Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court rules Palin owes taxes on nights spent at home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:25 PM
Original message
Court rules Palin owes taxes on nights spent at home
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2009/02/18/ST2009021803325.html

Palin Now Owes Taxes on Payments for Nights at Home, State Rules

By James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 19, 2009; Page A04

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin (R) owes income taxes on nearly $17,000 paid to her as travel reimbursements when she spent nights in her Wasilla residence, according to a state legal opinion that the payments were not legitimate business expenses, a state official said yesterday.


During her first 19 months in office, Palin charged the state $16,951 in "per diem" allowances for spending 312 nights in her home. The allowances were intended to cover meals and incidental expenses while she was traveling on state business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. What. A. Crook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. So no repayment of the stolen per diem, just tax on it?
That makes so much sense. oye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yeah I don't get taht
She should have never gotten the per diem in the first place...but per diem isn't taxable income. At least it never has been when I've received it from the feds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. At least that's something. n/t
Edited on Wed Feb-18-09 10:38 PM by vaberella
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Great vetting process, McCain!
I hope that Palin continues to be a thorn in McCain's side when he runs for reelection here next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC