Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sat what? A military judge at Gitmo rejected President Obama's request. Who's running the show here?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:17 PM
Original message
Sat what? A military judge at Gitmo rejected President Obama's request. Who's running the show here?
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 10:18 PM by NNN0LHI
http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/World/Story/A1Story20090130-118111.html

Refusal to suspend Gitmo trial


Fri, Jan 30, 2009
AFP

WASHINGTON - A MILITARY judge at Guantanamo Bay on Thursday rejected President Barack Obama's request to suspend the trial of a Saudi man accused in the 2000 attack on the USS Cole, the Pentagon said.

'Judge James Pohl denied the motion' put forward by the prosecution at Mr Obama's request to suspend the trial for 120 days, said Defence Department spokesman Jeffrey Gordon.

The Washington Post added the judge found the government's argument in the case of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri 'unpersuasive'.

'Congress passed the military commissions act, which remains in effect. The commission is bound by the law as it currently exists, not as it may change in the future,' the judge wrote according to the Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Barack
He'll get this shit sorted out right fast. When the GOP show their ass like they have so far, he wins. He is not one to be fucked with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Damn you really don't get it do you...
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 11:23 PM by HardcoreProgressive
Obama can not order a military judge any more than he can order a civilian one. He did order the prosecutor to ask for a delay, which the judge, acting within his authority, denied.


On Edit: See the sub thread starting with post #5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. And THAT is why the place should be shut down
Barack wins, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. You are still clueless...the President can not order any judge WRT their decisions
military or civilian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well lets see if President Obama (Commander In Chief) will stand for this....
It sounds like this Judge should be blown out the door ASAP. Seems like a Bush cronie to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He needs to be in the brig and brought up on charges forthwith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Once again....Judges exist outside of the normal chain of command.
They aren't like normal soldiers, and their judicial decisions can only be overriden by the Judicial, and not the Executive branch.

Besides, Obama NEVER ordered him to do anything (because Obama, unlike many DU posters, understands the limits of his authority). Obama ORDERED the PROSECUTOR to REQUEST that the trial be delayed. The prosecutor followed the order. The judge was under no pressure, and certainly no orders, to grant that request.

If Obama wanted to issue a direct order to the judge, he'd have to request that Congress revise the UCMJ first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Can you point that out, a citation or something. I would like to read it.
Edited on Thu Jan-29-09 10:43 PM by lonestarnot
"Subject to regulations of the Secretary concerned" Article 26

(b) A military judge shall be a commissioned officer of the armed forces who is a member of the bar of a Federal court or a member of the bar of the highest court of a State and who is certified to be qualified for duty as a military judge by the Judge Advocate General of the armed force of which such military judge is a member.

sounds like Obama has authority to me.

The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is a federal law, enacted by Congress. Its provisions are contained in United States Code, Title 10, Chapter 47. Article 36 of the UCMJ allows the President to prescribe rules and procedures to implement the provisions of the UCMJ. The President does this via the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) which is an executive order that contains detailed instructions for implementing military law for the United States Armed Forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't know about UCMJ
but I do know that Obama did not direct an order to the judges or anyone else, his administration asked the government attorneys to file a motion seeking that the matters be postponed. The motions were filed and this judge denied the motion, as was his prerogative as a judge. A motion is a request - the party moves for the court to do something or order something. The judge then reviews the motion and the law and makes a decision - that is what this judge did.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yes thank you for the motion details. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. thanks for trying to point the obvious
another MOS outside the normal chain is medical... all kinds of fun when an enlisted medic orders a CO to stand down and go to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. but what about this?
The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is a federal law, enacted by Congress. Its provisions are contained in United States Code, Title 10, Chapter 47. Article 36 of the UCMJ allows the President to prescribe rules and procedures to implement the provisions of the UCMJ. The President does this via the Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM) which is an executive order that contains detailed instructions for implementing military law for the United States Armed Forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The military commissions act is OUTSIDE the MCM
why some of us fought it tooth and nail

Want to bet this will end up at your neighborhood USSC?

Why do you think Chenney said it would not be easy to close GITMO?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What is the MCM, Marine Corp. Marathon?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The internal Military Court Martial System... covering all service members
and coasties

The Military Commission the Congress passed is outside that system, or the civilian legal system... why I am betting this will end up at the United States Supreme Court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I thought that was the UCMJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That is the legal code, the united code of military justice
the one that the court martial system functions under

Under the Geneva Convention if these guys were POWS we would have to try them under the Court Martial system, but that has rights... and protections against self incrimination

The Military Commissions dispense with those niceties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe it is like those executive branch "courts" where the government
is one side and the person involved is the other side. Like the tax court which would be the government vs. the taxpayer. The government could ask for more time and be refused because the accused (or whatever they are at Gitmo) doesn't want to agree to the holdup and the judge decides in favor of the prisoner.

This is the media - they don't explain enough, the reporter doesn't know what is really going on, and no one really understands everything but have a knee jerk reaction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. insubordination..?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-09 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. dear Mr. President....
....just a friendly reminder, you can't take credit for closing gitmo, until you actually close gitmo....

"But no decision has yet been made on what to do with the detainees still held at Guantanamo, most of them without charge, and many of whom cannot be returned to their home countries for various reasons."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC