|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
| deaniac21
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:23 PM Original message |
| Has Helen Thomas gone over to the other side? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| MNDemNY
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Why, because she asked a good question? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gidney N Cloyd
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. I hate to see journalists take any sides. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pkdu
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. MSM ( of all stripes) feels slighted by anything other than their exclusive access |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Richardo
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. I don't know what's on the youtube clip but she's doing what she's done to every President since JFK |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SemiCharmedQuark
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 13. It's from today's press conference. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| deaniac21
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 15. The president wasn't involved. Why would you comment on |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Greybnk48
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Helen Thomas is a REAL news investigator/reporter, for those who are too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| emilyg
|
Wed Jul-01-09 06:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 68. Hear. Hear! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hell Hath No Fury
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Helen is a real journalist -- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| texastoast
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 22. No, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hell Hath No Fury
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 29. I know -- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 43. I don't think journalism has never really been quite as good as you imagine. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DJ13
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. She has always held politicians responsible to keep their promises |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clio the Leo
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Annoying isn't it...... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dmr
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 61. No, Gibbs dug himself into a needless smart-alecky hole |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Clio the Leo
|
Wed Jul-01-09 07:57 PM Response to Reply #61 |
| 73. Everything Gibbs learned about being flippant..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| boston bean
|
Wed Jul-01-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 82. HELEN HAD THE RIGHT IDEA I THINK, THAT WOMAN WORKS FOR THE CHANGE CAMPAIGN IN THE DNC |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Versailles
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Other side?! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sisters6
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. WE need a million more Helen's. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cboy4
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. What was wrong with the point Reid and Helen were arguing? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SemiCharmedQuark
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 17. I think their point on the Townhall was a good one, but I disagree with the outrage over the Iran |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cboy4
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 23. I'll yield to her experience, as to whether advising reporters in advance |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mari333
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. she is a real journalist, the real deal |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lex
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 16. Exactly. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Eric J in MN
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Robert Gibbs is the annoying one in that YouTube video. NT |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aikoaiko
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Gibbs was being a real weener because he didn't like the questions. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dawgs
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. No. Just wrong on the facts, and completely unprofessional. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| deaniac21
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:41 PM Original message |
| That sure isn't what she is saying. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dawgs
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. Really? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| deaniac21
|
Thu Jul-02-09 04:02 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 83. She said that this administration was most controlling she had |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alc
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:56 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 35. meaning of "town hall" meeting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 39. As if that wasn't already questioned. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lorien
|
Wed Jul-01-09 09:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 81. Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton for starters |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| scheming daemons
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. No.... she just became a caricature of herself about 15 years ago.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Wed Jul-01-09 06:02 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 64. Boy, that's ugly. And I sure don't remember you calling her out |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| scheming daemons
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. Dupe |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Daphne08
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. The only "side" a journalist should take is the side of the truth. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cboy4
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. By the way, I'd like to give a shout out to all of the usual Obama apologists who |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 37. This requires an apology? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Divine Discontent
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 55. but I'm disappointed, they're not all here.. :( |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| YOY
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. No. She's defending her profession from bloggers. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DatManFromNawlins
|
Wed Jul-01-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 70. No she isn't |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SoCalDem
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. Perhaps Helen is not "feeling the love", she thought she'd get |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| earth mom
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. Are you fucking kidding me? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jackeens
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. Helen: "The point is the control....we have never had that in the White House." HELEN!!!!!!!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 38. NIbble around the edges., you may never have to deal with the fact |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jackeens
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 42. I adore her, I think she's a legend, but I thought that particular claim was daft! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 44. Helen Thomas was right to object to the filtering of information. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jackeens
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:17 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 46. So you agree with her claim, that no previous President has attempted to 'filter' information? Ok. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 62. No, I think that her main point is right. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rvablue
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 58. She has every right to complain. I wasn't thrilled about the idea. But why didn't Helen speak up |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Cha
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:15 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 45. "No previous president has tried to control the media/agenda?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| demmiblue
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. I find it strange that anyone would think so?! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| arcadian
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Thanks for making DU look like FreeRepublic. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nicholas D Wolfwood
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. No. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| azmouse
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. I admire her consistency. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| timeforpeace
|
Wed Jul-01-09 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. Where Helen leads, the press corps follows. Plus belittling her may backfire. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| omega minimo
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. Depends on which "side" you're on. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| G_j
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:48 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 51. I was gonna say that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| omega minimo
|
Wed Jul-01-09 06:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 66. So many great comments in the thread already, it's all been said!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ficus1
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 47. She went over to the daft side today |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| omega minimo
|
Wed Jul-01-09 06:20 PM Response to Reply #47 |
| 67. She'd eat you for breakfast |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| That Is Quite Enough
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 48. Jesus Hoobastank Christ on a stick. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| uppityperson
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. No. eom |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cherokeeprogressive
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. 1:21 Gibbs: "The questions were selected by people that email on Facebook and Twitter". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| marshall
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. She's on her own side--the side of objectively challenging authority with questions |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spoony
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. For Helen's sake, can I at least ask |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| donco6
|
Wed Jul-01-09 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 54. It's been so long since anyone's seen a real journalist - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Divine Discontent
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 56. HA!!!! that is perfect! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lorien
|
Wed Jul-01-09 09:09 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 80. Indeed. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bigwillq
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 57. No. We need more like her. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| shadowknows69
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 59. So can some of you pinpoint the time you became like a Republican or is it a mystery? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Vidar
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 60. Helen Thomas is a real journalist. Staged "Town Halls" are Bush League stunts. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OmmmSweetOmmm
|
Wed Jul-01-09 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 63. Gibbs reminds me of a used car salesman. Helen/Reid seem to have a valid point. Maybe you're on the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EFerrari
|
Wed Jul-01-09 06:14 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 65. It's funny because I defended Gibbs against the very same people |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OmmmSweetOmmm
|
Wed Jul-01-09 07:50 PM Response to Reply #65 |
| 71. That's weird. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bamacrat
|
Wed Jul-01-09 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 69. Shes asking good questions but.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dmr
|
Wed Jul-01-09 08:46 PM Response to Reply #69 |
| 76. No, they stopped calling on her for asking relevant questions n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HiFructosePronSyrup
|
Wed Jul-01-09 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 72. I think she might be the Susan Boyle of the WH press corp. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| scarletwoman
|
Wed Jul-01-09 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 74. Helen is a journalist -- and a damn fine one -- she's not supposed to be on a "side". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mark Twain Girl
|
Wed Jul-01-09 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 75. What, are actual journalists on the other side now? I'm not even sure what the sides are anymore. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arkana
|
Wed Jul-01-09 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 77. No, but I think her criticisms are misguided. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BlooInBloo
|
Wed Jul-01-09 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 78. She's a member of the journalistic establishment, which we're watching die before our eyes... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lorien
|
Wed Jul-01-09 09:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 79. No, she's a journalist, not a groupie. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 24th 2013, 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC