Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US workers' unions oppose offshoring as IT cos trim jobs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:46 PM
Original message
US workers' unions oppose offshoring as IT cos trim jobs
Source: Economic Times India

9 Feb 2009, 0012 hrs IST, Pankaj Mishra, ET Bureau

BANGALORE: As global tech firms such IBM, Microsoft and EDS-HP seek to trim payrolls by slashing jobs in the US and Europe to cope with a worsening economic slump, information technology workers and unions are taking a more militant stance on the sensitive issue of offshoring.

These unions or employee associations are aggressively questioning plans to send more work to cheaper locations such as India, and are pushing for more jobs in the US.

Microsoft, which announced first job cuts in its history, apart from IBM, is among those facing a backlash from technology worker unions and policymakers. Alliance IBM, a union of technology workers at the world's biggest software services company, has been running a campaign against the company's proposed 2,800 job cuts announced recently.

Washington Alliance of Technology Workers is also among many such organisations in the US running such a campaign. “The Alliance is strongly urging IBM not to go forward with a new round of job cuts and to stop the off-shoring of US workers’ jobs,”Lee Conrad, national coordinator of the Alliance, said in a statement. IBM employs over 70,000 professionals in India, and has plans to increasingly serve its global customers from the country.

Consulting group Challenger, Gray and Christmas said last month that electronics, computer and telecommunications companies in the US have cut their workforce by around 186,955 professionals in 2008, up almost 75% from 2007. The move comes at a time when joblessness is hitting record highs.



Read more: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Infotech/US_workers_unions_oppose_offshoring/articleshow/4096354.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Challenger, Gray and Christmas?
Consulting group Challenger, Gray and Christmas said last month that electronics, computer and telecommunications companies in the US have cut their workforce by around 186,955 professionals in 2008, up almost 75% from 2007.

Is their legal firm Dewey, Cheatam and Howe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Challenger, Gray and Christmas is
a major bigshot employment and management consulting firm based NYC, with regional offices. They're almost always quoted in these kinds of articles, as well as those dealing with employment trends, etc. They're very conservative in their philosophy and outlook, very anti-employee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. So why in the hell isn't EVERY FRIKKIN' EMPLOYEE OF IBM a member of the Alliance?
Honestly, what are these employees thinking? They can sit there and wait until it's their turn to lose their job, or they can try to stop this nonsense by joining a union.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "So why in the hell isn't EVERY FRIKKIN' EMPLOYEE OF IBM a member of the Alliance?"
Good question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Because they see themselves as 'white collar' personel
and feel that unions are for blue-collar people.

They never seem to understand that when the axe falls, it lands on them as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Or maybe because they feel they are so damned "self-reliant" that somehow they will be OK. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC