Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Is Frank Gaffney On The TV?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 08:00 AM
Original message
Why Is Frank Gaffney On The TV?
Edited on Tue Apr-07-09 08:02 AM by babylonsister
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_04/017634.php

WHY IS FRANK GAFFNEY ON THE TV?.... I care less about strange people believing strange things, and more about major news networks giving strange people a national platform to say strange things.

{Yesterday} on MSNBC, right-wing commentator Frank Gaffney joined in, boldly declaring, "I'm a member of Dick Cheney's fan club," alluding to the former vice president's comments that Obama is making Americans less safe. Gaffney said that today, for example, Obama told our "Muslim enemies" that the United States is "willing to submit to them."

When asked by MSNBC host David Shuster and Mother Jones's David Corn for proof of this supposed submission, Gaffney pointed to a secret "code" Obama is using -- which apparently only he, al Qaeda, the Saudis, and the Taliban understand.


With a straight face, Gaffney insisted that when the president uses the word "respect," it's "code for those who adhere to Sharia that we will submit to Sharia." He added, "I'm telling you the code as they receive it in the Taliban headquarters and in al Qaeda's cave and in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. They perceive this as submission."

Now, this is obviously ridiculous. But the concern here isn't that Frank Gaffney says crazy things to national television audiences; it's that Frank Gaffney was invited to says crazy things to a national television audience.

Gaffney was on MSNBC a couple of weeks ago, for example, arguing that "evidence" exists connecting Saddam Hussein to 9/11, the 1993 attack on the World Trade Center, and the Oklahoma City bombing. In September, Gaffney argued that Sarah Palin has learned foreign policy through "osmosis," by living in Alaska. He's argued that U.S. forces really did find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but the media covered it up. He's used made-up quotes and recommended "hanging" Democratic officials critical of the Bush administration's Iraq policy. Steve M. reminds me that Gaffney also believes there's "evidence" suggesting the president is not a natural born citizen of the United States, and once recommended a military strike on Al Jazeera headquarters.

Gaffney is certainly entitled to believe obvious nonsense, but I'll ask the same question I posed the last time I saw Gaffney on MSNBC: is there nothing these guys can say that would force them from polite company? Just how crazy must a conservative be before he/she is no longer invited back onto national television to share ridiculous ideas?

-Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. For the same reason Cheney and Cliff May are showing up again...
to keep the neocon on life support until they can find political backing to propel them into power again. They liked the full frontal power that * gave them and they want it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irish.lambchop Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. I saw that segment. Twice.
And still couldn't believe a giant hook didn't drag him off set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. The right needs to defend Cheney. He's tied to so much of their history.
Discredit Cheney and Ronnie's legacy comes into question. The gop leadership can't have the rank and file wondering if they've all been bamboozled for 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sure, I 'get' that. But if Gaffney is the r/w's mouthpiece for defending
Cheney and they can't find anyone more credible, they are in worse shape than I thought. This guy is certifiable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lazy Producers...
The beltway is a bubbleworld...a small culture where politicians, mediatypes and the "hangers on" know they have a big microphone and don't hesitate to run for it whenever they can.

Many of these shows have producers who do the real legwork...the booking. The "goal" is to try to "balance" shows and thus these people go to "the book" or their "roldex" for an "expert" or alternative perspective. In many cases this means a call to a "think tank"...and that's where the Gaffneys of the world live. By the fact they are employed at a "think tank" it's assumed they are an "expert" (rather than a paid-for toadie of some hidden fat cat). And these people are persistant. If the producers don't call them, they call the producers or approach them at the drinkie-drinkie parties...or their bosses.

Sis...many times I watch these shows it's like walking into a high school cafeteria...the same kids sitting at the same tables, passing notes, spreading gossip and picking fights.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Makes sense, Kharma Train. Too bad they can't think outside the box.
I guess that's where the likes of Pat Buchanan comes from, too. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. i can only assume that the media is propping up the neocons after their humiliating defeat in novemb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC