Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There's a fine line between "stimulus" and "pork"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kashka-Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:55 PM
Original message
There's a fine line between "stimulus" and "pork"
AT first when I heard talk of $$$ for infrastructure, I was thinking – wow. R& D for alternative energy sources and everything we might need to get a post-oil economy in gear. Retooling/ reinventing our industrial base. Innovative, effective mass transit. Getting our public school buildings and entire education system ready for the next 100 yrs. State of the art levees for New Orleans.

But I’m starting to fear that instead of a phenomenal opportunity, this might end up being a phenomenal deepening of debt and waste on a colossal scale. All I hear is “roads and bridges, roads and bridges, roads and bridges.” Roads and bridges are notoriously porky wastes of federal money – eg Sarah Palin’s notorious bridge to nowhere. Besides it was the “roads and bridges” crowd back in the 1920s who sent us down the road of developing the auto industry and oil dependency. It was then when we chose as a nation to divert fed funds - erything transit/transportation from then on went into the car-based economy.

Locally, we’re hearing about condo and office development under the guise of rebuilding of our downtown library. It won’t be just rebuilding the library. That would be OK. Oh no, its got to be a gazaillion stories tall with condos and offices – never mind that our downtown has been so seriously overbuilt with condos and offices that there is a huge vacancy rate, a glut of them left unsold esp with the credit situation. This would do nothing more than profit the same old speculator-developers who spent the last 20 years getting rich messing up our downtown, and nothing to innovate or develop new economies for our region.

Does anyone have any detail about what else is being considered as stimulus – I mean, besides the same old roads’n’bridges? Yep, I've been googling my heart out, just not seeing much detail. I think it would help get the repubs (and skeptics like me) on board if we could start seeing some detail

How is Obama & our legislators going to distinguish between pork and stimulus? Its up to us to closely scrutinize this and question everything. Now is our chance to have a functioning democracy—let’s go to it!! Yahoo!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. A stimulus is just pork delivered with strategy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. pork is a stimulus that doesn't work
building condos where there is already a high vacancy rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I didn't know pork was supposed to not work
I always thought it was just getting a project built in your constituency, giving your district jobs - without any research into whether said project was needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. pork is a derogatory term
and in the context of a stimulus bill, is usually intended to point out the spending will likely not result in the expected economic activity.

The difference between stimulus and pork is like the difference between a vinophile and a drunk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Line-item vetoes, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Line item veto was found to be Unconstitutional by SCOTUS...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Should have known
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. According to today's Free Press, Michigan's share of the $850B stimulus is only $2.6B
Let's see. $850 billion divided by 50 = $2.6 billion? :wtf:

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009901230393
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Gee 2600 million is now "only"
A million just isn't worth as much as it used to be that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, "only". It's .3% of the overall stimulus. And yet Michigan is one of 50 states.
Michigan is one of 50 states, and one of the more populous ones at that. We deserve more than .3% of the overall stimulus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. The federal spending per state will vary depending on how many state building projects have been
Edited on Fri Jan-23-09 03:13 PM by SurferBoy
authorized but placed on the backburner.

Maybe the "infrastructure spending" portion of the stimulus determined that Michigan only has about $2.6 billion in authorized state road/bridge projects waiting to be funded.

Remember, not all the ~$800 billion is for infrastructure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. If the money is allocated on a basis other than need, then it is PORK. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. a stimulus usually has caffeine in it
Coffee, strong tea, Jolt Cola

Pork on the other hand is an essential flavoring ingredient, without which many traditional meals would be tasteless and lacking in essential saturated fat calories
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. uh..huhuh..hehe
uh..huhuh..hehe...huhu..."stimulus" huhuh..hehe...huhu..

huhuh..hehe...huhu.. "pork" ...huhuh..hehe...huhu..



:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It really seems like most of the threads in GD belong in the Lounge today!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. hey
you know, when it says both "stimulus" and "pork" in the subject line, it's hard to restrain my inner adolescent. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. I am convinced that the key is for us (the government) to directly finance fledgling
small businesses outside of the current SBA system of corporate welfare.

Small business is the engine of our economy, employs America, and drives the innovation that was the cornerstone of our greatness. Big business takes care of itself by stifling competition and innovation, constantly seeking to reduce/eliminate employment and living standards.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Considering the state of so many American bridges, I have no problem
with money being spent to modernize, bolster, and/or replace them.

But I do agree that we need more reliable mass transit than we need more roads. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. That's what I was about to say
All this stuff has been put off for an eternity in the name of small government and now the country is literally falling apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. I look at it this way....
"Stimulus" will be in the bill all the way.

"Pork" has become a sort of back door way to get line items in bills after they leave committee, and often after they are signed and passed and voted on by the floor. If we can stop the shenanigans, then we can stick to stimulus and avoid the pork.

We're getting lots of promises. It's a good idea to try and keep track of this stuff.

I'm thinking that almost any project that gets people working and has a long term public benefit is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC