Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Many private companies successfully compete on the same playing field as public services

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-22-09 07:37 AM
Original message
Many private companies successfully compete on the same playing field as public services
Public libraries have not put bookstores out of business. Fedex and UPS compete successfully with the US Postal Service. The introduction of Social Security survivors’ benefits left plenty of room for many different kinds of private life insurance. If private health insurers are worried about competing with government financed health care, they are admitting that they add no value to the health care system whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   I love the argument  SteelPenguin   Jun-22-09 07:49 AM   #1 
   i know. it is so ridiculous. and the first question asked of every  ejpoeta   Jun-22-09 08:27 AM   #2 
   I just used this in an LTE to the Seattle Times  eridani   Jun-23-09 05:53 AM   #3 
 
SteelPenguin (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-22-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I love the argument
a) Government is inefficient and corrupt. If we put them in charge of our health care it would cost everyone more, and we'd get less service.

b) If people were offered a government plan alongside private plans they'd choose the government one because it would be cheaper, and offer more services than a comparably priced private plan.

*blinks*

What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-22-09 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i know. it is so ridiculous. and the first question asked of everyUpdated at 9:00 AM
rep who is against even a public option should be asked why a public plan is good for them and why they haven't instead opted for a private one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jun-23-09 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. I just used this in an LTE to the Seattle Times
Feel free to rip of parts of it.

All kinds of private companies successfully compete on the same playing field as public services. Public libraries have not put Elliott Bay Books out of business. Fedex and UPS compete successfully with the US Postal Service. The introduction of Social Security survivors’ benefits left plenty of room for many different kinds of private life insurance. If private health insurers are worried about competing with government financed health care, they are admitting straight out that they add no value to the health care system whatsoever.

Which, come to think of is, is pretty much the case. A business model predicated on profiting from bankrupting or killing people by refusing to pay claims and by refusing to cover actual sick people adds negative value. They've publicly said as much to congressional investigators. A subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee recently held a hearing intended to bring a halt to this practice. But at the hearing, insurance executives told lawmakers they have no plans to stop rescinding policies. Odd, but I've never heard of that happening with Medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov 23rd 2009, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC