helderheid

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Apr-03-07 03:17 PM
Original message

Let's Ban DRE Voting Machines --- ACTION

Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 03:20 PM by helderheid

"The distinction between 'political' and 'performance-related'...is, in my view, largely artificial."
-- Kyle Sampson, asst. to Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez

Absolute power corrupts absolutely. The above opinion, relating to the Justice Department firings scandal, has corrupted U.S. elections.

“Political” victory and “performance-related” voting machines have become lethally mixed in the Direct Record Electronic voting machine (DRE.)

DRE victories are electronic. Even with a paper trail, DRE results are impossible to verify for accuracy and transparency.

HR 811, Congressman Rush Holt's Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2007, must be amended to ban the Direct Record Electronic (DRE) voting machine.

DRE ballots are electronic, not paper. Their electronic tally of electronic ballots is official, without check or balance, in 90% of DRE elections – even with a paper trail. Without amendment, HR 811 perpetuates this situation.

Many well-meaning legislators support HR 811 because they believe its "voter-verified permanent paper ballot" means that from now on, Americans will be voting on paper for security and accuracy. They are mistaken.

In HR 811, the DRE "voter-verified permanent paper ballot" is a paper audit trail. It will be used to check less than 10% of the vote. And studies show that many DRE voters forget or neglect to verify the paper trail.

An election in Orange County, CA was recently overturned in a recount. Absentee ballots were scrutinized for voter intent. Marks on those paper ballots convinced the Registrar in ten cases that the votes had been counted wrong, and the outcome flipped. The DRE paper trail was never used; the DRE votes were recounted electronically.

Despite California's paper-trail law for DRE audits, a manual recount of the paper trail was deemed too expensive and difficult, so the judge approved the electronic recount. Congressman Holt maintains that his bill would not have allowed this, but Californians thought the same thing when we passed our paper-trail law. Americans must eliminate this situation altogether by banning electric ballots.

DREs can target neighborhoods for electronic disenfranchisement. Dolores Huerta brought that message recently to Capitol Hill, bearing a study from New Mexico that showed undervote rates soaring when Native Americans and Spanish-language voters used DREs. Rates were similar to that in Anglo communities when New Mexicans went to all-opti-scanned paper ballots.

DREs, touted as necessary for special-needs voters, are as insecure for those voters' intent as for others. Touch-screen computers that do not tabulate but assist voters with disabilities and language needs to mark their ballots can restore security to those voters as they improve accessibility.

TELL YOUR CONGRESS MEMBER TODAY: BAN THE DRE!

Members of Congress are home on recess now; call their district offices so they'll know they can’t leave this problem inside the DC bubble. As Speaker Pelosi recently said: “Elections have consequences."

Sincerely,

Mimi Kennedy
PDA Board Chair

Progressive Democrats of America is a grassroots PAC that works both inside the Democratic Party and outside in movements for peace and justice. Our goal: Extend the victory of Nov. 2006 into a permanent, progressive majority. PDA’s advisory board includes six members of Congress and activist leaders such as Tom Hayden, Cindy Sheehan, Medea Benjamin and Rev. Lennox Yearwood. More info: http://pdamerica.org/.