|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Bjorn Against
|
Wed Jun-24-09 08:57 PM Original message |
| Something stinks and it smells a lot worse than a mere sex scandal. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| Tangerine LaBamba
|
Wed Jun-24-09 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Normally, I'd agree with you, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. There may be an affair, but how do we know there is not more than that? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mojorabbit
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. There is a statement from his wife on the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. I still think we need to ask the questions. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| malaise
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 18. I think the interest was his mistress |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ControlledDemolition
(897 posts)
|
Wed Jun-24-09 10:12 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 23. His mistress may be a mister? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anigbrowl
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 01:22 AM Response to Reply #23 |
| 29. Even if that were true, why the sudden urgency? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dyedinthewoolliberal
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 56. The head he used for thinking |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smirkymonkey
|
Thu Jun-25-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 63. I agree with you - I don't think someone in that position would do |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tangerine LaBamba
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 11. Absolutely, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
|
Thu Jun-25-09 04:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 44. My husband swears there's still another shoe that hasn't dropped. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Historic NY
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. What interests does he have in that foreign country? Has he involved the state. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostInAnomie
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. "Is there a reason that she couldn't have traveled here?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. He is married has four kids and a state to run. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostInAnomie
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 9. Personally, I think that he probably went down there to convince her to keep quiet... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 12. Maybe, but I don't see any reason to believe his version of events. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anigbrowl
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 01:27 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 31. That doesn't really make sense though |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jester Messiah
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 59. Slightly o/t, but... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| southerncrone
|
Sat Jun-27-09 01:42 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 69. I feel the same way. Toooo goofy to believe. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democrat 4 Ever
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 11:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 54. What about the other woman? Is she a government official? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countingbluecars
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. I read that he owns |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| wiggs
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. General rule: Anytime a republican leader admits to a mistake in public you can |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| troubledamerican
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:17 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 33. Bingo. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fascisthunter
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 65. . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Maybe the woman is a Moonie? Or is better to say she is a Rev. Moon follower? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. Interesting, there are many things that we need to look at. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| troubledamerican
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:19 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 34. Best general post ever. I'm sick of the "face value" DU suckerdom. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 04:26 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 45. Here's a "coincidence" for you. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| troubledamerican
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 60. Bannable link, off-topic, and not related to my remarks. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lydia Leftcoast
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:38 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 16. My first thought was the Paraguay connection, too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| southerncrone
|
Sat Jun-27-09 01:22 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 68. Same here, I posted as much on one of the earlier threads on this story. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Turbineguy
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 20. Here's a nice airport: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:09 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 25. her English says she is not American. Their emails are on MCClatchy site. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Yes, the love-stricken, nookie-deprived Govornicator just walking away from his duties as |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. Like an abortion or something? | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SmileyRose
|
Wed Jun-24-09 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. Sanford's weeniegate is as important to me as was the Clenis. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
|
Wed Jun-24-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 21. What I am saying is that this may be about a lot more than his weenie. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
|
Thu Jun-25-09 01:24 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 30. Yeah ... at least Monica gave Clinton another reason to stay IN the Oval Office. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anigbrowl
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 01:30 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 32. On the job - even when I'm on the job! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SmileyRose
|
Thu Jun-25-09 06:55 AM Response to Reply #32 |
| 50. Snort |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaydeeBug
|
Wed Jun-24-09 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. I think he was in Colorado with Ted Haggart's boyfriend. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MzShellG
(770 posts)
|
Wed Jun-24-09 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. That notion has been in the back of my mind... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
| 26. What is so bizarre is that he wasn't even trying not to get caught. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Irreverend IX
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 03:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 42. The timing of the email leak was way too convenient. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 06:29 AM Response to Reply #42 |
| 49. they'd had the emails for months |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 58. December, the story goes, but even that is vague, according |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anigbrowl
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 27. I normally don't go for tinfoil headwear, but this time I'm inclined to agree |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
|
Thu Jun-25-09 01:21 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 28. "..almost calculated to attract attention.." You put your finger right on it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| anigbrowl
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:40 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 39. Here's some food for thought... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 35. my question, how's they get the emails? who released them? why are there no legal issues? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:38 AM Response to Reply #35 |
| 37. Either the wife of the mistress sent the emails. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:52 AM Response to Reply #37 |
| 40. the paper got the emails one year ago - approx the same time the affair started. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian
|
Thu Jun-25-09 07:15 AM Response to Reply #37 |
| 51. That's a good point about his enemies |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
| 36. What I think -- the lady was in shake-down mode?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. I agree. Sex +. His story makes no sense. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Politicalboi
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. Maybe after losing his family |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Marr
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 03:35 AM Response to Original message |
| 43. I think you make a very good point. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| salguine
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 46. I'd rather focus on healthcare, thanks. I hope others would, too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| asteroid2003QQ47
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 05:16 AM Response to Reply #46 |
| 47. 'Other' checking in. Back to healthcare! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dorkulon
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 05:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 48. What would be worse, from a PR perspective? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against
|
Thu Jun-25-09 08:52 AM Response to Reply #48 |
| 52. Criminal charges could hurt him worse, it is not all about PR if there is prison time involved. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Tyrone Slothrop
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 66. Drug trafficking? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Wiley50
|
Thu Jun-25-09 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 53. Yeah!They say he was in Communicado. I've checked. There is no town in Argentina named Communicado! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 55. badabumpa! :-) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jester Messiah
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 57. The simplest explanation is usually correct. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nolabels
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:32 PM Response to Reply #57 |
| 62. Yep, no doubt, participating in some S&M with space aliens being the obvious answer |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OPERATIONMINDCRIME
|
Thu Jun-25-09 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 61. Take The Tin Foil Off. Not Everything Is A Conspiracy. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
|
Thu Jun-25-09 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 64. Okay, I'll put my tinfoil hat on for a moment. There seems to be a |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian
|
Fri Jun-26-09 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 67. They like to wrap you in Tin-Foil if you question the Fairy Tail. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Jun-27-09 01:46 AM Response to Original message |
| 70. I think the reverse vampires are involved |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Nov 23rd 2009, 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC