Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Peruvian Government Shelves Investigation into Massive Forced Sterilizations of Indigenous Women

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 02:34 AM
Original message
Peruvian Government Shelves Investigation into Massive Forced Sterilizations of Indigenous Women
Peruvian Government Shelves Investigation into Massive Forced Sterilizations of Indigenous Women
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent

LIMA, June 19, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Peru's government has decided to end its investigation against former health officials for thousands of forced sterilizations carried out during the late 1990s, under president Alberto Fujimori.

Human rights organizations have thoroughly documented evidence that women were physically coerced, threatened, tricked, and enticed with economic incentives during the implementation of the program, which sterilized a total of approximately 400,000 Peruvian women in just two years, 1997 and 1998, with the help of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).

The coercive actions of program officials have been tied to pressure from the Peruvian government to meet pre-set sterilization quotas. The economic incentives offered to desperately poor women have also been criticized as coercive, and violated existing international standards for such programs.

However, the Provincial Prosecutor in charge of human rights cases, Jaime Jose Swartz, reportedly claims that there is insufficient evidence to charge the nation's health ministers and other program personnel for human rights abuses.

The decision to shelve the case has sparked protests from pro-life organizations, as well as human rights and feminist groups.

More:
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=26872
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. oh, it was so long ago. & those people have too many children anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, there should be enough of them to do ALL the slave labor, then whatever's left over can fight
any and all real or bogus wars, just the way we've got it here.

No more than that, obviously. We can't have them electing Presidents, etc., you know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. USAID Supporting Forced Sterilization in Peru?
Edited on Sun Jun-28-09 02:47 AM by Judi Lynn
Thursday March 16, 2000
USAID SUPPORTING FORCED STERILIZATION IN PERU?

WASHINGTON, Mar 16 (LSN.ca) - On Tuesday, US Congressmen Todd Tiahrt and Chris Smith called for an investigation into allegations brought by the Population Research Institute (PRI) which has found evidence that the Peruvian government is using money from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) for forced sterilization of women. Earlier evidence of such activity led to the passing of the Tiahrt Amendment on 25 October 1998, which ensures that US funds will only go to "voluntary" family planning programs.

However, during a December 1999 investigation, PRI obtained additional testimony from Peru about recent, ongoing abuses in Peru's state-run family planning program. The Conservative News Service (CNS) reports that USAID continues to fund family planning projects overseen by the Peruvian Ministry of Health (MOH) and its associated, semi-official NGO, A.B. Prisma with $36 million a year.

PRI investigators produced testimonies of native women who described their tragic dealings with coerced sterilization and abortion. However, Steven W. Mosher, PRI president, said victims and Peruvian doctors who furnished investigators with evidences of abuses declined to testify in public for fear of reprisals by Peruvian authorities.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2000/mar/00031602.html

~~~~~~~~

On edit, adding:

Poor Women Charge Forced Sterilization
Insight on the News, April 24, 2000 by Catherine Edwards
1234Next »..The United States gave $105 million this year to USAID for Peru. Human-rights workers say some of that money is being used to run forced-sterilization campaigns.

Beatriz lost her baby after receiving shots of the birth-control drug Depo-Provera while she was pregnant. No one administering the drug had asked if Beatriz was pregnant or warned her about possible side effects. Health officials later informed her that she was "too stupid" to continue on a program of monthly injections of Depo-Provera, she says, and that if she refused other forms of birth control she would be sterilized.

According to reports by U.S. human-rights investigators, Beatriz is one of a number of women in Peru who have been coerced by the Peruvian health ministry into accepting birth control against their will. And Americans paid for it.

This year, Congress gave $105 million to the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, for use in Peru -- with part of that going to the Peruvian Ministry of Health, or PMOH, for family planning. Federal law forbids the use of U.S. funds for family-planning programs that are coercive. But last month lawmakers on Capitol Hill expressed concern that tax dollars were funding coercive birth-control programs in Peru and called for USAID to launch an official investigation.

All this comes at a time when Peru's president, Alberto Fujimori, is running for reelection under close international scrutiny because of alleged election fraud, restriction of press freedom and a general iron-fisted approach to government. Forced sterilization is part of that record.

Peru's constitution states that life begins at conception, but in 1995 Fujimori lifted the long-standing legal ban on sterilization for reasons other than medical necessity. Sterilization campaigns began.

More:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_15_16/ai_62024132/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Good God. Speechless. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. There are also economic steralizations
Edited on Sun Jun-28-09 02:51 AM by RandomThoughts
Where women on a job application have to sign some form that they have had tubal ligation.

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/12/07/world/brazil-women-find-fertility-may-cost-jobs.html

This is part of the program of some people that believe they are better and wanting to make it so only a certain group has more children.

If a person believes that the world population is too high, they should solve the problem by not having children themselves, but feelings of superiority instead make them target other groups. No person should be deprived of the right to have a modest family and children if they choose.

Also the level of sperm count in one study has shown a drop of 1% a year starting in 1938

http://www.slate.com/id/2140985
The great sperm-count debate began in 1992, when a group of Danish scientist published a study suggesting that sperm counts declined globally by about 1 percent a year between 1938 and 1990. This study postulated that "environmental influences," particularly widely used chemical compounds with an impact like that of the female hormone estrogen, might be contributing to a drop in fertility among males.

(belief system note)
If you believe in the concept that God is all powerful, yet evil has limited power, then higher populations dilute the attempts of evil to do things. I often ponder if that is why the commandment to multiply was first given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. oh, it was so long ago. & those people have too many non-white children anyway. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Genocide - brought to you by the Farrish family - ever since Auschwitz!
Edited on Sun Jun-28-09 03:54 AM by Democracyinkind
I just love the Bushes friends - aren't they lovely?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
8. This country's version of Peruvian eugenics is still lawful.
Buck v. Bell has not been overturned, thus allowing federal or state government to enact laws to allow compelled sterilization on any citizen, albeit with a cursory hearing before the procedure.

Shame on us, and shame on Peru.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. every link i followed in this story goes back to anti-choice sites
the links are to right wing catholic groups,antiabortion groups,and un/usa family planning groups. i found no links to any moderate to left wing groups in peru or the usa that certainly would have objected to the right wing government in peru sterilizing women. now they are claiming that african women are be forced to be sterilized for food....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Interesting. I'd never looked into it, not suspecting any agenda. Here's material from Wiki., etc.
Compulsory sterilization

~snip~
Other countries

Eugenics programs including forced sterilization existed in most Northern European countries, as well as other more or less Protestant countries. Some programs, such as Canada's and Sweden's, lasted well into the 1970s. Other countries that had notably active sterilization programs include Australia, Norway, Finland, Estonia, Switzerland, Iceland, and some countries in Latin America (including Panama).<26> In the United Kingdom, Home Secretary Winston Churchill introduced a bill that included forced sterilization. Writer G. K. Chesterton led a successful effort to defeat that clause of the 1913 Mental Deficiency Act. The Roman Catholic Church has been a notable opponent of eugenics and sterilization programs. In Peru, former president Alberto Fujimori (1990-2000) pressured 200,000 indigenous people in rural areas (mainly Quechuas and Aymaras) into being sterilized.<27>

According to some testimonies, The Soviet Union allegedly imposed forced sterilization on female workers deported from Romania to Soviet labor camps. This is said to have occurred after World War II, when Romania was supposed to supply a reconstruction workforce (according to the armistice convention).<28> However, no court decisions or formal investigations of this allegations are known for the moment. India and China have also at various times implemented sterilization campaigns as a population control policy, though only the latter has made any previous overtures towards any potential eugenic motivations.

Czechoslovakia carried out a policy of sterilization of Roma women, starting in 1973.<29> The dissidents of the Charter 77 denounced it in 1977-78 as a "genocide", but the practice continued through the Velvet Revolution of 1989.<30> A 2005 report by the Czech government's independent ombudsman, Otakar Motejl, identified dozens of cases of coercive sterilization between 1979 and 2001, and called for criminal investigations and possible prosecution against several health care workers and administrators.<15>

In October 1999, Margrith von Felten suggested to the National Council of Switzerland in the form of a general proposal to adopt legal regulations that would enable reparation for persons sterilised against their will. According to the proposal, reparation was to be provided to persons who had undergone the intervention without their consent or who had consented to sterilisation under coercion. According to Margrith von Felten:
“ The history of eugenics in Switzerland remains insufficiently explored. Research programmes are in progress. However, individual studies and facts are already available. For example:
The report of the Institute for the History of Medicine and Public Health "Mental Disability and Sexuality. Legal Sterilisation in the Vaud Canton between 1928 and 1985" points out that coercive sterilisations took place until the 1980s. The act on coercive sterilisations of the Vaud Canton was the first law of this kind in the European context.

Hans Wolfgang Maier, head of the Psychiatric Clinic in Zurich pointed out in a report from the beginning of the century that 70% to 80% of terminations were linked to sterilisation by doctors. In the period from 1929 to 1931, 480 women and 15 men were sterilised in Zurich in connection with termination.

Following agreements between doctors and authorities such as the 1934 "Directive For Surgical Sterilisation" of the Medical Association in Basle, eugenic indication to sterilisation was recognised as admissible.

A statistical evaluation of the sterilisations performed in the Basle women's hospital between 1920 and 1934 shows a remarkable increase in sterilisations for a psychiatric indication after 1929 and a steep increase in 1934, when a coercive sterilisation act came into effect in nearby National Socialist Germany.

A study by the Swiss Nursing School in Zurich, published in 1991, documents that 24 mentally-disabled women aged between 17 and 25 years were sterilised between 1980 and 1987. Of these 24 sterilisations, just one took place at the young woman's request.

Having evaluated sources primarily from the 1930s (psychiatric files, official directives, court files, etc.), historians have documented that the requirement for free consent to sterilisation was in most of cases not satisfied. Authorities obtained the "consent" required by the law partly by persuasion, and partly by enforcing it through coercion and threats. Thus the recipients of social benefits were threatened with removal of the benefits, women were exposed to a choice between placement in an institution or sterilisation, and abortions were permitted only when women simultaneously consented to sterilisation.

More than fifty years after ending the National Socialist dictatorship in Germany, in which racial murder, euthanasia and coerced sterilisations belonged to the political programme, it is clear that eugenics, with its idea of "life unworthy of life" and "racial purity" permeated even democratic countries. The idea that a "healthy nation" should be achieved through targeted medical/social measures was designed and politically implemented in many European countries and in the U.S.A in the first half of this century. It is a policy incomparable with the inconceivable horrors of the Nazi rule; yet it is clear that authorities and the medical community were guilty of the methods and measures applied, i.e. coerced sterilisations, prohibitions of marriages and child removals – serious violations of human rights.<15>
Switzerland refused, however, to vote a reparations Act.More:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization

~~~~~~~~~~~~

Fujimori's Forced Sterilization Program in Peru
nytr at tania.blythe-systems.com nytr at tania.blythe-systems.com
Sun May 16 13:36:17 EDT 2004

Le Monde diplomatique May 2004
http://MondeDiplo.com/2004/05/08sterilisation

Peru's government wants to extradite former President Alberto Fujimori
from sanctuary in Japan in connection with assassinations in the 1990s.
But his government's eugenic policy, which encouraged the sterilisation of
300,000 women from poor Amerindian communities, has not been mentioned

Peru: the scandal of forced sterilisation

by Francoise Barthelemy
Translated by Julie Stoker

HALLYCOCHA is an Amerindian community in Laguna Pampa in the Andean
uplands, 50 kilometres from Cuzco, Peru. Here farmers till the land using
ox-drawn ploughs. In one of the ramshackle houses lives Hilaria Supa
Huamon, her hands deformed by arthritis; she has just come back from her
chacra, the small plot where she grows corn, maize and potatoes.

In 1991 Hilaria was one of the founders of the women's Peasant Federation
of Anta, which is a largely rural province with about 80,000 inhabitants.
Three years later she became its secretary-general and in that capacity
took part in the 1995 IVth World Conference on Women in Beijing. That gave
her the opportunity to speak to President Albert Fujimori. "He began
talking to me about a family planning health care programme he wanted to
launch. I said: 'Fine, provided husbands and wives take decisions
jointly.' 'Of course,' he said."

Some months later, under strong pressure from the village nurse and
without any detailed information, Hilaria had tubal ligation surgery and
found it hard to recover. "They insult you by saying: 'Do you want to
breed like a pig? Your husband will be angry if you do nothing,'" she
says. "Afterwards they assure you that you will soon be back on your feet.
That's not true. The scar outside heals, but internally healing is slow
because our work is so physically demanding."

She is not alone is suffering side-effects. Her friend who lives in
Mollepata says that she too is "very much weakened" after tubal ligation.
Disturbing facts have emerged from several communities including
Mollepata, Limatambo and Ancahuasi. It was claimed that women visiting the
dispensary for health checks for their children were locked in, sometimes
in groups of 10 or 20. They were told they were to be vaccinated and then
taken individually to the operating theatre and anaesthetised. They came
out feeling groggy. Later they realised they had been sterilised.

More:
http://www.blythe-systems.com/pipermail/nytr/Week-of-Mon-20040510/001563.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Forced sterilization of indigenous case re-opened in Peru
By Rick Kearns, Today correspondent

Story Published: Feb 20, 2009

(Story Updated: Feb 20, 2009 )

The investigation into the forced sterilization of 300,000 indigenous Peruvian women is being re-opened, according to the Public Ministry of Peru. This follow-up effort was announced Jan. 7 and will seek out the program’s administrators. It had been part of the larger case against former Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori, who is facing other criminal counts.

Fujimori is awaiting the final disposition of his case in which he is being charged with kidnapping as well as ordering two massacres that resulted in the deaths of 25 people. If convicted he faces up to 30 years in prison. The original charges against him involved other human rights violations including his knowing supervision of the forced sterilization of indigenous women. The so-called “Voluntary Surgical Contraception” Program was enacted between 1997 and 2000.

After hundreds of women started registering complaints during that time period and international pressure started to mount, the Peruvian Congress convened their own investigation which showed that most of the women were tricked or forced into the procedure, and that at least two women died as a result of the operations. Peru’s Health Ministry issued a public apology to the country in 2002 – after the case had received international attention – at which point investigators were asserting that former President Fujimori knew about the coercion and threats.

“…the forced sterilizations focused on poor, indigenous, Quechua-speaking and Aymara women,” said women’s rights advocate Maria Esther Mogollon. She is a member of MAM Fundacional, the women’s rights organization that helped a group of victims present their case to federal authorities.

“The total number came to be 300,000 women and 22,000 men (who received vasectomies). … the majority of whom did not sign informed consent statements and were also subjected to threats, coercion and other violations.

More:
http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/global/39910172.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

RIGHTS-PERU: Forcibly Sterilised Women Gain Voice in Congress
By Ángel Páez

LIMA, Jul 10 (IPS) - Congressman-elect Alejandro Aguinaga, a former health minister during the Alberto Fujimori administration (1990-2000), as of Jul. 28 will have to share the legislative chamber with rural activist Hilaria Supa Huamán, who has denounced him for promoting the forced sterilisation of hundreds of thousands of Peruvian women.

Supa, who will occupy a seat representing Union for Peru - the party that supported the presidential candidacy of nationalist Ollanta Humala - formally accused Aguinaga, elected by the pro-Fujimori Alliance for the Future, of promoting a forced sterilisation programme which deprived 363,000 Peruvian women of their right to motherhood.

The case is currently in the hands of prosecutor Héctor Villar, who specialises in human rights. Sources at his office told IPS that the magistrate is detailing the responsibility of the former health authorities in order to present charges.

When Supa lodged the accusation during Fujimori's administration, she never imagined that her leadership in defence of the rights of women in Cusco, in the south of the country, would take her so far. Today, this poor, indigenous, Quechua-speaking mother is a member of Congress, just like Aguinaga.

Aguinaga said he could not recall who Supa was when IPS asked him about the rural women's leader from Cusco.

"I have just heard that she has been elected to Congress," he said. "No doubt we will have the opportunity to talk. What Peru needs now is development policies and not to keep harping on about the same things (the forced sterilisations), that have already been cleared up and shelved."

IPS told the former minister that a prosecutor is investigating the case and is about to bring charges, and that Supa would propose in Congress that those responsible for implementing the VSC programme should be punished.

"As far as I'm concerned, the matter is closed," said Aguinaga. "We have to take action on issues of importance to the country, like the maternal mortality rate which continues to be high. Reproductive health is the priority now."

Aguinaga also said he was unaware of the status of the investigation he is subjected to by the human rights prosecutor. "I do not know what the situation is."

But Supa is not about to let the past be forgotten. From 1996 to 2000, with the aim of drastically lowering the birth rate in Peru's most impoverished areas, Fujimori implemented the Voluntary Surgical Contraception (VSC) programme. Medical VSC brigades were dispatched to every corner of the country, including the southern Cusco town of Anta, near the rural community of Ollacocha, where Supa hails from.

After surgery, six of Supa's neighbours experienced terrible pain as a result of the ligation of their fallopian tubes. Supa recorded their testimonies, and those of other women in nearby communities who had undergone VSC, and she discovered that in Anta province, the Health Ministry teams were recruiting rural women with false promises or through intimidation.

More:
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=33918

ETC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. i`m sorry if i offended you
reading your posts all these years i was wondering why you were using these right-wing sites. i noticed in the new links that the un and us programs knew nothing about what was going on or who knows-did`t care.

i have heard tales of forced sterilizations at the state mentally disabled facility in my city. the facility closed years ago and all the records destroyed so we will never know the truth.

thanks for the links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-28-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Farrish knew. It's along story, I'm working on a long thread to prove just that.

I still need to read 4 books on my heap before I can do that though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC