Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Inquirer should not publish op-eds by war criminals (Or Any "Legit" News Source)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 05:10 PM
Original message
The Inquirer should not publish op-eds by war criminals (Or Any "Legit" News Source)
Monday, March 16, 2009
The Inquirer should not publish op-eds by war criminals

.......................

I -- and many others -- believe that Yoo's actions in the White House should be investigated by Congress and the Justice Department. That may happen, but for now he is still taken seriously as a constitutional expert and give all kinds of platforms to defend his views, that there was some kind of justification for the ideas that led to gross violations of law that took place at Gitmo, Abu Ghraib and elsewhere. The latest example: An op-ed by Yoo in this Sunday's Inquirer.

In the bad timing department, Yoo's op-ed was published on the same day that the New York Times published an op-ed chronicling some of the unlawful activity that was unleashed under the signature of John Yoo. You can read the graphic depiction of some of the torture techniques -- and before you say anything, I think the initial victims here are murdering thungs who deserve to burn in hell for all eternity for their own illegal acts plotted and carried out on 9/11.

But the whole point of fighting terrorism is maintaining a civil society, a society that's so much better than that. There's no evidence that torture produced any actionable intelligence that could not have been gained through legal means -- but it did recuit new terrorists to their cause in Iraq and elsewhere and sullied America's image among those who once admired us. For who? For what?

John Yoo has a right to free speech in this country. What that means is that he's allowed to walk down this street or stand up on a soapbox in Fairmount Park and spout his repulsive viewpoints -- and not get arrested. It doesn't mean that Yoo is entitled to powerful megaphones for those views, like the op-ed page of an American newspaper -- not if we're really serious about treating torture with the gravity it deserves. Yoo's megaphone should have been unplugged a long time.

more at:
http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/attytood/The_Inquirer_should_not_publish_op-eds_by_war_criminals.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC