Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IT GETS WORSE AND WORSE SHOULD BE IN GENERAL FORUM, PLEASE MOVE ME

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:51 PM
Original message
IT GETS WORSE AND WORSE SHOULD BE IN GENERAL FORUM, PLEASE MOVE ME
Edited on Thu Jun-18-09 07:56 PM by HowHasItComeToThis
Senate Democrats pare subsidies in health care legislation in bid for GOP support
By David Espo and Erica Werner, Associated Press Writers
On Thursday June 18, 2009, 8:38 pm EDT
Buzz up! 0 Print
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Key Senate Democrats, bidding for bipartisan support on health care, pared back subsidies designed to make insurance more affordable on Thursday and floated a compromise that rules out direct government competition against private insurers.

Despite the cost-cutting, the proposal backed by Sen. Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, requires most individuals to purchase coverage and forbids insurance companies from denying it on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions.

The brief outline did not specify how the government's costs would be covered, although Baucus and many Republicans favor a tax on certain employer-provided health benefits. The Montana Democrat has said he intends to hold the cost of the legislation to about $1 trillion, well below the $1.6 estimate the Congressional Budget Office made of an earlier set of options.

Across the Capitol, Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee privately circulated a list of possible tax increases to pay for expanded health care.

They ranged from raising the Medicare tax, slapping a 10 percent tax on a can of sweetened drink, raising the alcohol tax, imposing a new tax on employers equal to 3 percent of payroll and taxing employer-provided health insurance benefits above certain levels.

Also under consideration was a value added tax, a sort of national sales tax, of up to 1.5 percent, with housing, education, financial services and medical care exempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. you've got three real strikes on this post
Copyright
Link
Forum Placement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. AM FIXING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBluenoser Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-18-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He did get points for the hysterical all caps headline though...
...very gungeonish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC