Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contracts are sacred: Taxpayers MUST bail out the Somali pirates!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 10:07 AM
Original message
Contracts are sacred: Taxpayers MUST bail out the Somali pirates!
The banksters who suddenly discovered the sanctity of agreements (amid the mountains of their own frauds) had no contracts with the government! They made contracts with each other, for whatever fictional values they felt like specifying.

For example:

Purchaser of credit-default swap from AIG: "I say this piece of toxic shit I'm betting against (which I don't even own) is worth a billion dollars. The ratings agency agrees, they rated it AAA. So if it fails you'll pay me a billion, right?"

AIG Guy in London (Who Today No Longer Recalls This Conversation): "I'll agree, even though I don't have enough billions to pay you and the many others making the same bet. But I like your premiums! Even more than that, I like the outrageous bonuses I get for landing more premiums! Apres moi, le deluge!"

Thus Is the Holy Contract Sealed!

And then, when the piece of toxic shit fails, the US government steps in to "honor" the contract that the banksters made up out of their own fantasy. The taxpayer dollars are paid literally in exchange for fiction. Not bad, eh? Who hasn't wished they could just write any number they fancy and have it turn into real cash?

MEANWHILE, IN SOMALIA:

PIRATE 1 (Hijacker): "If this mission fails, I'll be losing a billion dollars in potential booty and ransom! -- Actually, I just pulled that figure out of my ass and sprinkled some fancy-sounding formulas on it. But it sounds like a great number to have!"

Pirate 2 (Hijack Insurer): "In exchange for your monthly premium, I hereby agree by contract to cover the sum of your potential loss for you. That is, in case, by some impossible quirk of fate, your mission should fail. Which is impossible, because everyone knows the iron law of economics: Oil tankers get bigger and easier to hijack every year! They've never gotten smaller! -- And while I'm at it, my good friend -- thanks for the kickback, by the way -- do you have any friends of yours who want to bet against your mission too? They don't actually have to be IN the mission, they only have to pay the premium, and I'll promise to cover them as well! It's a CONTRACT!"

Gasp! The mission -- to hijack a big ship that happened to be a Pentagon decoy full of special forces -- FAILS! Life is so unfair! No one could have foreseen this! It's a BLACK SWAN (tm)!

But wait, think of the chain reaction, if the Hijack Insurer should fail. All the hijackers will end up out of business! This cannot be allowed.

We need the government to step in and HONOR THAT CONTRACT!

---

Unfortunately for the Somalis, the last part does not apply to them. The problem is, they DIDN'T STEAL ENOUGH. If only they had stolen, say, 10 percent of the world, and if they had given .00001 percent of that to politicians in bribes and "campaign contributions," then the government would have given them the trillions they needed to purchase the rest of the world at depressed prices.

Clearly, it was a failure of imagination on their part to steal just a few ships. They should have read more Milton Friedman. (Like the great genius Larry Summers, who is the most indispensable and important person in the world, life is simply unimaginable without his counsel).

Tha-at's all folks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. bumparella!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bump II!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. bump iii
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. bump iv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC