Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Blue Dog Dem Confirms He’ll Vote Against Employee Free Choice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:01 AM
Original message
Another Blue Dog Dem Confirms He’ll Vote Against Employee Free Choice
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/labor/another-blue-dog-dem-confirms-hell-oppose-employee-free-choice/

Another Blue Dog Dem Confirms He’ll Vote Against Employee Free Choice


We already have Blue Dog Dem Dan Boren confirming on the record that he’ll vote against the Employee Free Choice Act.

And now we have a second. Mississippi Dem Rep. Travis Childers’ office just confirmed to me that he will vote against the measure, which is designed to make it easier for unions to organize and is far and away labor’s top priority.

Childers — also a Blue Dog — explained his thinking in a statement to his local paper:

“I plan to vote against the current card check bill. In these uncertain times, I’m very concerned that a wide range of small business leaders believe this will hurt job creation and economic development efforts in our region. There may be parts of the country where this measure will not have the same impact it will have here in north Mississippi, but my job is to put the 1st Congressional District first.”


Childers’ office confirms that he stands by the statement.

The rub here is that Childers, unlike Boren, didn’t vote against the measure in the last Congress, because he wasn’t in Congress at the time. Childers, in theory, was gettable for the pro-Employee Free Choice forces. So the optics of this one aren’t great for the pro-EFCA camp.

The labor side — SEIU in particular — has launched a tough campaign against Boren designed to make him pay a political price for his opposition. No response from the labor side yet on Childers, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not that worried about Congress. It's the Senate where it needs the votes. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC