Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid's Specter deal stirs senior Dems' anger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 05:55 PM
Original message
Reid's Specter deal stirs senior Dems' anger
Reid's Specter deal stirs senior Dems' anger
By Alexander Bolton
Posted: 04/29/09 01:22 PM


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) deal to allow Sen. Arlen Specter to retain his seniority after he switches to the Democratic Conference has not been received well by senior senators in the party.

Several Democrats are furious with Reid for agreeing to let Specter (Pa.) keep the seniority accrued over more than 28 years as a Republican senator. That could allow him to leap past senior Democrats on powerful panels — including the Appropriations and Judiciary committees.

"I won't be happy if I don't get to chair something because of Arlen Specter," said Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), who sits on the Appropriations Committee with Specter and is fifth in seniority among Democrats behind Chairman Daniel Inouye (Hawaii), Sens. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), Patrick Leahy (Vt.) and Tom Harkin (Iowa). "I'm happy with the Democratic order but I don't want to be displaced because of Arlen Specter," she said.

One senior Democratic lawmaker told The Hill that the Democratic Conference will vote against giving the longtime Pennsylvania Republican seniority over lawmakers like Harkin, Mikulski and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) when they hold their organizational meeting after the 2010 election.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democrats-push-back-on-specter-deal-2009-04-29.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another screwup by Reid
We've gotta be up in triple digits by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reid never misses a chance to screw the dems
or so it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reid is such a fuck-up.
Edited on Wed Apr-29-09 05:58 PM by blueclown
We are in serious need of a legitimate Democratic challenger in the primary next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Are they mad enough to DUMP REID yet?
Because I pretty much am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe NOW they'll replace Dickless Harry. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good -- this 'puke in disguise deserves nothing
If old Arlen thought jumping ship was going to buy him anything, he is sadly mistaken. This is fun for us to watch the 'puke heads explode over Specter's "abandoning the party" but he deserves NOTHING from the Dems and sure as hell should NOT -- I repeat NOT -- get seniority over any Dem in committee assignments, etc. Can't we get rid of Harry Reid? Useless POS. "Majority Leader" my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ismell the beginning of a rebellion. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. How long will Specter realistically stay in the Senate?
I have the feeling that he wants to win again and leave on his own terms. With a Dem governor it would keep the seat as a Dem spot.

I know this all sounds cold. But he's in his late 70s and has been so ill. So I truly think he just wants to do this to thumb his nose at the Republicans and exit "his way".

I'm not thrilled that he's a Dem now. I haven't trusted him in a long time. I've flip flopped on his switch since yesterday and have settled on very mixed feelings. I just hope Obama knows what he's doing and that Specter finds some humility real fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. just more proof that Sphincter isnt a Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. How is Harry Reid majority leader anyhow? He was minority leader when
nobody wanted it?

What is that idiot's charm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Would Specter chair a committee or sub-committee that is to investigate Cheney/Bush malfeasance?
"Since Reid and Specter announced their deal, Senate insiders have speculated that Specter could bump Harkin from his chairmanship of the powerful Labor, Health and Human Services Appropriations Subcommittee or return to be chairman of Judiciary if the current chairman, Leahy, takes over the gavel at Appropriations. Specter was chairman of Judiciary in the 109th Congress when Republicans controlled the chamber and ushered through the confirmations of Supreme Court Justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Now there's a great question. I don't know, but will try to find out.
Hi, Uncle Joe!

And I'd HATE to see Leahy leave the Judiciary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. It is a damn trick and Spector is a mole saving his own arse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC