Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The real question to ask "pro-lifers":

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:07 PM
Original message
The real question to ask "pro-lifers":
Do you think women who have abortions should go to jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. I posted on this already.
I found a video of a guy interviewing protesters, on YouTube:


Guy makes YouTube video asking if women should be punished for having abortions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk6t_tdOkwo

They seem to be stunned at the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Even worse, should they also be
assassinated for their 'crime'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've seen that question asked a few times
on winger forums. Generally, the response runs about 10% Yes and 90% No. That may be because so many of them have had abortions or have someone close to them who has. As usual, they aren't willing to suffer or have their friends suffer. Just strangers.

It's an extension of the "Let's You And Him Fight" philosophy most wingers have. They're happy to send your sons and daughters off to war, but not theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. doesn't work for me
how about since the primary reason for abortion is financial, will you pay 100% more in taxes to reduce the number of abortions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. never mind, I read again and get what you are saying. They should pay
Edited on Mon Jun-01-09 03:28 PM by uppityperson
if they want the woman to not have an abortion. However, "the primary reason for abortion is financial," is only an assumption on your part as there are plenty of other reasons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. no there are lots of studies
and if you look at the reasons, I can't afford to have a child and I'm too young to have a child (education plus income plus capacity) are over 50% by themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallylou666 Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Medical reasons - no speculation, please
The decision to have an abortion is *not* necessarily because of finances. Medical considerations often lead to the decision. That's why we should not speculate on the "reasons" for abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. medical reasons are less than 10%
there are dozens of polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. As any lawyer will tell you -
and am not one - don't ask a question unless you are prepared for an answer.

Several years ago there was a discussion on "House" message board, where a teen had an abortion. She was in NJ, I think, and did not need parental consent. And this led to a heated discussion on that board when one woman had no problem with a woman dying in back ally abortion, "to send a message."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why don't they try self-immolation or hunger strikes to end what they call "murder"?
Why put someone else in harm's way? Oh yeah. They're pro-forced birth except for them or their wives and daughters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. For the woman I would favor
education in sexual responsibility, and community service working with children; for the doctor I would advocate revoking his/her license to practice medicine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Is this sarcasm? You really advocate punishing women who want/need abortions?
And revoking the licenses of any doctors who perform them??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I've always wondered some things about laws/enforcement pre-R v. W:
What happened before Roe???? :shrug: Did the women who got abortions go to jail? Or just the doctors? How strictly were anti-abortion laws enforced? Were they on the books but only rarely enforced? Any links to resources?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'd ask, but they weren't hanging out in front of Planned Parenthood today...
The anti-abortionists have been there everyday for many months now, but not today.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aka-chmeee Donating Member (188 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-01-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why not extend this logic further?
Using the "reasoning" of the pro-birth people, should there not be a coroner's inquest in the case of every miscarriage to determine if the woman should be charged with negligent homicide at the very least?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC