Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1.4 mil. women should get MRI, not just mammogram

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:01 AM
Original message
1.4 mil. women should get MRI, not just mammogram
Edited on Wed Mar-28-07 10:03 AM by NNN0LHI
http://www.suntimes.com/lifestyles/health/316029,CST-NW...

March 28, 2007
BY MIKE STOBBE

ATLANTA -- Up to 1.4 million U.S. women -- those with a high risk of developing breast cancer -- should get annual MRIs as well as mammograms, the American Cancer Society says.

The cancer society's new guidelines are the first to recommend MRI for screening women who show no signs of cancer.

The guidelines are directed at symptomless women age 30 and older who have a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, those who were treated for Hodgkin's disease, or those with a strong family history of the disease, such as women with two or more close relatives who had breast or ovarian cancer or who have a close relative who developed breast cancer before age 50. snip

Doctors usually screen for breast cancer using mammography, an X-ray technique that can spot dense masses like tumors.

But MRI, or magnetic resonance imaging, makes more detailed images with a magnet and radio waves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, isn't that helpful. And who's paying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. good question
I wonder if insurance will pay for an MRI? If not - the cost is likely about $3,000 I bet! :mad:

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. that is still giving them money. The insurance company gets it's money from the insured
If 1.4 million people go do this, it will cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I went through a two year period with no health insurance
and unemployment in my early forties. Never saw a doctor during that time. Found out a year later that there was a free program in my state for an annual mammogram, but I never heard about it. Fortunately no health crises occurred. But the thing is, I was certainly looking for anything free- this was evidently available but there was no money to publicize it in any way so there were probably a lot of people who could have used it but never did.

A friend of mine died of ovarian cancer at age 42. She developed the symptoms during a long period without health insurance, and by the time she saw a doctor it was metastatic and she died two months later. She died of no health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. after all this time, now they are saying to have MRI !!!!
utter incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well I think mammograms are suitable for "certain" types of breasts
Problem is, not everyone has those types of breasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. no joke there
I am one of them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Scientific & Medical research continue
Something that was "state of the art" 20 years ago might not be the same today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 17th 2014, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC