|
Edited on Sat Apr-18-09 02:38 PM by The Traveler
(paraphrasing here) "Is it possible that your secret service" ... I forget the name of the organization ... "had a role in the assassination President John Kennedy?"
According to the interviewer, Castro was silent for a moment and then said something I found striking in its honesty. It went something like this. "I don't know. That's the problem with secret agencies ... you never know if you are aware of everything they do."
It is a problem that even the autocratic Fidel Castro recognized, way back in the sixties. Covert operations are a double edged sword. One the one hand, they are very cost effective in terms of achieving goals at lowered human costs. (Spies and assassins are more precise than shock and awe style saturation bombing raids. At some point we have got to start realizing that an Air Force fighter is an unacceptably clumsy weapon for nailing one or two bad guys. You can get the bad guys that way but it leaves behind a scorched neighborhood as "collateral damage". Put yourself in the position of one of the locals. You might not like the asshole living next to you, but you would be mightily pissed at the people who bombed his house from the air and left yours to burn in the aftermath. For some things, a covert operative with a high powered rifle really is a much better option.)
On the other hand, they of necessity operate with little direct oversight and can run open loop, without government control, for quite a while before that is detected, which is the exactly the danger Castro so clearly articulated.
It is always worse when intelligence functions are influenced by excessive political pressure. I imagine that, over the past eight years, the careers of the bad actors advanced more quickly than those who were more ethical and mindful of their duties. That guarantees an agency whose objectives will come into tension with a foreign policy that does not share their "I am a hammer ... everyone else is a nail" philosophy.
So there has to be house cleaning, at the very least, and doing that will definitely damage American intelligence capabilities for a period of time. It is proper and necessary to conduct that house cleaning in a measured, deliberate, and desperately fair fashion. But there is no avoiding it. The alternative poses unacceptable risks to civilian control of military and intelligence apparatus.
And in the final analysis, the "I was just following orders" defense just plain ain't good enough.
Trav
|