Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Closing the Benefits Loophole

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 11:44 AM
Original message
Closing the Benefits Loophole
June 1, 2009

Closing the Benefits Loophole

By ELLEN E. SCHULTZ
WSJ

A bipartisan group of legislators is pressing the Treasury Department to close a loophole that has allowed banks to seize Social Security and disability benefits from customers' accounts despite federal rules intended to protect these benefits from creditors. The loophole also has enabled some banks to seize from customers their recent $250 Economic Recovery Payments, payments to disabled veterans, and supplemental benefits to impoverished individuals from the Social Security Administration.

Federal law says creditors can't take Social Security, disability, veterans' and children's survivor benefits to pay a debt. But the federal law doesn't say how money deposited directly into bank accounts is to be protected -- a gap that has given banks the ability to seize such funds. And when banks receive garnishment orders from debt collectors, they freeze customers' accounts and collect fees, including a charge to freeze the account, as well as overdraft and other charges -- all of which can be taken from Social Security benefits.

The Treasury and Social Security Administration, along with banking regulators, developed proposed regulations early this year that close the loophole. But the regulations are in limbo. In separate letters in May to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, members of the Senate Special Committee on Aging as well as House members including Barney Frank urged that the Treasury issue regulations to stop banks from freezing benefits and seizing fees.

In a recent hearing before being confirmed as the Treasury's assistant secretary for financial institutions, Michael Barr said one of his first priorities will be to issue "a joint regulation to solve the problem of account freezes and garnishment of exempt funds." Mr. Geithner wasn't immediately available for comment.

(snip)

Bank of America Corp. froze the accounts of Ellistine and Roosevelt Thompson, a disabled couple in their 60s in Macon, Ga., whose only source of income is from Social Security. Because the Thompsons had no access to their money, they couldn't retain a lawyer. Bank of America turned over all the benefits, some of which they set aside for their burial, to a debt collector pursuing a debt from the mid-1990s. The couple learned from a TV news program that creditors can't take Social Security benefits. They contacted Georgia Legal Services Program, which last year sued the bank seeking the return of the couples' money.

(snip)



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124361324245066727.html (subscription)

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page C1

Steps to protect your Social Security, disability, veteran's or pension benefits:

* Don't commingle Social Security and exempt benefits with nonexempt funds.
* Don't get a loan or credit card from the bank where your Social Security or pension is deposited.
* If sued, go to court and demand proof of the debt.
* If your bank account is frozen, file an exemption claim within 10 days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-02-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. It has become our habit to separate
the banks were direct deposits go, the one that holds the mortgage and the one issuing credit card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC