
redqueen |
Jul-09-09 12:44 PM |
#26 |

K&U! |
tekisui |
Jul-09-09 12:44 PM |
#27 |

More than anything, I like that our vote is counted immediately |
AwakeAtLast |
Jul-09-09 12:45 PM |
#28 |

Cool it works! Test thread. Sorry about that! |
Horse with no Name |
Jul-09-09 12:45 PM |
#29 |

Are you ever going to bring back the "color coded" critique system? |
Bicoastal |
Jul-09-09 12:46 PM |
#32 |
 
No. (nt) |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:51 PM |
#47 |

sorry about that |
guitar man |
Jul-09-09 12:47 PM |
#33 |

THANK YOU! Maybe there will be less garbage on the front page now. nt |
onehandle |
Jul-09-09 12:47 PM |
#35 |

nice. thanks. |
Tuesday Afternoon |
Jul-09-09 12:47 PM |
#36 |

Noice |
blogslut |
Jul-09-09 12:47 PM |
#37 |
 
Oh, Man - Thanks for stopping the page redirect |
NBachers |
Jul-10-09 02:14 AM |
#369 |

Great feature, Skinner... |
SidDithers |
Jul-09-09 12:48 PM |
#38 |

It's great that by recommending or unrecommending, you don't navigate away from the page! Cool! |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Jul-09-09 12:48 PM |
#39 |

Hey Skinner!!! Well as no one |
Froward69 |
Jul-09-09 12:48 PM |
# |

Wow! Excellent. |
WI_DEM |
Jul-09-09 12:48 PM |
#40 |

I like it, my only concern is that important threads will get knocked |
tekisui |
Jul-09-09 12:50 PM |
#42 |
 
That's not the point. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:53 PM |
#50 |

I agree, and I intend to use it in that constructive way. |
tekisui |
Jul-09-09 12:57 PM |
#60 |

See Reply #62. One Reaganite's, er, person's "junk"... |
Zenlitened |
Jul-09-09 01:19 PM |
#93 |

In other words, the point is to CENSOR! |
Raster |
Jul-09-09 03:10 PM |
#206 |
 
Wouldn't censoring entail removal of content so it is entirely inaccessible? |
Pacifist Patriot |
Jul-09-09 03:30 PM |
#223 |

Yay! I've been a fan of this idea for years! nt |
MADem |
Jul-09-09 03:58 PM |
#239 |

One person's junk is another person's treasure. nt |
rateyes |
Jul-09-09 10:12 PM |
#344 |

Everyone who likes the "Unrecommend" feature rec this thread |
NBachers |
Jul-10-09 02:17 AM |
#370 |

Awesome!! Love it!! |
proud2BlibKansan |
Jul-09-09 12:50 PM |
# |

Hmmm...time to test this with a Michael Jackson thread, |
progressoid |
Jul-09-09 12:50 PM |
#43 |

LOVE it! |
OKNancy |
Jul-09-09 12:50 PM |
#44 |

This may end up in the "be careful what you wish for" bin |
jgraz |
Jul-09-09 12:51 PM |
#48 |
 
I'll eat my hat if "Puppies Are Cute" or "I like pie" end up at the top of the Greatest Page. (nt) |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:54 PM |
#52 |
  
I'd post one, but I know you'll just lock it and declare victory |
jgraz |
Jul-09-09 12:56 PM |
#57 |
  
I've got to see this... |
awoke_in_2003 |
Jul-09-09 01:44 PM |
#120 |
  
looks like you can save your hat |
charlie and algernon |
Jul-09-09 02:22 PM |
#162 |
  
I can finally vote against threads about someone's cat. |
TexasObserver |
Jul-09-09 04:15 PM |
#245 |
  
Speaking of which,,, |
Renew Deal |
Jul-09-09 05:00 PM |
#261 |
 
You might have a point. |
ihavenobias |
Jul-09-09 12:59 PM |
#65 |

Personally, I plan on un-rec'ing every REC THIS thread |
jgraz |
Jul-09-09 01:01 PM |
#70 |
 
I think it's worth it just for the ability to do that |
spoony |
Jul-09-09 03:39 PM |
#226 |
 
Hear, Hear!! |
NBachers |
Jul-10-09 02:20 AM |
#372 |

That is my concern. |
tekisui |
Jul-09-09 01:04 PM |
#74 |

Why is that a concern? |
Uzybone |
Jul-09-09 01:22 PM |
#94 |
 
Yes, people who disagree do have a right to SAY they disagree by SAYING it. |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 02:24 PM |
#165 |

An excellent point |
jgraz |
Jul-09-09 08:44 PM |
#325 |

Well, that is the intention of the feature is it not? |
Dragonfli |
Jul-09-09 09:12 PM |
#329 |

I trust people who post less rather than more. |
pyoom |
Jul-10-09 01:14 AM |
#363 |

I dunno... |
reflection |
Jul-10-09 08:04 AM |
#382 |

That is the point - "DLC loyalty test" feature , DLC folks can spend all day here unrecing criticism |
Dragonfli |
Jul-09-09 08:21 PM |
#318 |

some surprising "unrecommends" in a thread about Andy Stephenson's health care nightmare |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Jul-10-09 12:08 AM |
#356 |

And they get to squash what true Democrats recommend with Their new rec "filibuster" minority power |
Dragonfli |
Jul-10-09 12:37 AM |
#362 |

That changes my ignore list considerably. (nt) |
noamnety |
Jul-09-09 12:53 PM |
#49 |

This is a nice feature, but it seems only half-implemented to me |
Occulus |
Jul-09-09 12:53 PM |
#51 |
 
That's how it's supposed to work. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 12:54 PM |
#53 |

Ah. I missed that part, obviously. n/t |
Occulus |
Jul-09-09 12:57 PM |
#61 |

OK, immediate impression: Greatest Page looks too busy |
jgraz |
Jul-09-09 12:54 PM |
#54 |

WTF?? Why can't we recommend or un-recommend threads in the Sports Forum?? |
madinmaryland |
Jul-09-09 12:55 PM |
#56 |

What will happen: Swarms of trolls will unrecommend threads with valuable info about hot subjects. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jul-09-09 12:57 PM |
#58 |
 
This is exactly what happens on Digg |
jgraz |
Jul-09-09 01:00 PM |
#67 |
  
Those factions at Digg should probably try to get a job and/or |
Lucky Luciano |
Jul-09-09 03:29 PM |
#222 |
  
and since there is NO proprietary anything to prevent gaming the system, |
Raster |
Jul-09-09 08:11 PM |
#314 |
 
Yes, that could happen. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 01:01 PM |
#68 |
  
Are there any new rules pending on batch rec/unrec activity? |
jgraz |
Jul-09-09 01:02 PM |
#71 |
 
I don't think any new rules are necessary. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 01:06 PM |
#78 |
 
I'm with you. There are already hordes of trolls ever at the ready to swarm on certain topics who do |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 01:43 PM |
#118 |
 
My concern also. n/t |
corpseratemedia |
Jul-09-09 02:13 PM |
#150 |

EXCELLENT. |
lamp_shade |
Jul-09-09 12:57 PM |
#59 |

NOW we need an ANTI-Greatest page |
the other one |
Jul-09-09 01:00 PM |
#66 |
 
LOL! |
inna |
Jul-09-09 01:12 PM |
#84 |
  
never mind, i figured that out. doh! :) nt |
inna |
Jul-09-09 01:13 PM |
#85 |
 
here here - and add a place where all the deleted posts show back up at random without context |
tomm2thumbs |
Jul-09-09 01:40 PM |
#115 |

linguistic nit: "unrecommend" sounds more like undoing your own previous recommendation |
unblock |
Jul-09-09 01:02 PM |
#72 |
 
We thought that this was the simplest way to do it. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 01:05 PM |
#76 |

someone charges you by the word? :) |
unblock |
Jul-09-09 01:09 PM |
#80 |

Wicked. |
aquart |
Jul-09-09 01:05 PM |
#77 |

You took away the "confirm (un)rec" dialog! Why? |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 01:09 PM |
#79 |

AWESOME!!! great idea!!! |
inna |
Jul-09-09 01:10 PM |
#82 |

Yay! Thank you! :) K & R AND recommend doesn't go to another screen! |
glitch |
Jul-09-09 01:11 PM |
#83 |

Nice. A couple of suggestions. |
Nye Bevan |
Jul-09-09 01:14 PM |
#87 |
 
Yes, the + signs are unnecessary. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 01:35 PM |
#112 |

does that mean you might consider dropping the "+" after an introductory period |
fishwax |
Jul-10-09 02:36 PM |
#399 |

Very cool, Skinner! |
SeattleGirl |
Jul-09-09 01:15 PM |
#88 |

i don't understand why so many people unrecommended this thread! |
inna |
Jul-09-09 01:17 PM |
#89 |
 
Actually, the number of unrecs isn't very high. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 01:28 PM |
#98 |
 
Weird humor probably to try it out :) I am going to try and see if I can both rec and unrec. Can't. |
glitch |
Jul-09-09 01:33 PM |
# |
 
oh, c'mon. Seriously? You don't understand why? |
TygrBright |
Jul-09-09 01:34 PM |
#110 |

Hahahaha |
Stinky The Clown |
Jul-09-09 01:43 PM |
#119 |

Excuse me, but some of us unrec'd this because we disagree that the unrec feature is a good thing. |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 02:13 PM |
#151 |
 
Then you should RECOMMEND the thread because you want lots of people to read your argument. |
TygrBright |
Jul-09-09 02:25 PM |
#166 |

It's my protest vote against the "unrecommend" feature. This thread is obviously in no danger |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 02:39 PM |
#180 |

I'm sorry I sounded snarky. |
TygrBright |
Jul-09-09 03:14 PM |
#208 |

Thank you for responding. I appreciate the apology. (nt) |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 03:46 PM |
#230 |

"...we have LOTS of psychological primary schoolers amongst us." |
Raffi Ella |
Jul-10-09 10:51 AM |
#389 |

Thank you! This is a great idea can I suggest a couple of others? |
NJmaverick |
Jul-09-09 01:17 PM |
#90 |

I love it! One-click recommending! |
Canuckistanian |
Jul-09-09 01:18 PM |
#91 |

better than a whole case of troll-b-gone. thanks so much. np |
mopinko |
Jul-09-09 01:18 PM |
#92 |
 
(you can get that?) |
libodem |
Jul-09-09 02:14 PM |
#154 |

shhh. it's a secret. |
mopinko |
Jul-09-09 02:40 PM |
#182 |

my mild concern is that in instances like the previous primary |
Lerkfish |
Jul-09-09 01:25 PM |
#96 |
 
I agree that is a concern. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 01:30 PM |
#99 |

ok then, good on ya. |
Lerkfish |
Jul-09-09 01:34 PM |
#111 |

Great idea! |
Kahuna |
Jul-09-09 01:26 PM |
#97 |

Maybe taking the 911 threads |
Pharaoh |
Jul-09-09 01:31 PM |
#100 |
 
Perhaps allowing 9/11 threads to acheive Greatest status with this new function? |
robertpaulsen |
Jul-09-09 08:27 PM |
#320 |
 
Sometimes someone posts a brillant comment within a thread can we rec it? |
Bushknew |
Jul-09-09 09:15 PM |
#331 |

Sort of like a blanket party... |
niceypoo |
Jul-09-09 01:31 PM |
#101 |

Very well thought out implementation |
Papa Boule |
Jul-09-09 01:31 PM |
#102 |

Thank you, SKinner, Elad, and EarlG. |
Cha |
Jul-09-09 01:31 PM |
#103 |

Note: If you're not going to show negative rec numbers, then there's no need for the '+' sign.... |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 01:32 PM |
#104 |

Excellent ... |
RoyGBiv |
Jul-09-09 01:32 PM |
#105 |

Well good luck with it |
ismnotwasm |
Jul-09-09 01:33 PM |
#106 |

Okay, I'm late to the party, but it seems like when the Freeper lurkers |
Cleita |
Jul-09-09 01:33 PM |
#107 |

Hey Skinner .... you are to be commended for always keeping an open mind and being willing to undo |
Stinky The Clown |
Jul-09-09 01:33 PM |
#108 |
 
Good Point(s) n/t |
OhioChick |
Jul-09-09 01:57 PM |
#133 |
 
Oh my |
Horse with no Name |
Jul-09-09 02:05 PM |
#139 |

Idea: color code the value. |
BadgerKid |
Jul-09-09 01:33 PM |
#109 |

Didn't we try this once and it sucked? |
shadowknows69 |
Jul-09-09 01:38 PM |
#113 |
 
No, we tried something else that sucked. I don't remember what it was, but |
gkhouston |
Jul-10-09 02:46 PM |
#401 |

Popcorn please? I can already predict the half dozen ways that this will cause problems. |
McCamy Taylor |
Jul-09-09 01:39 PM |
#114 |
 
THANK YOU! The debate should end there. |
rudy23 |
Jul-09-09 02:49 PM |
#191 |
 
PAID POSTERS? Where do I sign up? I NEED A JOB!! n/t |
greguganus |
Jul-09-09 03:26 PM |
#219 |
  
They exist. I cannot prove it but I have lurked this board since it began. nt |
wroberts189 |
Jul-09-09 04:30 PM |
#251 |
 
Yup, some posters hardly ever venture out of the dungeon. Clearly paid. |
Bushknew |
Jul-09-09 09:22 PM |
#333 |

more people have unrecommended this thread than recommend |
snooper2 |
Jul-09-09 01:41 PM |
#116 |
 
I did... it's a terrible idea. Mob mentality will rule DU. |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Jul-09-09 01:55 PM |
#128 |
  
I "unrec'd" this thread, too. I think this is a very very bad idea. |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 02:07 PM |
#142 |
 
Actually that's not quite right |
EarlG |
Jul-09-09 02:01 PM |
#136 |
 
I did too. It's a lame idea. |
Political Heretic |
Jul-09-09 08:35 PM |
#323 |

I love it! |
pleah |
Jul-09-09 01:42 PM |
#117 |

Good times with unrecommending, lol |
That Is Quite Enough |
Jul-09-09 01:44 PM |
#121 |

I hope this new feature dies and soon. |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 01:51 PM |
#122 |
 
I agree with scarlet woman. I think this is a bad idea. |
Beam Me Up |
Jul-09-09 02:09 PM |
#145 |
  
Bullseye. nt |
rudy23 |
Jul-09-09 10:17 PM |
#345 |
 
Excellent, excellent point. |
Karmadillo |
Jul-09-09 02:12 PM |
#147 |
 
I also agree with scarletwoman |
Andy823 |
Jul-09-09 10:19 PM |
#346 |
 
I agree with you completely. |
PassingFair |
Jul-11-09 03:47 PM |
#412 |

This will accomplish exactly one thing: |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 01:52 PM |
#123 |
 
That's ALL this is about. How unfortunate. CENSORSHIP. |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Jul-09-09 01:53 PM |
#125 |
 
Awww... the whiners are no longer free from criticism. How sad.... |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 01:55 PM |
#129 |
  
Wow. You're a really dishonest person. |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 01:56 PM |
#132 |
 
I think you need a new dictionary. Look up the word censorship. |
scheming daemons |
Jul-09-09 02:15 PM |
#157 |
  
Tell me, scheming daemons, why don't you look it up yourself? |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 02:19 PM |
#159 |
 
Here ya go... |
scheming daemons |
Jul-09-09 02:28 PM |
#169 |
 
Look how far you've come already. |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 02:36 PM |
#177 |
 
It doesn't prevent it from being seen. Not in the least. |
scheming daemons |
Jul-09-09 02:48 PM |
#188 |
 
Hmm.. You seem to be running now. |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 03:00 PM |
#199 |
  
Not running from anything.... You called it censorship... it clearly is not.... |
scheming daemons |
Jul-09-09 03:08 PM |
#203 |
 
So, just because the minority won't be heard because of censors, |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 03:10 PM |
#207 |
 
The trouble is that a lot of threads are generated by the minute, and it takes no time at all for |
IntravenousDemilo |
Jul-09-09 07:46 PM |
#310 |
 
that's pretty much it. |
FLAprogressive |
Jul-09-09 02:48 PM |
#189 |
 
Whether something appears on the Greatest Page or not has no bearing on.. |
Pacifist Patriot |
Jul-09-09 03:35 PM |
#225 |

Well then, I guess I can just print it out and stick it in my pocket instead. |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 03:40 PM |
#227 |

Definitely an option. I print posts all the time. Which reminds me, I have one I printed... |
Pacifist Patriot |
Jul-10-09 09:22 AM |
#386 |

We should be able to see the negative number. That way we see how delusional certain groups |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Jul-09-09 01:53 PM |
#124 |
 
You can simply subtract the positive rating from the total. |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 01:55 PM |
#127 |

Thanks :-) I just realized that. I still don't like it... but whatever, I'll still be here. |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Jul-09-09 01:58 PM |
#135 |

That's not quite how it works |
EarlG |
Jul-09-09 02:02 PM |
#137 |

Thanks. |
BuyingThyme |
Jul-09-09 02:15 PM |
#156 |

Note: There's little point in not showing the precise negative number... |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 01:54 PM |
#126 |
 
Note: I make mistakes. Thanks for pointing it out in your usual manner. |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Jul-09-09 02:02 PM |
#138 |
 
Your equations are correct, but they don't prove your point. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 02:06 PM |
#140 |
  
Note that I said "the bulk of", not "all of". And similarly, I said "little point"... |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 02:08 PM |
#143 |
  
The second equation is incorrect (or typo?). Using EarlG's terminology/example in #136 for clarity: |
tiptoe |
Jul-09-09 08:05 PM |
#312 |
 
On second thought.. the number SHOULD be shown because most people won't bother. |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Jul-09-09 02:09 PM |
#144 |
  
Doesn't matter much to me either way. I can see reasons pro and con on it... |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 02:12 PM |
#148 |
 
True. Isn't mine either. |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Jul-09-09 02:14 PM |
#153 |
 
:) It's the right thing to do. |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 02:35 PM |
#176 |
 
in other words, there *is* a point, & it would be more transparent, to post the two totals. |
Hannah Bell |
Jul-09-09 02:50 PM |
#193 |

They resolved the issue by taking away more information - hahahahha!! |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 02:53 PM |
#195 |

I LIKE it! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Jul-09-09 01:56 PM |
#130 |

Thank you for the trial, but I'll understand if it doesn't work out. |
DCKit |
Jul-09-09 01:58 PM |
#134 |

So, at this time your post has +52 recommends of 138 votes??? |
tandot |
Jul-09-09 02:06 PM |
#141 |
 
Aparently 2 to 1 AGAINST this feature: Recommendation: +56 (152 votes) n/t |
Beam Me Up |
Jul-09-09 02:22 PM |
#163 |

No, it's a net +56 out of 152 votes. |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-09-09 02:29 PM |
#170 |

That's not how it works |
EarlG |
Jul-09-09 02:31 PM |
#171 |
 
Ok. Thanks for the clarification. n/t |
Beam Me Up |
Jul-09-09 02:32 PM |
#172 |
 
Re: "I think we're going to...remove the total number of votes so it just shows the net score." |
Zenlitened |
Jul-09-09 03:04 PM |
#201 |
 
I think that's too bad. The most interesting part of the whole thing is the internal dynamics |
Phoebe Loosinhouse |
Jul-09-09 03:46 PM |
#229 |

Re: "Go ahead and let it all hang out."... I agree. |
Zenlitened |
Jul-09-09 07:09 PM |
#302 |

I assume that half of those just simply thought it was funny to unrecommend a Skinner post |
tandot |
Jul-09-09 02:59 PM |
#197 |

Sweet! Love how you stay on the page now too. |
Matariki |
Jul-09-09 02:11 PM |
#146 |
 
Yes, staying on the same page part, that I like. |
Beam Me Up |
Jul-09-09 02:23 PM |
#164 |

My suggestion... if you keep this feature, show the actual negative number instead of " |
jesus_of_suburbia |
Jul-09-09 02:13 PM |
#149 |

Do we really want important, controversial posts to suffer & bland, noncontroversial posts to bene- |
Faryn Balyncd |
Jul-09-09 02:14 PM |
#152 |

I wish this feature was not added. |
merh |
Jul-09-09 02:21 PM |
#160 |

Bravo! n/t |
reflection |
Jul-09-09 02:21 PM |
#161 |

UPDATE: We are going to make a change. |
Skinner |
Jul-09-09 02:27 PM |
#167 |
 
lol - Because giving people *less* information is the way to clear up confusion. |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 03:05 PM |
# |
 
I should've read the entire thread before responding to EarlG, above |
Zenlitened |
Jul-09-09 03:15 PM |
#210 |
  
I agree. |
redqueen |
Jul-09-09 05:33 PM |
#270 |
 
I don't know if there is a better way to present it |
izzybeans |
Jul-09-09 03:56 PM |
#234 |
 
Clearly, I Joined DU 2 Days Too Late |
Sophie-Helene |
Jul-11-09 12:18 AM |
#409 |

I like the rec/unrec total. People are tryin' it out! nt |
Occam Bandage |
Jul-09-09 02:28 PM |
#168 |

Cool |
PatSeg |
Jul-09-09 02:33 PM |
#173 |

Woot. |
berni_mccoy |
Jul-09-09 02:33 PM |
#174 |

(snarfle) "confusion". |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 02:34 PM |
#175 |

As much as I think this might be useful... |
kenfrequed |
Jul-09-09 02:36 PM |
#178 |
 
We will be keeping an eye on how the system is being used |
EarlG |
Jul-09-09 02:42 PM |
#185 |
  
Here is an example of what I'm afraid of (as posted above): |
Beam Me Up |
Jul-09-09 02:45 PM |
#187 |
 
I just rec'd it and saw that it had 17 votes altogether. That means 8 people showed up to take |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 02:59 PM |
#198 |
 
Of course it's going to suck. The whole point is to allow community censorship, completely |
Raster |
Jul-09-09 03:24 PM |
#218 |
 
How does this negate discussion? You are free to continue discussing on GD and GD:P |
HamdenRice |
Jul-09-09 03:50 PM |
#233 |
 
It's the discussion at any forum other than GREATEST that is the issue. |
Raster |
Jul-09-09 03:56 PM |
#235 |
 
It lessens discussion. Important topics can be kept off the greatest |
tekisui |
Jul-09-09 05:23 PM |
#266 |
 
Exactly. And there are plenty of trolls and closet subversives ready to stymie discussion. |
Raster |
Jul-09-09 03:57 PM |
#238 |

I love it!! In fact in honorarium I have an 'unrecommend thread' in the lounge |
bridgit |
Jul-09-09 02:38 PM |
#179 |

If a post gets 5 or more votes, gets on Greatest Page then gets net negative votes does it come off? |
HamdenRice |
Jul-09-09 02:40 PM |
#181 |

Dupe delete |
HamdenRice |
Jul-09-09 02:40 PM |
#183 |

what an interesting idea |
mimitabby |
Jul-09-09 02:42 PM |
#184 |

Delete. Found sub-thread for my question... n/t |
Subdivisions |
Jul-09-09 02:44 PM |
#186 |

K&R! |
yellerpup |
Jul-09-09 02:48 PM |
#190 |

Yep....Loves It! |
Bobbie Jo |
Jul-09-09 02:50 PM |
#192 |

Works good, ugh |
DainBramaged |
Jul-09-09 02:50 PM |
#194 |

A suggestion-- |
Jackpine Radical |
Jul-09-09 02:57 PM |
#196 |
 
It's an interesting idea, I could live with that. In fact, I think it's the ONLY way this is going |
scarletwoman |
Jul-09-09 03:20 PM |
#213 |

The problem I see... |
thesquanderer |
Jul-09-09 03:00 PM |
#200 |

Bad. Fucking. Idea! |
Raster |
Jul-09-09 03:05 PM |
#202 |

just a thought - |
tomm2thumbs |
Jul-09-09 03:09 PM |
#204 |

I like this new system. |
SIMPLYB1980 |
Jul-09-09 03:10 PM |
#205 |

Just staying on the same page after recommending was worth the price of admission! |
satya |
Jul-09-09 03:14 PM |
#209 |

Maybe a tweak is in order. |
Tommy_Carcetti |
Jul-09-09 03:17 PM |
#212 |
 
that's a good idea as well - 'less than zero' is pretty disheartening when zero would suffice |
tomm2thumbs |
Jul-09-09 03:23 PM |
#216 |

can you have negative net votes? Oooooh. The Worst of DU page. |
sui generis |
Jul-09-09 03:21 PM |
#214 |

Excellent |
grantcart |
Jul-09-09 03:22 PM |
#215 |

Skinner, I noticed you've changed it so now one can't tell how many unrecommends a post has |
Lone_Star_Dem |
Jul-09-09 03:24 PM |
#217 |

You must know that people are going to game this. I think it's a bad idea. nt |
earth mom |
Jul-09-09 03:26 PM |
#220 |
 
No more than gaming the "k and R" |
izzybeans |
Jul-09-09 03:57 PM |
#236 |

It did not work. It stayed the same after I unrecommend this thread |
TWiley |
Jul-09-09 03:28 PM |
#221 |
 
Maybe somebody rec'd it at the same time and cancelled you out? |
progressoid |
Jul-09-09 03:31 PM |
#224 |

Why have the plus sign if not displaying the negatives? |
harun |
Jul-09-09 03:45 PM |
#228 |

Great feature. Hopefully one day we will also see just how low an OP's rating is |
ecstatic |
Jul-09-09 03:49 PM |
#231 |

Oh, they will love this in the GDP |
incapsulated |
Jul-09-09 03:49 PM |
#232 |
 
the all-star (assholes) are already disparaging anyone who doesn't like it. |
FLAprogressive |
Jul-09-09 03:57 PM |
#237 |

And I guess the non-star (assholes) are already disparaging anyone who does like it? |
Raster |
Jul-09-09 03:59 PM |
#241 |

I'm already seeing threads with less than zero that shouldn't bother anyone |
incapsulated |
Jul-09-09 03:59 PM |
#240 |
 
Here is another |
incapsulated |
Jul-09-09 04:10 PM |
#242 |
  
Acutally some freeper is going around unrec'ing anything to do with Ensign, lol |
incapsulated |
Jul-09-09 04:20 PM |
#246 |
 
I rec'd and unrec'd about 6-8 threads yesterday when I encountered |
gkhouston |
Jul-10-09 02:43 PM |
#400 |

How do you unrecommend something? |
JonLP24 |
Jul-09-09 04:12 PM |
#243 |
 
an actual unrecommend function would be more handy IMO |
foo_bar |
Jul-10-09 07:08 AM |
#380 |

I think this is a really bad idea. |
Liberty Belle |
Jul-09-09 04:13 PM |
#244 |

I hate this. |
noamnety |
Jul-09-09 04:25 PM |
#247 |

I got a couple of more ideas... |
wroberts189 |
Jul-09-09 04:26 PM |
#248 |
 
One more ..you can only unrec after 1000 posts. nt |
wroberts189 |
Jul-09-09 04:27 PM |
#249 |

Double Plus Ungood |
omega minimo |
Jul-09-09 04:28 PM |
#250 |

Good feature: May I suggest limiting the number of Unrecommends? |
backscatter712 |
Jul-09-09 04:33 PM |
#252 |

Like the admin said ..lets try it and see how it goes... |
wroberts189 |
Jul-09-09 04:36 PM |
#254 |

Heaven forbid we continue to have controversial topics at the top of the Greatest page |
MadHound |
Jul-09-09 04:49 PM |
#256 |

Thank you Skinner |
Autumn |
Jul-09-09 04:49 PM |
#257 |

What next, an option to recommend banning? |
Deja Q |
Jul-09-09 04:52 PM |
#258 |

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU! |
PretzelWarrior |
Jul-09-09 04:55 PM |
#259 |

A suggested tweak that might help balance things: |
missingthebigdog |
Jul-09-09 04:57 PM |
#260 |

We're trying this again? |
Renew Deal |
Jul-09-09 05:01 PM |
# |

. |
Renew Deal |
Jul-09-09 05:01 PM |
#263 |

Fabulous and fair functionality. |
pecwae |
Jul-09-09 05:10 PM |
#264 |

Why are there new OPs which are just responses to this? |
redqueen |
Jul-09-09 05:28 PM |
#267 |

Register another positive response. |
WheelWalker |
Jul-09-09 05:32 PM |
#268 |

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!! Best. Feature. Ever. nt |
live love laugh |
Jul-09-09 05:32 PM |
#269 |

You know what would be good (IMO)... |
redqueen |
Jul-09-09 05:40 PM |
#271 |
 
That would be fun! |
LanternWaste |
Jul-09-09 05:41 PM |
#272 |

This is a feature that doesn't enhance dialog but seems more like a weapon |
eleny |
Jul-09-09 05:44 PM |
#273 |

K & |
katsy |
Jul-09-09 05:46 PM |
#274 |

Let this one play out longer this time. |
HiFructosePronSyrup |
Jul-09-09 05:46 PM |
#275 |

I think this will be a disaster when you have a contested primary |
dsc |
Jul-09-09 05:48 PM |
#276 |

Thank you Skinner, this will keep the stupid flamewar threads of the Greatest Page. |
Odin2005 |
Jul-09-09 05:51 PM |
#277 |
 
Taking care of stupid flamewar threads is a mod's responsibility. Mods monitor and moderate. |
IntravenousDemilo |
Jul-09-09 08:20 PM |
#317 |

I'm afraid this may be too democratic! Yes! |
Gregorian |
Jul-09-09 05:57 PM |
#278 |

This can only further divide the community. |
Jakes Progress |
Jul-09-09 06:00 PM |
#279 |
 
+1 |
jeff30997 |
Jul-09-09 06:07 PM |
#284 |

It's too much like "Freeping a Poll" ... not sure I like it (n/t) |
ProudDad |
Jul-09-09 06:00 PM |
#280 |

Skinner - why not allow people to opt out of the feature |
LynneSin |
Jul-09-09 06:03 PM |
#281 |

Have you considered limiting the number of times someone can rec/unrec threads per day? |
satya |
Jul-09-09 06:03 PM |
#282 |

unrec'd. |
masuki bance |
Jul-09-09 06:06 PM |
#283 |

Very nice |
Adelante |
Jul-09-09 06:09 PM |
#285 |

I love the current Greatest Page |
Tuvok Obama |
Jul-09-09 06:15 PM |
#286 |

The logic behind the new feature is sound. |
Laelth |
Jul-09-09 06:32 PM |
#287 |

May I be the first to unrecommended this/ n/t |
peace13 |
Jul-09-09 06:32 PM |
#288 |
 
Too late. I already did. n/t |
Laelth |
Jul-09-09 06:33 PM |
#289 |

This is great! |
SharonRB |
Jul-09-09 06:34 PM |
#290 |

Well Done |
SpartanDem |
Jul-09-09 06:41 PM |
#291 |

Oops. Um, it works. |
billyoc |
Jul-09-09 06:47 PM |
#292 |

Alright!!!! |
HughMoran |
Jul-09-09 06:49 PM |
#293 |

this makes sense, and it is apparent you put alot of thought into it |
adamuu |
Jul-09-09 06:51 PM |
#294 |

And so, the Rec This Thread If... posts are finished |
Gman |
Jul-09-09 06:52 PM |
#295 |

My problem with this is that I think it will have the effect of eliminating some very useful posts |
rpannier |
Jul-09-09 06:57 PM |
#296 |

Terrific idea |
MissDeeds |
Jul-09-09 07:02 PM |
#297 |

Whew! |
nevergiveup |
Jul-09-09 07:03 PM |
#298 |

I just clicked "rec' for this thread and it didn't add me in the total. |
ColbertWatcher |
Jul-09-09 07:05 PM |
#300 |
 
Concurrency. Someone could have unrec'd around the same time. |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-09-09 07:06 PM |
#301 |

Ah. Good point. n/t |
ColbertWatcher |
Jul-09-09 08:09 PM |
#313 |

Sucks. |
TacticalPeek |
Jul-09-09 07:12 PM |
#303 |

doesn't seem to make sense. |
tomp |
Jul-09-09 07:13 PM |
#305 |

Just testing |
blaze |
Jul-09-09 07:34 PM |
#306 |

Give it a try. If it doesn't fly real well |
azul |
Jul-09-09 07:39 PM |
#307 |

May I cast my vote against this? Also against the new tweak of not showing vote totals... |
JackRiddler |
Jul-09-09 07:43 PM |
#309 |

Best of luck with the new function, Mr. Skinner. If anyone can make such a thing work... |
Richard Steele |
Jul-09-09 07:52 PM |
#311 |

Hmmm.... dare I "unrecommend" this thread? |
WillYourVoteBCounted |
Jul-09-09 08:13 PM |
#315 |

I'm totally NOT a complainer.....but this new feature blows. I hate it. |
marmar |
Jul-09-09 08:20 PM |
#316 |

was it necessary to require enabled javascript for this? |
iverglas |
Jul-09-09 08:25 PM |
#319 |

I think you guys have jumped the shark with this one. |
Raffi Ella |
Jul-09-09 08:32 PM |
#321 |
 
try the gun dungeon ;) |
iverglas |
Jul-09-09 09:35 PM |
#339 |

I think you'll be surprised at what things still make the greatest page |
Political Heretic |
Jul-09-09 08:33 PM |
#322 |

do not want |
musette_sf |
Jul-09-09 08:45 PM |
#326 |

No confirmation? |
travelingtypist |
Jul-09-09 08:51 PM |
#327 |

Now, if we could only get single click poll voting |
HughMoran |
Jul-09-09 08:54 PM |
#328 |

i did it! -- i just had to -- you had over 80 -- |
xchrom |
Jul-09-09 09:13 PM |
#330 |

So, instead of "K&R!" will it be "F&U!" ???? |
beac |
Jul-09-09 09:18 PM |
#332 |

Thank you for your work and I love DU but: K&U, don't like it. |
usregimechange |
Jul-09-09 09:22 PM |
#334 |

Great idea! |
RavensChick |
Jul-09-09 09:23 PM |
#335 |

Love it, thanks! |
Nailzberg |
Jul-09-09 09:25 PM |
#336 |

DU will get gamed and it will be very hard to catch |
Liberation Angel |
Jul-09-09 09:26 PM |
#338 |
 
It just seems so... lazy. |
Mojambo |
Jul-09-09 10:33 PM |
#348 |
 
AGREED! Please read this post and drop the new system!!! nt |
grahamhgreen |
Jul-10-09 12:26 AM |
#358 |

Thinking about this.. if we had only adults (emotionally) this could be a great feature |
Peacetrain |
Jul-09-09 09:43 PM |
#340 |
 
Good point |
usregimechange |
Jul-09-09 09:43 PM |
#341 |

I like that it stays on the same page |
Tindalos |
Jul-09-09 09:47 PM |
#342 |

Why weren't the ignore and hide threads features |
chill_wind |
Jul-09-09 09:56 PM |
#343 |

Better late than never |
Tarc |
Jul-09-09 10:25 PM |
#347 |

It sucks.... |
Hepburn |
Jul-09-09 10:44 PM |
#349 |

Had to unreccomend this |
Alcibiades |
Jul-09-09 10:59 PM |
#350 |

love it |
donheld |
Jul-09-09 11:18 PM |
#352 |

Cool. Now, I want to know who can't handle, uh . . . has me on Ignore. nt |
patrice |
Jul-09-09 11:26 PM |
#353 |
 
lol, me too. |
Renew Deal |
Jul-09-09 11:40 PM |
#355 |

Will be interesting to see how it works out. |
applegrove |
Jul-09-09 11:31 PM |
#354 |

Now that we have this there's hope that FB will add an "Unlike" button |
MessiahRp |
Jul-10-09 12:18 AM |
#357 |

Who the heck wanted this? Did you run polls? Is it to get rid of a certain segment? nt |
grahamhgreen |
Jul-10-09 12:28 AM |
#359 |

I dislike the Unrecommend. please take it off. |
annm4peace |
Jul-10-09 12:29 AM |
#360 |

Why not post the total number & post the super hot threads with the highest total up & down?nt |
grahamhgreen |
Jul-10-09 12:31 AM |
#361 |

Thank you |
DesertRat |
Jul-10-09 01:20 AM |
#365 |

The Result: It accurately identifies threads truly Recommended by posters. |
TexasObserver |
Jul-10-09 02:19 AM |
#371 |

How is this not polarizing? |
omega minimo |
Jul-10-09 02:24 AM |
#373 |

it's a horrible, disastrous idea, especially in its edited form - which just shows the net total. |
inna |
Jul-10-09 02:30 AM |
#374 |

i just unrec'd btw, after my initial (not thought through) enthusiasm... |
inna |
Jul-10-09 02:35 AM |
#375 |

Power to the people |
notesdev |
Jul-10-09 03:00 AM |
#376 |

K&U A very democratic idea -- mob "democracy," that is. |
puebloknot |
Jul-10-09 04:55 AM |
#377 |

Thanks |
mogster |
Jul-10-09 05:16 AM |
#378 |

How about a "Neutral" button. Then we can have a "Whatever" page. |
Norrin Radd |
Jul-10-09 05:31 AM |
#379 |

Good idea Skinner Thanks!! |
bdamomma |
Jul-10-09 08:23 AM |
#383 |

REC WARS!!!! FUCK YEAH!!!!1! |
Orsino |
Jul-10-09 08:49 AM |
#384 |

With cliques, who needs fairness? |
realFedUp |
Jul-10-09 09:05 AM |
#385 |

Good idea. I would change one thing. |
Strong Atheist |
Jul-10-09 10:27 AM |
#387 |

L like it Skinner nt |
goclark |
Jul-10-09 10:35 AM |
#388 |

Can't get on the band wagon with this one... |
PerpetuallyDazed |
Jul-10-09 10:58 AM |
#390 |

Thanks Skinner, and all. Change we can believe in! Thanks for all your hard work. |
FailureToCommunicate |
Jul-10-09 11:06 AM |
#391 |

Bug Report |
WeDidIt |
Jul-10-09 11:32 AM |
#392 |

I have doubts it is a net gain |
LiberalLovinLug |
Jul-10-09 11:43 AM |
#393 |

yay! |
sojourner |
Jul-10-09 11:54 AM |
#394 |

At some point I'd like to know who holds the record for unrecs. LOL. nt |
live love laugh |
Jul-10-09 11:55 AM |
#395 |
 
It looks like it's this thread. +96 of 424 |
Renew Deal |
Jul-10-09 12:02 PM |
#396 |

I don't like it. Too many trolls here. Perhaps going back to limiting number or recs per day or |
OregonBlue |
Jul-10-09 12:04 PM |
#397 |

SUGGESTION: Enable sorting by 'Views'... |
Greyskye |
Jul-10-09 02:06 PM |
#398 |

The count should only go to zero. |
Junkdrawer |
Jul-10-09 03:26 PM |
#402 |
 
That stifles the voice of those who want to unrecommend. Their unrecommend should count against any |
lindisfarne |
Jul-10-09 03:28 PM |
#403 |
  
Can I vote against Palin today - just in case she even thinks about running.... |
Junkdrawer |
Jul-10-09 03:31 PM |
#405 |
   
Not the same thing. An Unrec is a vote somehow against an aspect of the OP; a rec is a vote for |
lindisfarne |
Jul-10-09 03:35 PM |
#406 |
  
Then the URs |
Control-Z |
Jul-11-09 12:38 AM |
#410 |
 
I agree with this |
mvd |
Jul-10-09 03:29 PM |
#404 |

What is the policy behind keeping certain highly recommended threads off the Greatest page list? |
ConsAreLiars |
Jul-10-09 03:47 PM |
#407 |

k & r n/t |
Scout |
Jul-10-09 09:57 PM |
#408 |

I think you could take out the.. |
Haole Girl |
Jul-11-09 02:49 PM |
#411 |

How about making it multiple choice. This is just like candidate elections! |
Better Believe It |
Jul-11-09 04:58 PM |
#413 |

Skinner, I'm sure you are debating your decision... |
kentuck |
Jul-11-09 05:06 PM |
#414 |
 
Good assessment of how Unrecommend adds badly needed balance. |
TexasObserver |
Jul-13-09 05:49 AM |
#429 |

Suggestion - Display both Unrec and Rec numbers |
althecat |
Jul-11-09 06:02 PM |
#415 |
 
Agree, fully. Provision of totals for both Recs & Unrecs at least affords a weight to the NetScores. |
tiptoe |
Jul-12-09 04:51 AM |
#416 |
  
+1 |
inna |
Jul-12-09 11:37 PM |
#420 |
  
+2 |
althecat |
Jul-13-09 01:21 AM |
#424 |
 
Blackbox Unrecommendations... n/t |
Junkdrawer |
Jul-12-09 08:45 AM |
#417 |
 
Much more transparent? |
Haole Girl |
Jul-12-09 11:17 AM |
#418 |
  
What would you do with that info if you had it? (nt) |
noamnety |
Jul-12-09 10:06 PM |
#419 |
 
I think giving the actual numbers would give a more accurate assessment. |
TexasObserver |
Jul-13-09 05:47 AM |
#428 |

Skinner ??? |
WillyT |
Jul-12-09 11:44 PM |
#421 |

It's really no big deal to me but... |
kentuck |
Jul-13-09 12:03 AM |
#422 |

Good see that you are now catering to the DUers that cannot do arithmetic. |
Usrename |
Jul-13-09 12:09 AM |
#423 |

Is this a trial run and if so, how long until you decide whether to keep it? |
FlyingSquirrel |
Jul-13-09 03:47 AM |
#425 |

Unrecommend is a success, broadly supported by DUers. |
TexasObserver |
Jul-13-09 04:07 AM |
#426 |
 
Sig Heil. |
FlyingSquirrel |
Jul-13-09 05:07 AM |
#427 |

I didn't realize THAT was your party. |
TexasObserver |
Jul-13-09 04:09 PM |
#431 |

You also like to pile unsupported assertion on assertion |
EFerrari |
Jul-13-09 08:55 PM |
#435 |

Still stalking me, eh? |
TexasObserver |
Jul-13-09 09:05 PM |
#438 |

LOL |
EFerrari |
Jul-13-09 09:10 PM |
#439 |

This system has the same drawback as the original, |
FlyingSquirrel |
Jul-13-09 06:29 AM |
#430 |
 
OK. "Thumbs up":"Thumbs down" with unassailable-"Recommends": Sort by "Recs" and %-"ThumbsUp" |
tiptoe |
Jul-13-09 06:20 PM |
#432 |
 
Worse than that. At least W's press conferences were civil. |
EFerrari |
Jul-13-09 06:56 PM |
#434 |

I vote to keep this. After a few days it's value is obvious |
PretzelWarrior |
Jul-13-09 06:52 PM |
#433 |
 
Except that isn't what is happening. The people you are talking about |
EFerrari |
Jul-13-09 09:01 PM |
#437 |

Nice of you to take a sly shot at the poster "I know it's hard for you to understand..." |
HughMoran |
Jul-13-09 09:13 PM |
#440 |

And how is that responsive to the issues I raised? Thanks. |
EFerrari |
Jul-13-09 09:18 PM |
#442 |

It's not!! |
HughMoran |
Jul-13-09 09:21 PM |
#443 |

My venom? ! Wow. |
EFerrari |
Jul-13-09 09:23 PM |
#444 |

Nope, I'm not alerting on anybody any more (well, unless they're clearly a Freeper or it's vile) |
HughMoran |
Jul-13-09 09:28 PM |
#445 |

And you have not addressed a single issue I raised. Your choice. n/t |
EFerrari |
Jul-13-09 09:31 PM |
#447 |

Oh, Poo |
HughMoran |
Jul-13-09 09:46 PM |
#449 |

Yes, you seem to be on an endless loop. |
EFerrari |
Jul-14-09 03:47 AM |
#455 |

For what it's worth, my observations over several days are condensed below. |
Laelth |
Jul-13-09 08:56 PM |
#436 |
 
This post is a correction/supplement to my post above. |
Laelth |
Jul-14-09 01:06 AM |
#452 |

Well, it's been 4 days and someone kicked this thread so I'll say this feature is working better ... |
HughMoran |
Jul-13-09 09:16 PM |
#441 |
 
It is no longer the Greatest Page, if in fact it ever was. |
FlyingSquirrel |
Jul-13-09 09:37 PM |
#448 |

Greatness is now agreed to by consensus |
HughMoran |
Jul-13-09 09:50 PM |
#450 |

Never liked that either. |
FlyingSquirrel |
Jul-13-09 11:05 PM |
#451 |

I think the feature stinks |
Bluenorthwest |
Jul-13-09 09:28 PM |
#446 |

Just an FYI: So far, only 49% have expressed unreserved approval |
FlyingSquirrel |
Jul-14-09 01:19 AM |
#453 |

Astute and significant observation. Thanks for counting. n/t |
Laelth |
Jul-14-09 01:27 AM |
#454 |