Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poisoned food - pet AND human is what you get without regulation and inspections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:21 AM
Original message
Poisoned food - pet AND human is what you get without regulation and inspections
That Republican canard - regulation and oversight is bad for business. Not as bad as poisoning thousands of pets and killing off tens of brands is going to be.

THEY DO NOT HAVE THE MORAL FORTITUDE TO REGULATE THEMSELVES!!!!

Greed and profit will always out.They will always prefer to have a smaller payroll and higher CEO pay. Screw quality, regardless of what their tail wagging, swelling music, and folksy sounding narrator commercials claim.

How hard would it have been for the Peter Pan peanut butter people to do a batch analysis? How about the spinach people? The lunch meat people? The pet foods just brings this to the nth degree. These were millions and millions of cans that were produced for so many different brands over a sustained period of time. Didn't one single company in all that time look at their product to see what they were selling the American public?

What would prevent a malicious person from purposefully contaminating a product in the American food chain? One popular product eaten by millions of Americans? How many would have to die before someone, somewhere made the connection?

This, my friends, is why we NEED regulation and government inspections. The companies will not do it themselves as they have proved time after time after !@#$ing time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Jungle by Upton Sinclair....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes, everything old is new again.
Complacency sets in and we forget the lessons of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. When one thinks in a laissez faire style of govt. it is hard to
stay with the 'some control' by the people kind of govt. You end up being called a communist when all you want is just what you said some control on how you live. It is always the same people who want all the control that seem to get that power by the same rules the people put in in the first place. Govt. by the people is an endless quest. Greed and power are something that never seems to go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. We knew it would happen with these clowns.
I just hope the American public learns from this, too. All the people who grumble about OSHA regulations, saying they're bad for business should be noticing the rise in industrial accidents in this country. I used to trust the FDA, back when its' purpose was to protect the American public from danger and contamination. No more. And the drug companies seem to be testing out it's new medications on the public now. The thing is, these megacorporations can afford to pay restitution for a few dozen dead people without hurting their bottom line. I guess "It's just business".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Regulations are for a reason - to protect the public
from things they are unable to protect themselves from.

Most people don't know that this crappy government FORBIDS a small meat packer in Colrado from voluntarily and at thier own expense testing every single cow in their packing plant for mad cow! Why? Because it would set a de facto standard by example that the meat industry is not voluntarily willing to do on their own. This company I am speaking of was trying to open an export market with Japan which would have required this testing. The government refused to sell them the necessary testing kits!

Our current government only looks out for the "haves" and the "have yachts".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer99 Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. there will be more deaths and illnesses just wait
Edited on Sat Mar-24-07 10:13 AM by Stargazer99
Unitl the Demos shove inspection and responsibility down Republican throats. I view it as capitalism being the problem. Capitalism is based on eliminating the expenses or outsourcing them to the taxpayer so the bottom line is larger and larger every year. This responsibilty conservative Republicans rant about seems only to apply to the lower social strata. If Republicans truly valued responsibility there would be more and intense investigations of business. Presently the administration wants Mexican vehicles to go farther and farther into the US to deliver products. Mexicans vehicles are not inspected like the semis in the US, who gets killed next all for the worship of business and capitalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. One good thing to come out of this
and I mean no disrespect to those who have had pets affected, is that dems and pubs share one thing in common. We both love our pets. Seriously. It's the one thing that makes me think all hope with them is not lost. They might realize in a personal way why regulation is necessary. Personally, if the gov doesn't have to be involved in the regulatory process, then it shouldn't be. If private industry can set up a regulatory entity, like Underwriter Laboratories, then fine. If not, or in interim, the gov should step in. But it is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC