Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP hates earmarks — except the ones its members sponsor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:06 PM
Original message
GOP hates earmarks — except the ones its members sponsor
GOP hates earmarks — except the ones its members sponsor

By David Lightman | McClatchy Newspapers


WASHINGTON — Republicans are expected to deliver a daylong rant Wednesday against Democratic spending legislation, yet the bill is loaded with thousands of pet projects that Republican lawmakers inserted.

Rep. Ralph Hall, R-Texas, included $142,500 for emergency repairs to the Sam Rayburn Library and Museum in Austin, Texas. Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., joined state colleagues to include $1.425 million for Nevada "statewide bus facilities." The top two Republicans on Congress' money committees also inserted local projects.

In all, an estimated $3.8 billion worth of specific projects, called "earmarks," are in the $410 billion spending bill that the House of Representatives is to vote on Wednesday. Easy passage is expected. The Senate is expected to act soon, too, since federal agencies will run out of money a week from Friday unless new funds are enacted.

House Democrats estimate that Republicans inserted 40 percent of the earmarks in the bill. An independent budget watchdog group, Taxpayers for Common Sense, said the 60-40 Democratic-Republican ratio followed historical patterns.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/62742.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's typical Republican philosophy:
Judge something based not on its merit, but on the party of its sponsor.

For that matter, if you told a Republican some ghastly story about a legislator who was accused of, say, molesting children, and told this Republican all about how the press was persecuting the legislator in the "court of public opinion", and all about how the legislator's spouse was defending the legislator while simultaneously cheating on him/her, and all about the emotional battering the legislator took as a child, and all about the sex addiction of the spouse... the Republican would WANT to make some kind of moral judgments, but would be completely unable to do so until you identified the party affiliation of the legislator. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't the President of the United States
say that he was going to put a break on the entire ear mark process. My understanding that this bill has 9000 ear mark items it it. Forty percent of earmarks are from Republican legislators. All that means is that sixty percent of the ear marks are from Democratic legislators. The whole system needs to be overhauled. Every line item of expenditure of the taxpayers money needs to be visible to the light of day and to all the American electorate. JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC