|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:17 PM Original message |
Sat what? A military judge at Gitmo rejected President Obama's request. Who's running the show here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. Barack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. Damn you really don't get it do you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:23 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. And THAT is why the place should be shut down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. You are still clueless...the President can not order any judge WRT their decisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well lets see if President Obama (Commander In Chief) will stand for this.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. He needs to be in the brig and brought up on charges forthwith |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Once again....Judges exist outside of the normal chain of command. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:37 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Can you point that out, a citation or something. I would like to read it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I don't know about UCMJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:47 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Yes thank you for the motion details. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. thanks for trying to point the obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. but what about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. The military commissions act is OUTSIDE the MCM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. What is the MCM, Marine Corp. Marathon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. The internal Military Court Martial System... covering all service members |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I thought that was the UCMJ. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:13 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. That is the legal code, the united code of military justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Maybe it is like those executive branch "courts" where the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
10. insubordination..? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 11:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unkachuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-29-09 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. dear Mr. President.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC