Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

T2A: Did you know NC's constitution bars atheists from holding office?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:03 PM
Original message
T2A: Did you know NC's constitution bars atheists from holding office?
From Talk To Action...

Did you know NC's constitution bars atheists from holding office?
By Christian Dem in NC

When I found out that an Arkansas state rep is trying to repeal a provision in his state constitution that bars atheists from holding office, I remembered that, sadly, North Carolina's constitution has a similar provision.

Article 6, Section 8 says that anyone who "shall deny the being of Almighty God" can't hold office in the state. And here's another kicker--this provision was carried over verbatim from the 1868 Constitution even though SCOTUS threw out a similar provision in Maryland just 10 years before the current constitution was adopted.

To be sure, this provision has never been enforced since the adoption of our current constitution, since it would almost certainly be thrown out as a violation of the 1st and 14th Amendments (and possibly Article 6 as well). Still, to my mind the fact it's still there makes the state look backwoods.

...


http://www.talk2action.org/story/2009/2/24/172051/765
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I knew that one of the southern states did. Forgot it was NC.
I can't wait for some fundie to try to enforce that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes.
A 1961 SCOTUS decision overrules all the constitutional restrictions of the states (five states, I believe).

Good for the AR congress-critter, though. Leaving those clauses in the documents is unnecessarily provoking - kind of like leaving in miscegenation laws (Alabama was the last to remove their clause - in 2000!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC