Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Let's all take a small step back shall we?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:13 PM
Original message
Let's all take a small step back shall we?
Edited on Thu Jul-02-09 05:14 PM by Javaman
Let's suppose there is a guy in your neighborhood. He appears normal, seems like a decent enough person. Is a good neighbor, lends you his tools, helps people in the neighborhood.

This guy is not famous, didn't write any music, didn't star in a boy band back in the 60's and 70's, didn't moonwalk, doesn't know how to dance, and can't sing a key.

Just your regular schlub.

But then one day, you hear that this adult male, who is in his 30's, is found out to enjoy sleeping with little boys.

What do you think of him now?

Is he a poor misunderstood adult who had a bad childhood and should be given our sympathies because he came from an abused household or like most people of his ilk, be tried for being a pedophile?

Perspective folks. Don't let fame cloud your judgment.

(I know I will get flamed, but so what else is new. knock yourself out. I won't respond)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   No flames from me.  tekisui   Jul-02-09 05:15 PM   #1 
   Accused or proven in court by being convicted?  DJ13   Jul-02-09 05:16 PM   #2 
   My perspective is that if he was as screwed up as Jackson was  Warpy   Jul-02-09 05:16 PM   #3 
   That argument could be used against Jackson.  tekisui   Jul-02-09 05:20 PM   #5 
      He may have turned his inner demons toward good...  AntiFascist   Jul-02-09 05:34 PM   #10 
   i'll bite -- you wouldn't have much time to do your own thinking b/c he'd be in custody  nashville_brook   Jul-02-09 05:19 PM   #4 
   Except Jackson is not a convicted child molester. So, y'know, there's that.  Occam Bandage   Jul-02-09 05:31 PM   #8 
   Your hypothetical leaves several questions unanswered.  Occam Bandage   Jul-02-09 05:21 PM   #6 
   Absolutely Right  Old Codger   Jul-02-09 05:26 PM   #7 
   Was said man convicted in a court of law as doing this?  LynneSin   Jul-02-09 05:33 PM   #9 
   Let's say your local neighborhood lacrosse team has been accused of rape.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Jul-02-09 05:37 PM   #11 
   Just like OJ Simpson  Hydra   Jul-02-09 05:39 PM   #12 
   "The law is a spider's web...  alterfurz   Jul-02-09 06:57 PM   #25 
      Good quote  Hydra   Jul-02-09 09:04 PM   #29 
   No flame. Just a link or two.  Laelth   Jul-02-09 05:52 PM   #13 
   False analogy with foolish arrogance.  Festivito   Jul-02-09 05:55 PM   #14 
   It depends...is the guy worth half a billion bucks?  Philosoraptor   Jul-02-09 06:03 PM   #15 
   The man's dead. Is it bothering you that the whole world doesn't see him as you do?  CakeGrrl   Jul-02-09 06:10 PM   #16 
   ...  Catherine Vincent   Jul-02-09 06:17 PM   #17 
   I had a situation similar to this last year  LiberalEsto   Jul-02-09 06:17 PM   #18 
   A former friend of mine is going to prison for possessing child porn  Philosoraptor   Jul-02-09 08:33 PM   #27 
   I bet EVERY ambitious lawyer in the country contacted this boy's family after this clip aired:  ecstatic   Jul-02-09 06:20 PM   #19 
   Javaman's got a good point. Also,  kimmerspixelated   Jul-02-09 06:26 PM   #20 
   It seems his wealth was a double-edged sword  jmondine   Jul-02-09 06:38 PM   #21 
   If he wasn't MJ the kids wouldn't have been there.  Dappleganger   Jul-02-09 06:40 PM   #22 
   How about this...  anigbrowl   Jul-02-09 06:53 PM   #23 
   I tell ya  hyphenate   Jul-02-09 06:54 PM   #24 
   The Jacko defenders can be a hostile bunch, but basically harmless  Philosoraptor   Jul-02-09 07:00 PM   #26 
   Funny you should depict such a scenario.  Fire1   Jul-02-09 08:42 PM   #28 
   Not defending anything he did but he went in front of a jury  MadMaddie   Jul-02-09 10:23 PM   #30 
   Yea, and don't let the fact that in THIS country, you're INNOCENT til proven guilty cloud yours AND  BigBearJohn   Jul-02-09 10:32 PM   #31 
   How regressive of you  GeorgeGist   Jul-03-09 09:43 AM   #32 
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. No flames from me. Updated at 6:43 PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Accused or proven in court by being convicted?
Makes a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jul-02-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. My perspective is that if he was as screwed up as Jackson was
I'd have noticed it.

Pedophiles are different. They try to blend in, usually by wrapping themselves in the flag and hiding behind the cross while they donate their time to be leaders for scout troops, baby sitters, and other things that give them access.

The nice, normal guy you'd never suspect is likely to be the pedophile. The guy who wears weird clothes and makeup is most likely not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That argument could be used against Jackson.Updated at 6:43 PM
Rather than babysit, he built an amusement park. Instead of leading the boy scouts, he contributed to charities. He had them knocking down the doors to spend time with him, granting major access to children.

The argument that he was too eccentric acting doesn't go far, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. He may have turned his inner demons toward good...

During the trial, I once asked someone from Los Olivos if the residents were glad to see MJ leaving Neverland Ranch. I was surprised to learn that they held deep respect for him because of the fundraisers he held at the ranch, which greatly benefited the local schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. i'll bite -- you wouldn't have much time to do your own thinking b/c he'd be in custody
and the whole affair would be framed way differently than it was with MJ. there'd be no question, as the headlines would read: "No Bond for Alleged Child Molester." And, "Sentencing Begins for Convicted Child Molester."

If it were an average schlub, there would be no mercy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Except Jackson is not a convicted child molester. So, y'know, there's that.
It's entirely likely that he molested children, but the only parents to press charges had such a shoddy case that Jackson was acquitted. As for his fame having an impact? It cuts both ways. It might have made some people look upon him more favorably, and it certainly has after his death. However, it also made quite a few people look upon him extraordinarily unfavorably. "Wacko Jacko" was tried and convicted by the media in 1993; the media decided he was a pedophile, and so that 'fact' passed into general public knowledge. Even on DU--a site full of people entirely mistrustful of the system, and entirely ready to believe people are innocent until proven guilty--a slim majority seems to believe that, without a doubt, Jackson was a pedophile. When considering the impact of his fame on the public perception of his guilt, the '90s blowback must be considered every bit as much as his '80s cultural dominance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Your hypothetical leaves several questions unanswered.
Edited on Thu Jul-02-09 05:36 PM by Occam Bandage
1. Did this neighbor actually come from a severely abusive household?

2. It seems he's leading a normal, functional life; how is this comparable to Jackson's utterly bizarre existence?

3. Do you suggest that we as a society should not have sympathies for the abused and mentally ill?

4. Why do you present him being "a poor misunderstood adult who should be given our sympathies" as opposed to "tried for being a pedophile?" Oughtn't he be given our sympathies for his pain, and at the same time be tried by an impartial court for his alleged crimes? And most importantly of all, isn't that last bit exactly what happened to Michael Jackson? He was tried, and he was acquitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jul-02-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Absolutely Right
No flames here, totally agree...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jul-02-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Was said man convicted in a court of law as doing this?
nuff said.

MJ never had a childhood - NEVER. Yes he was a kid but none of us can begin to imagine the life he lived since he was the meal ticket for the rest of the family. Hell even Mozart was known to be a bit of a nutjob and he pretty much had the same 'childhood' as MJ.

MJ has NEVER been convicted of child molestation. In fact he was AQUITTED of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Let's say your local neighborhood lacrosse team has been accused of rape.
Not some fancy college boys, just your local lacrosse schlubs.

But then one day they get acquitted.

Lynching? Or just a brick through the window?

Don't let due process cloud your judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just like OJ Simpson
Or the call boys scandal at the Whitehouse showed, laws are for the little people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alterfurz Donating Member (322 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. "The law is a spider's web...
...wherein the small and weak are caught, but the big and powerful escape." -- Solon, 6th century BCE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Good quote
The date is unnerving however. As they say, nothing new under the sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. No flame. Just a link or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. False analogy with foolish arrogance.
The contention is that fame destroyed his youth and gave him credible access in retrieving it.

When you take fame, the initiator, out of the analogy, you frame the argument away from a real discussion and head it for a flame fest. To then say that you won't respond is both foolish in lack of substance and arrogant in lack of form.

If you were to include that the neighbor had a destroyed youth, known to you and fellow neighbors, that left him or her in a regressed state of emotional development leaving him needy of reliving or finally living life as a young person, then your arrogantly put surprise would lose effect.

But, then, perhaps it is a flame fest that you want. Forget Micheal, what's your unexpressed need on this board?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. It depends...is the guy worth half a billion bucks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. The man's dead. Is it bothering you that the whole world doesn't see him as you do?
I think it's safe to say that unless you've been taking extreme measures to avoid any news about MJ the past 20 years, we all know all the issues.

At the end of the day, my take is close to that of the President; his legacy as a great entertainer is mixed with darker, sadder elements. And as much as it might gall some, I have the man's music on my iPod, and I will continue to enjoy it.

After reading words in cyberspace cracking the tired pedophile jokes and openly applauding his death, I see the sadness in the faces of his family members which serve as reminder that no one is all good or bad.

Let's hope we're lucky enough not to have to endure some public ridicule and scorn of a loved one after their death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jul-02-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. I had a situation similar to this last year
Someone I've known for about 15 years, as a member of our congregation and as a friend, was arrested last year on federal child pornography charges. He took a plea bargain and was sentenced to 13 years in federal prison.

He's in his 60s, and I hope I never have to see him again. But if he gets released and tries to rejoin our church, he will catch hell from me. I would quit the church rather than tolerate him as a member again, especially since he would pose a serious threat to children. I know he was abused himself as a child, but I have no sympathy for someone who knows better, can afford therapy, and still participates in the child abuse industry. Not everyone who was abused abuses others.

There are few things I hate worse than the sexual abuse of children. I worked for a child abuse prevention program through which I was required to report suspected abuse to Child Protective Services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. A former friend of mine is going to prison for possessing child porn
I used to work with him, swell guy, with a wife and kids, looking at 15 to 110 years. I have ZERO respect for him now, nice guy or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. I bet EVERY ambitious lawyer in the country contacted this boy's family after this clip aired:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. Javaman's got a good point. Also,
Ever since Jackson's death, Walmart's been having a sale. Apparently, it's the only place you can still find little boys pants half off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmondine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jul-02-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. It seems his wealth was a double-edged sword
Being that he could hire the best legal team in the world, he may have thought he could get away with anything.
Then again, that same wealth could have made him the target of false allegations from people wanting money.

I honestly don't know what to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. If he wasn't MJ the kids wouldn't have been there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. How about this...
later, you find out that the stories you heard were false. But by that time, the guy's been hounded out of the neighborhood, or had his house burned down or something like that.

The court of public opinion has no procedures, proper record, or qualified presiding officers. In fact, it's a lynch mob. If the court of public opinion were any good as a discovery mechanism, we wouldn't need regular courts or judicial officers or written laws. So get back to me when your fictional example has had his day in court and been convicted after receiving due process of law in accordance with the basic principles of our constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. I tell ya
Some pedophiles get a pass at DU just because they're famous. It's the same kind of double standard as they claim only right-wingers have, but it's here, and in abundance. While I knew when I posted my thread late last week on this very subject that my opinion was unpopular, I didn't think that DUers would have brought the torches and the hanging rope with them, but they did.

I guess it's trendy to love even the most unscrupulous child molesters, especially if they happen to be famous. What can I say, Javaman? It's been getting creepy for awhile now here at DU, and it's scaring the shit out of me when I see some of the postings I've seen.

I've got your back, but I'm not sure it's enough anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. The Jacko defenders can be a hostile bunch, but basically harmless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
28. Funny you should depict such a scenario.
Something of the sort happened in my neighborhood several years ago, and none of the neighbors ever openly discussed it, to my knowledge. A 'letter,' of sorts was circulated throughout the subdivision identifying this man as a 'child molester.' The letter did not seem 'official,' as there was no letterhead and eliminated my initial suspicion that it was circulated by the state. The man WAS married at the time and has two teen-age children. I never witnessed any activity that would give me reason to suspect him as anyone other than a descent person. So, I threw the letter in the trash and dismissed the letter as a prank by 'someone.' He is divorced from his wife and it appears that they subsequently have their 'issues,' none of which I think are related to the 'letter.'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jul-02-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. Not defending anything he did but he went in front of a jury
and they didn't convict him.

Now the difference between your average joe that you described and a mega millionaire well in this country most of the time money is the get out of jail card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul-02-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yea, and don't let the fact that in THIS country, you're INNOCENT til proven guilty cloud yours AND
Edited on Thu Jul-02-09 10:37 PM by BigBearJohn
talking about perspective, let's all ignore the fact that
Michael Jackson has donated TENS of MILLIONS
to children's causes. But that doesn't count, does it?

I'd like to know what YOU have done to make this world
a better place. You sure are good at wagging your finger
at others. Obviously your hunger to satisfy your ego counts
certainly hasn't clouded YOUR judgement. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jul-03-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. How regressive of you
Thanks for the warning that you're one of the schlubs in the DU neighborhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov 23rd 2009, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC