Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: New DOJ Document Dump!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:35 PM
Original message
Breaking: New DOJ Document Dump!!!
The documents are here:

http://judiciary.house.gov/Printshop.aspx?Section=464

And here's a little background on the late document dump from TPM muckraker:

The Justice Department turned over yet more documents to Congress today -- documents which seem to show that Alberto Gonzales' chief of staff Kyle Sampson was responsible for misleading Congress about Karl Rove's role in replacing a U.S. attorney.


http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002898.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did Congress ask for these, or did the DOJ just decide to send them?.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalinNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. These "documents" just keep getting better everyday ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. no, this looks like a "kill the messenger strategy' since Sampson has agreed to talk.
In addition, I find that sending documents now, menas that documents were withheld from congress, doesn't it? Selectively sending the documents they want to has to be illegal. Congress asked for ALL documents. Unless, this was a reply to a new congressional request, it seems very suspicious to me...
Sampson will be testifying tomorrow. They send out documents incriminating him today/ Why not last week or the week before then? This looks to me like Gonzalez trying to bury Sampson, and with it Sampson's testimony...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Maybe. Hmmmm. ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. SNAP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. How did Sampson mislead congress--
he didn't even testify yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Apparently there was a list of questions that the DOJ answered
in writing and supposedly the material provided was false. Looks like they want Sampson to take the hit on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think
the emails show that he told the people who WERE testifying things that weren't true, which caused those people to testify falsely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Which in and of itself is illegal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Well they lit the fuse to
their own dynamite now. They would have only one purpose to do this, to try to blunt what they know is coming.

That's a smooth move Gonzalez, make him angry. Psstt, he's your chief of staff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. New Slogan: either sampson takes the fall, or he screws them to the wall
(with apologies to the late Johnnie Cochrane).

Seriously, since (I believe) there is evidence that Sampson knew about Rove's involvement, either Sampson admits that he directed that the letter deny Rove's involvement on his own initiative (he takes the fall) or he testifies that someone (big question...who) told him to make the change.

Gonna be interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. He'll Take The Fall For His Heroes
These VERMIN actually enjoy covering up for their superiors, a la Libby, and although he'll likely fight and do what he can to escape, in the end, he'll fall on the sword for KKKarl, etc.

And then in 20 months, he'll have that last minute pardon to look forward to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I don't think he'll cut his hair off for the delilahs
He's going before congress tomorrow - WILLINGLY...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. And that's the operative word.
If I were in the Justice Department right now I would be :hurts: my knickers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. MISSING. Where are the e-mail addresses. Full headers are needed.
The Committees need to request full headers for all documents, and the e-mail addreses used in all the emails. Copies without full headers are incomplete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Having worked for the DOJ in document handling
I can tell you this is typical behavior. Delay, delay, delay, then bury them under a flood of paper.

I should offer my services to congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. It's not only the DOJ that does this. I think it's SOP in most cases.
At least those that are big enough to matter. The burry them under mountains of paper is an old lawyer trick. You actually DO give the opposition everything they asked for, but there's SO much material,the damning evidence will most likely be missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. I would. Leahy posts his e-mail. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hertling writes in bold: "This message has been archived."
DOJ Document Set 4 Released on 3-28-2007
Page 5 of 43

Hertling writes in bold: "This message has been archived."

Now on Lou Dobbs saying it seems apparent "there were contradictions if not outright lies."

See this thread too:
Email-Gate FACTS: Felons, georgewbush.com, gwb43.com , et. al.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x523978

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Slightly early release. Think they're sitting on something bigger for Friday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. More documents? WOW!
I have a thread concerning the Ohio GOP, gwb43.com, georgewbush.com

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x469875
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC