|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
| CatWoman
|
Fri May-22-09 08:05 PM Original message |
| Oh Mary Kay. Really Now. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
dsc
|
Fri May-22-09 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. try to imagine for say 30 seconds |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CatWoman
|
Fri May-22-09 08:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. you're absolutely right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| slackmaster
|
Sun May-24-09 04:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 43. Truer words were never written on DU |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:30 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 54. He would go to jail for 7 years and then all would be well. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
|
Fri May-22-09 08:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Does she have to register as a sex offender? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
|
Fri May-22-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. I believe that their children are not in their custody |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri May-22-09 08:30 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. If you knew anything about her own daddy, you'd probably feel at least a glimmer of |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dorkulon
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri May-22-09 08:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. What about her dad? Never heard anything about that. /nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
|
Sun May-24-09 10:50 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 27. Her dad was kicked out of the John Birch Society for racism and extremism. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Liberal_in_LA
|
Sun May-24-09 12:05 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 34. And Bob Dornan turned out to be a real nut also. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FloridaJudy
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun May-24-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 45. Jaysus. How nuts do you have to be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostinVA
|
Sun May-24-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 47. Her mother was also an "anti-feminist activist" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
|
Fri May-22-09 08:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 11. She did not have a very decent childhood. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
|
Sun May-24-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 39. And her husband, frankly, was not the nicest person in the world |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
|
Sun May-24-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 42. Our society has a lot of voyeurism in it. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostinVA
|
Sun May-24-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 48. Agreed -- defintely not the "St. Stephen" the media made him out to be |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 59. Neither lawful, nor excusable. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
|
Fri May-22-09 08:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 12. RW Orange County CA congressman who had... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
|
Fri May-22-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 16. I do |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
|
Fri May-22-09 11:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 18. A little even-handedness is all I'm asking |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
|
Sat May-23-09 02:52 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 20. She's female and attractive. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
|
Sat May-23-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 21. Surely that couldn't be a factor?!? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
|
Sat May-23-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 22. I think the "thought" process goes like this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
|
Sat May-23-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 23. Are you sure you're not a dude? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
|
Sat May-23-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. :pulls waistband out a bit and peeks: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh
|
Mon May-25-09 12:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 53. Nope |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| quiller4
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun May-24-09 11:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 30. That was true while she was incarcerated. They have had |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JSK
(918 posts)
|
Sun May-24-09 12:07 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 35. Didn't her ex and the kids move to Alaska? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mitchum
|
Sun May-24-09 12:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 38. Ex: "What does he have that I don't have?" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mike 03
|
Fri May-22-09 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Kick and Rec. Shocking. You also put things into perspective in a way I had not |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
|
Fri May-22-09 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Cool. It could be a franchise. How bout "Hot For Cellmate" | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri May-22-09 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. anybody read the comments? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
|
Fri May-22-09 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Gag me... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri May-22-09 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. am I cracked, or does he look to be gaining on her, age-wise? in about five years, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| demodonkey
|
Sat May-23-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 26. He looks older than she does NOW, IMHO. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Liberal_in_LA
|
Sun May-24-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 33. I recall her saying that she 1st noticed him when he was 8 or some outrageously young age |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
|
Fri May-22-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. This will forever be the finest true life example of chutzpah. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus
|
Fri May-22-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. This isn't the Mary Kay I was expecting. OY |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri May-22-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 17. Me either.. was expecting the commandos in the Pink Cadillac's.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughBeaumont
|
Sat May-23-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 24. Pink Uzis, too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Baby Snooks
|
Sun May-24-09 02:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 41. The real Pink Ladies... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23
|
Sun May-24-09 11:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 52. Oh my God! I LOVED that book! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
|
Sat May-23-09 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. Ay caramba, Mary Kay. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
|
Sun May-24-09 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
| 28. What Do You Want From Them? Seriously. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
|
Sun May-24-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 40. No, it won't. People will never leave them alone |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
|
Sun May-24-09 10:51 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 49. Leave them alone???? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
|
Mon May-25-09 04:50 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 55. Yes, they are. And it wouldn't have been a problem had LeTourneau had the fucking sense-- | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
|
Mon May-25-09 07:07 AM Response to Reply #55 |
| 56. Nice Story. Too Bad It's Inaccurate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
|
Mon May-25-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 57. She had to have been 16,which would have made it legal | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
|
Tue May-26-09 11:38 AM Response to Reply #57 |
| 61. And Would Have Been 15 When They Met |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 11:15 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 58. would you be ok with a teacher having sex with your child? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 11:27 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 60. Yeah. You said that before. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano
|
Sun May-24-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 46. I guess I want them to live happily ever after without exploiting a criminal past for profit. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas
|
Tue May-26-09 11:40 AM Response to Reply #46 |
| 63. In Other Words, They Should Be Social Outcasts Working at Wal-Mart |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
|
Sun May-24-09 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 29. She seems cosmetic. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| elizfeelinggreat
|
Sun May-24-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
| 31. blech! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| davsand
|
Sun May-24-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 32. Has anyone heard what date they scheduled for the Roman Polanski party? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
|
Sun May-24-09 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. (shrug) If they're happy, good 'nuff for me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mitchum
|
Sun May-24-09 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. Deceptive advertising....she is not hot |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toucano
|
Sun May-24-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 44. It says nothing about her being hot. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
|
Sun May-24-09 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. sick |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| applegrove
|
Sun May-24-09 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 51. She's such a sicko. Her poor former family. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
|
Tue May-26-09 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 62. I can't believe he never moved on |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| dysfunctional press
|
Tue May-26-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 64. or... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Feb 10th 2010, 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC