Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who do you predict will be the Republic nominee in '08?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:02 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who do you predict will be the Republic nominee in '08?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh please dear Goddess, let it be Katherine Harris !
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Giuliani/Thompson (either of them) would be a strong ticket.
From the perspective of the Republicans. Moderate/Conservative. Bring in the (somewhat) sane elements and mollify their right wing.

Tough call at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ghoul-iani with 3 wives & the 911 heroes' cough? I don't think so. DOA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. The Skeletons in Gouliani's Closet Don't Matter, Since the Repiglican Media Will Never Mention Them
They all LOVE Gouliani.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I agree. I guess you probably mean Fred Thompson not Tommy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fred Thompson and I am mildly concerned
Edited on Mon Apr-02-07 04:09 PM by Perky
He has a modicum of gravitas and has a presidential swagger.

Dobson howwever is pushing Newt and said apparently tha Thompson was not even a Christian...Wow.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/2007/03/dr_dobson_explains_decision_to.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. He also looks a little like Kelsey Grammer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Thompson will do very well for many reasons
one, he is a D list hack of an actor, a relative nobody, just like Reagan.

two, he has a fatherly/grandfatherly way about his persona (how the media will protray him), and Republicans crave that in a candidate. They want a daddy.

three, he says all the right things. He is touted as an "old school" conservative (like that were any kind of virtue) and may manage to convice voters that he is honest and full of dignity and class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Mildly?
He scares the entire ass off me. As a candidate in the TV age, he will stomp the terra like a brontosaurus. He has no cash, and has no fundraising infrastructure, but can change that with one good day of interviews. Good Morning America to Tweety to Tucker to Wolf to King, one day of the voice and the act, and he will have at least enough cash to survive until 2/5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. He is formidable but
Dobson said basically he was not Christian enough and apperars to be backing Newt. If that rhetoric gets racheted up.... I don't think he will have any great momentum in the south during the later primaries.

He migth raise money but you and I both know that its not about money in Iowa and New Hampshire. It is about boots on the grounf, organization and the locals you have lined up. The problem is that most of the local political leadership in both states is already ib bed with another candidate. And if you do not beat expectations in those two states mokney for 2/5 will not help. Its all going to be about TV ads and no real debates in front of the locals.

Now I readidly admit that he has a great persona and could come up with great ad material. But the 20+ states lining up for 2/5 are going to be tsunamies wuth ads abd I don't know if it help if you do not have som mo' goin in.

He would have to win South Caroline handidly to have a shot.

But it is entirely possible that they emerge after 2/5 with no clear front runner due to geographic issues and that might be his best hope given a late entry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. they keep dropping like flies---multiple marriages & statements like McCain's jewel: Baghdad is safe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. You mean Fred and Tommy Thompson are not the same person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. They Might Be Dumb Enough to Run F. Thompson, but I think it will end up Newt
The Christian Right as a voting block will have deserted them so I think it will be the 'intellectual' side of the party that comes out next time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. My Predictions
Either the great Darrell ASSI..errr I mean Issa....who asks great questions at Chairman Waxmans hearings.......




OR............John Mica the great Congressman from Florida, who always rants and 'whines' during Chairman Waxman's hearings........


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Newt Gingrich, Sir
And great fun will be had by all as the Democratic Party's nominee buries him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I gotta find the post I made a year ago...I said then that Newt was running
and would be formidable for the nomination at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
36. found it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. That WILL be fun. Please forgive me -- that sound you're hearing is
me licking my chops.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Going out on a limb, Romney/Bush...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lutefisk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. It will be the person who replaces Cheney, imho
I still think that could well be Rice or Jeb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Poll aside
I know exactly who will get the Republic nomination, it's gonna be.....ready for it....the same one that will loose the 08 Presidential Election. How's that for a prediction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Fred Thompson. They are going nuts over him at FR. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thompson or Giuliani
If it's Giuliani, the ticket will be Rudy Giuliani // Haley Barbour (governor of Mississippi).

If it's Thompson, the ticket will be Fred Thompson // Tim Pawlenty (governor of Minnesota).

Either would be strong; Thompson would be a much more traditional Left vs. Right election face-off, with red states and blue states largely going the same way they did in the last 2 elections. Giuliani, especially against John Edwards but even, to a lesser extent, against Obama or Hillary Clinton, would give us a much more nontraditional campaign, with Democrats likely being much more competitive in the South and Midwest but Republicans more competitive in places like Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, NY, and Connecticut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. I agree with # 14 (herbster)
Whoever replaces Cheney when he resigns/dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. Old Jebbie will come out of nowhere when the repugs are fight among themselves and Jeb
Edited on Mon Apr-02-07 05:56 PM by LaPera
will be the only one the BushCo Fascist can trust & control, to maintain the Bush family criminal enterprise called the USA.

Bush & the family of hardcore neocon fascist can't trust anyone else except family, to continue the total fascist control of the kings throne/executive branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sam Brownback. It's a jammed field and early GOP primary voters
will split into several camps rather than rallying behind say, McCain or Romney.

It opens the Iowa caucuses for a well-organized far-right surge by someone like Brownback.

I think Huckabee is out by summertime, if not before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yes yes, McCain is a little post shark-hurdle. But no one else has the mojo.
Fred will fall apart. Watch it. I think he'll appeal first to people who would rather have Rudy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PhilipShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Other: George Pataki or Jeb Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Gravitas trumps Governores in 'o8
Igenerally believe that governors are for mor electable then senatores and history bears that out.. but this election is about going to nbe about who has the smarts for the jobs after 8 years of the idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Didn't Pataki already suspend his campaign?
They won't do Jeb. They're arrogant, not stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
27. Right now I'd say Fred Thompson
He's a Reagan/Bush clone. Like Reagan, he has just enough acting ability to look and sound like strong presidential material, yet with that down-home "I can drink a beer with that guy" charm. Naive Americans will eat it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
28. If Fred Thompson gets in, he'll win in a walk
Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 06:13 AM by WilliamPitt
The nomination, I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Hmmm, I think you underestimate Republican smear skills.
This could be a "Oh please, let them nominate that old Gipper dude" moment, but Thompson strikes me as a lightweight. It's true there's a ecological niche not being filled on the Republican side. But I'm not so sure Thompson hasn't got a skel or two that could make his star fade mighty quickly.

This observation, of course, comes from the same infallible instincts that told me to support Dukakis, so take a grain of salt with any predictions from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. You may be right,
Edited on Tue Apr-03-07 07:25 AM by WilliamPitt
but I've been watching him for several months now, waiting for his hat to float into the ring. I fear that hat.

Think on the current front-runner GOP nominees.

Giuliani, as far as the base is concerned, might as well be some Northeast hippie abortion doctor who wants to take all the guns in America and shoot them into space. Anti-choice Evangelicals and NRA Republicans are most of the GOP base, Rudy isn't their man, and that 9/11 hero stuff won't buy him out of that doghouse.

Romney is a member of some evil voodoo quasi-Satanic cult, according to the religious metrics of the GOP base (whose devotion to an insane, bloodthirsty, bastardized version of Christianity defines "cult"), and is thus unacceptable.

The base remembers McCain from South Carolina in 2000, some of them helped to chop him down in that astonishingly vicious primary, and his newly-discovered passion for all things Bush won't make them forget how much they hated him...plus, he sponsored a campaign finance reform bill, which threatened their clout.

I could go on, but you get the point. No national-candidate Republican wins anything without the energetic support of the party base (God and guns, to be blunt), which is why Bush courted them for years in Texas, which is why McCain is peddling his ass to every Evangelical leader he can find.

Whichever one of these nabobs secures the nomination will be supported, with varying degrees of disgust, by the base...because the alternative is Satan-Clinton selling the entire US Navy to Iran for some good opium and a case of cold Newcastles. They'll support the nominee, maybe, sorta.

I think Thompson has that extra something the GOP base might flock to. The deep voice, a sense of timing before a crowd that trained actors have like an instinct, the tough-guy no-nonsense image his TV and movie roles have weaved around him...

...and maybe, in the end, my worries come down to this: the GOP base exists within a carefully constructed, hermetically sealed fantasy world. You know, the world where liberals and terrorists are trying to destroy Christmas, but only when they're not destroying Easter, because Christianity itself is under assault in America, because Fox News says so, and by the way, they found WMD in Iraq and the Founding Fathers were hardcore Baptists, lather, rinse, repeat...

Fred Thompson was a Senator, yes, but he is mostly a product of film fantasy, and tough-guy film fantasy at that, whose roles have included the CIA chief, an Admiral, a DA, all in popular films and TV shows. I think the base would flock to him like ducks to water. They've seen him on TV and movie screens playing the righteous American leader...and they all bought the same bag of hooey from an actor-turned-California-governor not quite 30 years ago, bought it with such vigor that 'Reagan' is on armchair-to-armchair relations with Jesus, in their opinion.

Thompson will bag the base, and a lot of other GOPers, with one good day of TV interviews. One day, and the whole GOP race will change. Just a hunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
32. No idea.
just look at self-perceived front runners from 16 months ago - and how they are nowhere in sight: Frist, Allen, Santorum... or how poorly McCain is doing. The GOP nomination, at this moment, is wide open. Very hard to predict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
33. I won't SEEM like hypocracy to most Republicans
to nominate Guiliani with his two divorces and other assorted baggage because Republicans cannot be hypocrites in their own eyes. They will not see that connection AT ALL and even if the media won't be quiet about it, they can always delude themselves with Sean Hannity and the other liars. Rudy will get down to the real business of the GOP - sending our soldiers to the Middle East and sending the jobs to Asia. There's more than enough stupid fools that really think Iraq was a grand idea and Iran is an even better idea to nominate Rudy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwlauren35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
37. I can see Gilmore or Hagel.
McCain will implode, Guiliani will implode, Romney's Mormonism AND being in a pro-gay marriage state will ultimately defeat him.

Its possible that Huckabee or Brownback (sp?) are possibilities. But there are too many Pubs who don't like or trust McCain, too many who are going to despise Guiliani for his "lack of moral fiber" and too many will be uncomfortable with Romney being from Massachusetts.

My one thought about McCain is that he may have the "party nod", similar to Kerry, i.e. "it's his turn" and the party will support him no matter what. Not sure what that might do to the elections, if we put up a "non-controversial" candidate.

The pubs might just stay at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
38. some scumbag
really doesn't matter, they're all the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
39. another Hollywood actor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
40. If Fred makes a decision soon...
...I think he'd be strong enough to get nomination in a walk.

If not FDT, Giuliani is probably next, followed by McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-03-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
41. I doubt it will be Hagel
That would imply a certain amount of common sense in the hierarchy
of the Republican party--the only nominee they could have that knows
how to appear normal without actually being an actor. He's far right
but has enough sense to appear reasonable when the occasion warrants,
which is dangerous enough to us, but makes the radical right scream
in protest, even when Hagel would be their ideal stealth candidate.
He could sneak in just like Bush under the guise of moderation, only
to wreak his havoc once installed. Hagel is dangerous because he
is so good at playing what he is not to so many. Thompson is dangerous
because he not only puts his cards on the table, but also has lousy
cards and can convince people that he has a winning hand anyway.

I can see them running to Thompson simply because so many of them are
so susceptible to being taken in by an act, and who better to do an act
than a professional actor? But McCain and Giuliani will fight tooth and
nail for the sole reason that neither of them will say they have come this
far just to bow out in favor of an undeclared actor. They'll both kiss his
feet if he's the nominee, but they'll wage thermonuclear war to prevent his
becoming the nominee.

McCain and Giuliani have a LOT of damage control to do before they get the
nomination, but, like Hillary, they have time and money, and it's too early
to count either of them out altogether. I, for one, would predict that the right
wing nominee will be neither of them, if I HAD to make the prediction now. But
I still maintain that making such a prediction at this point for either party
is a waste of time. There is an ocean of water to flow under the proverbial
bridge before the primaries, and it will flow at its own pace no matter how
many of us wish it to flow at a faster pace. Why not wait it out, and save
ourselves the stress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC