Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bailout Bonus Is A Wedge Issue.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:04 PM
Original message
The Bailout Bonus Is A Wedge Issue.
The current feigned poutrage across the airwaves from repukes, talkers and Democrats is just another wedge issue.

It is not the fault of President Obama, or Giethner, or Dodd, or Summers. It is the fault of the greedy fat cats who are so insulated in their bubble worlds, that they are incapable or relating to or empathizing with us in the lowly working/poverty class. If they had any understanding or any heart, they would have done the right thing. Not just with the bonuses, which I really don't give a shit about, but through their entire operations.

It is corporate greed that lead to this nose-diving economy, lead by deregulating by and for greed. It was greed that caused these giants to get "too-big-to-fail". And is is greed that blinds them to the real suffering going on across the country.

He said-she said fights over who allowed the greedy pigs make off with a fraction of the dough they have stolen over the last three decades is only to divide those of us on the bottom.

The issue is the Class War that we, the people are still losing. The greatest trick the Ruling Class pulls is to get us to fight amongst ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um, do you know what the phrase "wedge issue" *means*?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep, and I see splintering.
People are calling for Giethner and Summers to canned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. got to disagree with you there
our government had an obligation to adequately define the terms of the bailout including what was permissible and what needed to be tracked and reported....

they failed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. We knew that when it happened...
where was the 'outrage' then? I guess the tv didn't think it was 'outrageous' until Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. I didn't know it
Yes, I knew the legislation didn't have those details but
I couldn't imagine that the money was turned over without some type of contract being signed by the recipient and the government spelling out the terms of the agreement.

Its in that contract where those type of things are specified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That was known the moment..
Paulson asked for it. He didn't have to say where the money was going, and the receivers did not have to say what they were doing with it. But of course, that was way back before January 20th, 2009, when it really didn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Back in November they had multi million
dollar contracts with law firms to execute the TARP funds.
If you have multi million dollar contracts with law firms, someone is writing contracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. complete fail-those politicians are obviously and deeply in bed with the bank crooks
but yes cat fights over crumbs, when the real crime occurring now is the billions upon billions being distributed by geitner and company with no oversight, are merely a distraction. Sorry without the enabling politicians things might be different. Those billions could go to health centers or education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I agree, complicit politicians are in bed with the greedy crooks.
This mess is a result of decades of deregulation, and excess greed at the expense of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Repukes are trying to make the President use all his political capital on these bonuses so that
he'll have very little of it to push his progressive budget agenda and health/education reform through Congress.

They'll help yank back the $165 million, and pay it back to AIG in multiples on the back end in a few years, while helping to damage President Obama in the polls.

Notice how the RW is blaming President Obama for everything all the way back to Jan 2008; for not having the foresight and fighting to include bonus restrictions in the TARP when he was a Senator?

This will save the Repukes and their lobbying friends hundreds of billons in costs to reform health care and education.

Congress is now taking time out to focus on $165 million instead of the several trillion required to overhaul health care and education.

This will also help make the passage of a second stimulus (which has always been required) much more difficult, to the delight of the Repukes.

This is why they are playing along, feigning the support for the populist outrage. After all, it was the Repukes who were against any strict regulation of the TARP funds.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moundsview Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wedge issue?
It's a unity issue, the freepers are just as "outraged" as anyone. I don't think you grasp the term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. The frame being pushed by the RWers and the M$M is that the Dems
let this happen. It is an attempt to fracture the Democratic Party, with some starting to blame Geithnre and Summers. It's a wedge, that is the only reason the repukes are paying it any attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yup. That's clear.
Character assasination.

Poutrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. True, but if we ever decide to actually fight it, we will win and they know it.
The parasites are concerned. They know they cannot stand if we recognize what is really being done, but so far the distraction campaign is still working.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think it is a distraction
The millions are nothing compared to the billions they are stealing right in front of our faces.

And after all our work to end the wars, Obama gets elected as the anti-war candidate....everyone has forgotten and nothing has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Possumpoint Donating Member (937 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Red Herring
No one in the finance areas and government wants a close examination of the 170 billion dollars in bailout money given to AIG. Who and what did it go to? Why? It appears that many of the recipients were banks also receiving bailout money. Others were banks out side of the USA. Why should US taxpayer money be given to banks overseas? What adverse action to the USA would have occurred if we said no?

The bailouts are being used to make elites and fat cats whole when they should have been allowed to fail and fall into the shit they created. Yes, there may very well have been world wide hardship involved. Rebuilding on a sound financial footing and elimination of the debt based economy would be a great benefit.

This question of bonus money was raised as a misdirection campaign to avoid answering more important questions. If the 170 billion was a dollar the bonus money was less then a penny.

No more bailouts!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. It's no different than Reagan's Welfare Queens in Cadillacs
165 million in bonuses

170 billion

in bailouts since September

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29714402/

The AIG bonuses were revealed over the weekend. It also was disclosed that AIG used $90 billion-plus in federal aid to pay foreign and domestic banks, some of which had received their own multibillion-dollar U.S. government bailouts.

The recipients included Goldman Sachs, at $12.9 billion, and three European banks — France’s Societe Generale at $11.9 billion, Germany’s Deutsche Bank at $11.8 billion, and Britain’s Barclays PLC at $8.5 billion. Merrill Lynch, which also is undergoing federal scrutiny of its bonus plans and which is now part of Bank of America, had received $6.8 billion as of Dec. 31.

The money went to banks to cover their losses on complex mortgage investments, as well as for collateral needed for other transactions.



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/business/15AIG.html?hp

Word of the bonuses last week stirred such deep consternation inside the Obama administration that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told the firm they were unacceptable and demanded they be renegotiated, a senior administration official said. But the bonuses will go forward because lawyers said the firm was contractually obligated to pay them.

The payments to A.I.G.’s financial products unit are in addition to $121 million in previously scheduled bonuses for the company’s senior executives and 6,400 employees across the sprawling corporation. Mr. Geithner last week pressured A.I.G. to cut the $9.6 million going to the top 50 executives in half and tie the rest to performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC