Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just what is the EFCA?? (Employee Free Choice Act)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:18 PM
Original message
Just what is the EFCA?? (Employee Free Choice Act)
How would it affect employees? And how would it affect employers? Is this why the Republicans are holding up the nomination of the Representative from CA? Because she is pro-union? How would the EFCA change the workplace?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's some info...
http://www.freechoiceact.org/cwa/pages/efca_learnmore


It is in the name of those workers that CWA is fighting for the Employee Free Choice Act. EFCA provides for the certification of a union as the bargaining representative if the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) finds that a majority of employees in an appropriate bargaining unit have signed written forms designating the union as its collective bargaining agent

EFCA also speeds along the process of bargaining between employer and employees for their first contract by obligating both parties to reach an agreement, through escalating procedures of mediation and arbitration, if necessary.

EFCA requires stronger penalties against employers for engaging in unfair labor practices while employees are attempting to organize or obtain a first contract. The bill mandates that the NLRB must seek a federal court injunction against an employer whenever there is reasonable cause to believe that the employer has discharged employees or discriminated against them or engaged in conduct that interferes significantly with employee rights during an organizing campaign or bargaining for a first contract.

The Act also mandates an award of three times the amount of back pay for illegal discrimination that occurs during efforts to organize or when workers are seeking a first contract. The legislation provides for penalties up to $20,000 per violation against employers found to have willfully or repeatedly violated workers' rights during an organizing campaign or pursuit of a first contract.



Once you've got the facts, sign the petition.
http://www.freechoiceact.org/cwa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Done; CWA here
TIU also one time teamster too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. google is your friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. the Wiki page is fairly comprehensive.
Summary, pros and cons, and how it would be applied.


Read for yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. I know that countries like Canada have it and it keeps the identity of...
an employee private when they actually sign a Union card.

http://www.freechoiceact.org/petition/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. It would make it easier for workers to unionize
Therefore, Big Business has spent millions trying to scare you into believing it would hurt you, because they are scared shitless about the EFCA. It would change the workplace because it would give workers more rights through unionization, raising the pay of workers and helping them fight for benefits that corporations are refusing to freely give.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Walmarts worst nightmare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Wouldn't that be something if Walmart were Unionized.... They would probably...
sooner close every store than let that happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I admit that I'm a little confused about this, but, as it stands now:
Employers can call for a vote on whether there can be a Union in the workplace and Employers can decide whether that vote is public or private.

Employees can, de facto, take a vote also, but they cannot call for that vote on whether there is going to be a Union or not to be public. They can only collect votes privately.

This gives employers the upper hand in the question as to whether there will be a union in the workplace, because they can find out who is supporting the formation of the Union and put pressure on them by calling for a public vote. I suppose employers do in some situations call for private votes, but private votes don't really benefit them that much, other than to help organize opposition to the Union.

Private votes help Unions to some extent, because private votes allow them to test the waters, without too much in the way of consequences, but until the vote actually succeeds, Unions would have a problem with people switching back and forth, depending upon what the employers are up to. Being able to call for a public vote allows the employees who support the Union to solidify their organization and, thus, have a better idea of how to proceed.

One thing that I think is confusing people is that all of this only applies to the FORMATION OF THE UNION. Once the Union is established, employers will have whatever control over negotiations that is available to them now in the status quo.

???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC